BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A precise means to cut bone without significant thermal or mechanical injury has thus far remained elusive. A novel non-ionizing ultrafast pulsed picosecond infrared laser (PIRL) may provide the solution. Tissue ablation with the PIRL occurs via a photothermal process with thermal and stress confinement, resulting in efficient material ejection greatly enhanced through front surface spallation photomechanical effects. By comparison, the Er:YAG laser (EYL) ablates via photothermal and cavitation-induced photomechanical effects without thermal or acoustic confinement, leading to significant collateral tissue injury. This study compared PIRL and EYL bone ablation by infrared thermography (IRT), environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM), and histology. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, comparative, ex vivo animal model. SETTING: Optics laboratory. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ten circular area defects were ablated in ex vivo chicken humeral cortex using PIRL and EYL at similar average power (~70 mW) under IRT. Following fixation, ESEM and undecalcified light microscopy images were obtained and examined for signs of cellular injury. RESULTS: Peak rise in surface temperature was negligible and lower for PIRL (1.56 °C; 95% CI, 0.762-2.366) compared to EYL ablation (12.99 °C; 95% CI, 12.189-13.792) (P < .001). ESEM and light microscopy demonstrated preserved cortical microstructure following PIRL ablation in contrast to diffuse thermal injury seen with EYL ablation. Microfractures were not observed. CONCLUSION: Ablation of cortical bone using the PIRL generates negligible and significantly less heat than EYL ablation while preserving cortical microstructure. This novel laser has great potential in advancing surgical techniques where precision osseous manipulation is required.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A precise means to cut bone without significant thermal or mechanical injury has thus far remained elusive. A novel non-ionizing ultrafast pulsed picosecond infrared laser (PIRL) may provide the solution. Tissue ablation with the PIRL occurs via a photothermal process with thermal and stress confinement, resulting in efficient material ejection greatly enhanced through front surface spallation photomechanical effects. By comparison, the Er:YAG laser (EYL) ablates via photothermal and cavitation-induced photomechanical effects without thermal or acoustic confinement, leading to significant collateral tissue injury. This study compared PIRL and EYL bone ablation by infrared thermography (IRT), environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM), and histology. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, comparative, ex vivo animal model. SETTING: Optics laboratory. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ten circular area defects were ablated in ex vivo chicken humeral cortex using PIRL and EYL at similar average power (~70 mW) under IRT. Following fixation, ESEM and undecalcified light microscopy images were obtained and examined for signs of cellular injury. RESULTS: Peak rise in surface temperature was negligible and lower for PIRL (1.56 °C; 95% CI, 0.762-2.366) compared to EYL ablation (12.99 °C; 95% CI, 12.189-13.792) (P < .001). ESEM and light microscopy demonstrated preserved cortical microstructure following PIRL ablation in contrast to diffuse thermal injury seen with EYL ablation. Microfractures were not observed. CONCLUSION: Ablation of cortical bone using the PIRL generates negligible and significantly less heat than EYL ablation while preserving cortical microstructure. This novel laser has great potential in advancing surgical techniques where precision osseous manipulation is required.
Entities:
Keywords:
Er:YAG laser; bone ablation; bone cutting; cold ablation; laser ablation; picosecond infrared laser (PIRL); ultrafast laser ablation
Authors: Arne Böttcher; Stanislav Kucher; Rainald Knecht; Nathan Jowett; Peter Krötz; Rudolph Reimer; Udo Schumacher; Sven Anders; Adrian Münscher; Carsten V Dalchow; R J Dwayne Miller Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2015-01-11 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Reinhard E Friedrich; Maria Quade; Nate Jowett; Peter Kroetz; Michael Amling; Felix K Kohlrusch; Jozef Zustin; Martin Gosau; Hartmut SchlÜter; R J Dwayne Miller Journal: In Vivo Date: 2020 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Hannes Petersen; Alexandra Gliese; Yannick Stober; Stephanie Maier; Nils-Owe Hansen; Sebastian Kruber; Dennis Eggert; Miklós Tóth; Tobias Gosau; Hartmut Schlüter; Klaus Püschel; Udo Schumacher; Robert John Dwayne Miller; Adrian Münscher; Carsten Dalchow Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Hannes Petersen; Fatemeh Tavakoli; Sebastian Kruber; Adrian Münscher; Alexandra Gliese; Nils-Owe Hansen; Stephanie Uschold; Dennis Eggert; Wesley D Robertson; Tobias Gosau; Susanne Sehner; Marcel Kwiatkowski; Hartmut Schlüter; Udo Schumacher; Rainald Knecht; R J Dwayne Miller Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: David Canteli; Cristina Muñoz-García; Miguel Morales; Andrés Márquez; Sara Lauzurica; Juan Arregui; Aritz Lazkoz; Carlos Molpeceres Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2019-09-09 Impact factor: 3.623