Emanuela Zannin1, Maria Luisa Ventura2, Raffaele L Dellacà1, Miria Natile2, Paolo Tagliabue2, Elizabeth J Perkins3, Magdy Sourial4, Risha Bhatia5, Peter A Dargaville6, David G Tingay7. 1. Dipartimento di Elettronica Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano University, Milano, Italy. 2. Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione MBBM - Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza, Italy. 3. 1] Neonatal Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia [2] Department of Neonatology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 4. Department of Neonatology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 5. Neonatal Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 6. 1] Neonatal Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia [2] Department of Paediatrics, Royal Hobart Hospital and University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia [3] Neonatal Respiratory Group, Menzies Research Institute, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. 7. 1] Neonatal Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia [2] Department of Neonatology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia [3] Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aims of the present study were (i) to characterize the relationship between mean airway pressure (PAW) and reactance measured at 5 Hz (reactance of the respiratory system (X RS), forced oscillation technique) and (ii) to compare optimal PAW (P opt) defined by X RS, oxygenation, lung volume (VL), and tidal volume (VT) in preterm lambs receiving high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). METHODS: Nine 132-d gestation lambs were commenced on HFOV at PAW of 14 cmH2O (P start). PAW was increased stepwise to a maximum pressure (P max) and subsequently sequentially decreased to the closing pressure (Pcl, oxygenation deteriorated) or a minimum of 6 cmH2O, using an oxygenation-based recruitment maneuver. X RS, regional V L (electrical impedance tomography), and V T were measured immediately after (t 0 min) and 2 min after (t 2 min) each PAW decrement. P opt defined by oxygenation, X RS, V L, and V T were determined. RESULTS: The PAW-X RS and PAW-VT relationships were dome shaped with a maximum at Pcl+6 cmH2O, the same point as P opt defined by VL. Below Pcl+6 cmH2O, X RS became unstable between t 0 min and t 2 min and was associated with derecruitment in the dependent lung. P opt, as defined by oxygenation, was lower than the P opt defined by X RS, V L, or V T. CONCLUSION: X RS has the potential as a bedside tool for optimizing PAW during HFOV.
BACKGROUND: The aims of the present study were (i) to characterize the relationship between mean airway pressure (PAW) and reactance measured at 5 Hz (reactance of the respiratory system (X RS), forced oscillation technique) and (ii) to compare optimal PAW (P opt) defined by X RS, oxygenation, lung volume (VL), and tidal volume (VT) in preterm lambs receiving high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). METHODS: Nine 132-d gestation lambs were commenced on HFOV at PAW of 14 cmH2O (P start). PAW was increased stepwise to a maximum pressure (P max) and subsequently sequentially decreased to the closing pressure (Pcl, oxygenation deteriorated) or a minimum of 6 cmH2O, using an oxygenation-based recruitment maneuver. X RS, regional V L (electrical impedance tomography), and V T were measured immediately after (t 0 min) and 2 min after (t 2 min) each PAW decrement. P opt defined by oxygenation, X RS, V L, and V T were determined. RESULTS: The PAW-X RS and PAW-VT relationships were dome shaped with a maximum at Pcl+6 cmH2O, the same point as P opt defined by VL. Below Pcl+6 cmH2O, X RS became unstable between t 0 min and t 2 min and was associated with derecruitment in the dependent lung. P opt, as defined by oxygenation, was lower than the P opt defined by X RS, V L, or V T. CONCLUSION: X RS has the potential as a bedside tool for optimizing PAW during HFOV.
Authors: David G Tingay; Graeme R Polglase; Risha Bhatia; Clare A Berry; Robert J Kopotic; Clinton P Kopotic; Yong Song; Edgardo Szyld; Alan H Jobe; J Jane Pillow Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2015-01-29
Authors: Ilaria Milesi; David G Tingay; Emanuela Zannin; Federico Bianco; Paolo Tagliabue; Fabio Mosca; Anna Lavizzari; Maria Luisa Ventura; C Elroy Zonneveld; Elizabeth J Perkins; Don Black; Magdy Sourial; Raffaele L Dellacá Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: David G Tingay; Anushi Rajapaksa; Karen McCall; Cornelis E E Zonneveld; Don Black; Elizabeth Perkins; Magdy Sourial; Anna Lavizzari; Peter G Davis Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Benjamin W Ackermann; Daniel Klotz; Roland Hentschel; Ulrich H Thome; Anton H van Kaam Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2022-02-08 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Martijn Miedema; Karen E McCall; Elizabeth J Perkins; Regina B Oakley; Prue M Pereira-Fantini; Anushi E Rajapaksa; Andreas D Waldmann; David G Tingay; Anton H van Kaam Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2019-01-22 Impact factor: 3.418