Literature DB >> 24374667

The incidence and management of secondary abdominoplasty and secondary abdominal contour surgery.

Alan Matarasso1, Lisa F Schneider, Jason Barr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist in the literature regarding the general incidence of secondary abdominal contour procedures and secondary abdominoplasty (excluding revisions) or specific recommendations for surgical management of these patients.
METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective chart review of 562 patients who underwent abdominal contouring procedures (liposuction and/or modified or full abdominoplasty) performed by a single surgeon (A.M.) from January of 2004 until October of 2012. Nonsurgical primary cases, secondary surgery that was revisional in nature, and massive weight loss patients were excluded.
RESULTS: Seventy-three patients (13.0 percent) underwent secondary abdominal contouring procedures. Forty-six of 73 patients had charts available to be examined in greater detail. Thirty-four of these patients underwent secondary liposuction, whereas 12 of these patients had secondary full abdominoplasty procedures. Secondary operations occurred an average of 4.98 years after the primary procedure (range, 6 months to 15 years). Patients underwent secondary liposuction (n = 34) on average 3.16 years after their initial procedure, significantly sooner than patients who underwent secondary abdominoplasty (n = 12) 8.35 years after their initial procedure (p = 0.002). Patients with a body mass index less than 25 kg/m2 (n = 26) had both secondary liposuction (n = 16) and secondary abdominoplasty (n = 10), whereas all patients who had a body mass index of 25 kg/m2 or greater (n = 20) underwent only secondary liposuction.
CONCLUSIONS: True secondary abdominal contouring procedures represented 13.0 percent of all abdominal contouring procedures. The most common indication for a secondary procedure was an umbilical-site closure scar. Specific recommendations for surgical management of five common scenarios for secondary abdominal procedures are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24374667     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000436525.56422.4d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

1.  Technical feasibility and safety profile of laparoscopic diverted sleeve gastrectomy with ileal transposition (DSIT).

Authors:  Alper Celik; Surendra Ugale; Hasan Ofluoglu; Muharrem Asci; Bahri Onur Celik; Erol Vural; Mustafa Aydin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Managing Complications in Abdominoplasty: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Pedro Vidal; Juan Enrique Berner; Patrick A Will
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2017-09-15

3.  Post-Bariatric Plastic Surgery: Abdominoplasty, the State of the Art in Body Contouring.

Authors:  Payam Sadeghi; Daniela Duarte-Bateman; Wanyan Ma; Ryan Khalaf; R'ay Fodor; Gorizio Pieretti; Feliciano Ciccarelli; Hamed Harandi; Roberto Cuomo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 4.  Avoidance and Correction of Deformities in Body Contouring.

Authors:  Andrew M Ferry; Edward Chamata; Rami P Dibbs; Norman H Rappaport
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Mesh Repair of Rectus Diastasis for Abdominoplasty is Safer than Suture Plication.

Authors:  Rachita Sood; Lindsay E Janes; Nikita Shah; Daniel C Sasson; Marco F Ellis; Gregory A Dumanian
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-08-04

6.  Mesh abdominoplasty for rectus diastasis in women and men.

Authors:  G A Dumanian; S Moradian
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.739

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.