Literature DB >> 24375149

Leisure-time physical activity and endometrial cancer risk: dose-response meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.

NaNa Keum1, Woong Ju, Dong Hoon Lee, Eric L Ding, Chung C Hsieh, Julie E Goodman, Edward L Giovannucci.   

Abstract

Although considerable evidence suggests that leisure-time physical activity is associated with a reduced risk of endometrial cancer (EC), the shape of dose-response relationship has not been investigated and previous meta-analyses have not accounted for differences in measures of physical activity. To address such issues, we conducted linear and nonlinear dose-response meta-analyses by metabolic equivalent of task (MET)-hour/week and hour/week, respectively, based on observational studies published up to September 2013 identified from PubMed and Embase databases. Summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. In the linear dose-response analysis, an increase in leisure-time physical activity by 3 MET-hour/week was associated with an ∼2% reduced risk of EC (summary RR = 0.98, p = 0.02, 95% CI = 0.95-1.00, I(2)  = 53%, p(heterogeneity)  = 0.06, three case-control studies and three cohort studies, 3,460 cases, range of activity = 0-50 MET-hour/week) and an increase by an hour/week was associated with an ∼5% reduced risk of EC (summary RR = 0.95, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.93-0.98, I(2)  = 31%, p(heterogeneity)  = 0.20, four case-control studies and two cohort studies, 3,314 cases, range of activity = 0-12 hour/week). Nonlinear dose-response meta-analysis suggested that the curve may plateau at 10 MET-hour/week (p(change) in slope  = 0.04) but this statistical significance was sensitive to one study. No evidence of a nonlinear association was indicated by hour/week (p(change) in slope  > 0.69). In conclusion, an increase in leisure-time physical activity may continue to decrease EC risk, within the range of 0-50 MET-hour/week or 0-15 hour/week. Future studies should evaluate possible independent role of intensity of physical activity and effect modification by obesity.
© 2013 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dose-response; endometrial cancer; meta-analysis; physical activity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24375149     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  14 in total

1.  Objectively measured physical activity and plasma metabolomics in the Shanghai Physical Activity Study.

Authors:  Qian Xiao; Steven C Moore; Sarah K Keadle; Yong-Bing Xiang; Wei Zheng; Tricia M Peters; Michael F Leitzmann; Bu-Tian Ji; Joshua N Sampson; Xiao-Ou Shu; Charles E Matthews
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Exploring the Linkage between Activity-Friendly Zoning, Inactivity, and Cancer Incidence in the United States.

Authors:  Lisa M Nicholson; Julien Leider; Jamie F Chriqui
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of physical activity and endometrial cancer risk.

Authors:  Daniela Schmid; Gundula Behrens; Marlen Keimling; Carmen Jochem; Cristian Ricci; Michael Leitzmann
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 4.  Quantifying the Effect of Physical Activity on Endometrial Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Sarah J Kitson; Olivia Aurangzeb; Jawaria Parvaiz; Artitaya Lophatananon; Kenneth R Muir; Emma J Crosbie
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2022-09-01

5.  Cancer Progress and Priorities: Uterine Cancer.

Authors:  Ashley S Felix; Louise A Brinton
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  American College of Sports Medicine Roundtable Report on Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Cancer Prevention and Control.

Authors:  Alpa V Patel; Christine M Friedenreich; Steven C Moore; Sandra C Hayes; Julie K Silver; Kristin L Campbell; Kerri Winters-Stone; Lynn H Gerber; Stephanie M George; Janet E Fulton; Crystal Denlinger; G Stephen Morris; Trisha Hue; Kathryn H Schmitz; Charles E Matthews
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Development and Validation of Lifestyle-Based Models to Predict Incidence of the Most Common Potentially Preventable Cancers.

Authors:  Juliet A Usher-Smith; Stephen J Sharp; Robert Luben; Simon J Griffin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Physical Activity From Adolescence Through Midlife and Associations With Body Mass Index and Endometrial Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Pedro F Saint-Maurice; Joshua N Sampson; Kara A Michels; Steven C Moore; Erikka Loftfield; Kathleen McClain; Michael B Cook; Britton Trabert; Charles E Matthews
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2021-07-16

Review 9.  Household physical activity and cancer risk: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Yun Shi; Tingting Li; Ying Wang; Lingling Zhou; Qin Qin; Jieyun Yin; Sheng Wei; Li Liu; Shaofa Nie
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Active Learning Increases Children's Physical Activity across Demographic Subgroups.

Authors:  John B Bartholomew; Esbelle M Jowers; Gregory Roberts; Anna-Mária Fall; Vanessa L Errisuriz; Sharon Vaughn
Journal:  Transl J Am Coll Sports Med       Date:  2018-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.