Literature DB >> 24375301

Impact of intrapancreatic or extrapancreatic bile duct involvement on survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for common bile duct cancer.

K Kamposioras1, A Anthoney, C Fernández Moro, A Cairns, A M Smith, C Liaskos, C S Verbeke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinicopathological factors that influence survival following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for common bile duct (CBD) cancer are not well known. This study aimed to investigate the effect of tumour involvement of the intrapancreatic versus extrapancreatic CBD on margin status, overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent PD for CBD cancer between 2001 and 2009. Pathological examination was performed according to a previously described standardized protocol based on axial slicing. Clinicopathological data and outcome in terms of margin status, DFS and OS were compared between cancers involving exclusively the intrapancreatic CBD (CBDin) and those involving the extrapancreatic CBD, in isolation or combined with invasion of the intrapancreatic part of the duct (CBDex).
RESULTS: A total of 66 patients were enrolled. Most CBD cancers were locally advanced (97 per cent pathological (p) T3, 76 per cent pN1). Microscopic margin involvement (R1) was more frequent in CBDex than in CBDin cancers (34 of 39 versus 13 of 27; P = 0.001), more often multifocal (P < 0.001) and more frequently affected the periductal margin (P = 0.005). Venous resection was more often required for CBDex cancers (P = 0.009). CBDex cancers were associated with worse OS (median 21 versus 28 months; P = 0.020) and DFS (14 versus 31 months; P = 0.015), but the rate and site of recurrence did not differ. Metastasis to more than two lymph nodes was an independent predictor of OS and DFS.
CONCLUSION: CBDex cancer is associated with a higher rate of R1 resection and venous resection after PD, and has a worse outcome than CBDin cancer.
© 2013 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24375301     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  5 in total

1.  A Novel Prognostic Score Combining Preoperative Biliary Drainage and Inflammatory Status for Patients with Periampullary Cancers.

Authors:  Yuki Fujiwara; Koichiro Haruki; Ryoga Hamura; Takashi Horiuchi; Yoshihiro Shirai; Kenei Furukawa; Takeshi Gocho; Hiroaki Shiba; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  The prognostic impact of peritoneal washing cytology for otherwise resectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients.

Authors:  Tatsuaki Sumiyoshi; Kenichiro Uemura; Naru Kondo; Kenjiro Okada; Shingo Seo; Hiroyuki Otsuka; Masahiro Serikawa; Yasutaka Ishii; Norimasa Kuraoka; Takuya Sakoda; Kenta Baba; Takumi Harada; Yoshiaki Murakami; Shinya Takahashi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Is surgery justified for elderly patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? Reappraisal from a viewpoint of comorbidity and organ function.

Authors:  Tatsuaki Sumiyoshi; Kenichiro Uemura; Naru Kondo; Kenjiro Okada; Shingo Seo; Hiroyuki Otsuka; Masahiro Serikawa; Yasutaka Ishii; Tomofumi Tsuboi; Yoshiaki Murakami; Shinya Takahashi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-08-22       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Confinement to the intrapancreatic bile duct is independently associated with a better prognosis in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Keun Soo Ahn; Koo Jeong Kang; Yu Na Kang; Yong Hoon Kim; Tae-Seok Kim
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Long-Term Outcome of Distal Cholangiocarcinoma after Pancreaticoduodenectomy Followed by Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A 15-Year Experience in a Single Institution.

Authors:  Byoung Hyuck Kim; Kyubo Kim; Eui Kyu Chie; Jeanny Kwon; Jin-Young Jang; Sun Whe Kim; Do-Youn Oh; Yung-Jue Bang
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.679

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.