Literature DB >> 24374462

Statins for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.

Layli Eslami1, Shahin Merat, Reza Malekzadeh, Siavosh Nasseri-Moghaddam, Hermineh Aramin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are common causes of elevated liver enzymes in the general population. NASH and to some extent NAFLD have been associated with increased liver-related and all-cause mortality. No effective treatment is yet available. Recent reports have shown that the use of hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) in patients with elevated plasma aminotransferases may result in normalisation of these liver enzymes. Whether this is a consistent effect or whether it can lead to improved clinical outcomes beyond normalisation of abnormal liver enzymes is not clear.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of statins (that is, lovastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and fluvastatin) on all-cause and liver-related mortality, adverse events, and histological, biochemical, and imaging responses in patients with NAFLD or NASH. SEARCH
METHODS: We performed a computerised literature search in the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded up to March 2013. We did fully recursive searches from the reference lists of all retrieved relevant publications to ensure a complete and comprehensive search of the published literature. We did not apply any restrictions regarding language of publication or publication date. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised clinical trials using statins as the primary treatment for NAFLD or NASH versus no treatment, placebo, or other hypolipidaemic agents. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted, and risk of bias of each trial was assessed independently by two or more review authors. Meta-analyses were performed whenever possible. Review Manager 5.2 was used. MAIN
RESULTS: When the described search method was used and the eligibility criteria of the search results were applied, 653 records were found. Only two of these were randomised clinical trials that were considered eligible for inclusion. We assessed both trials as trials with high risk of bias. One of the trials was a pilot trial in which 16 participants with biopsy-proven NASH were randomised to receive simvastatin 40 mg (n = 10) or placebo (n = 6) once daily for 12 months. No statistically significant improvement in the aminotransferase level was seen in the simvastatin group compared with the placebo group. Liver histology was not significantly affected by simvastatin.The other trial had three arms. The trial compared atorvastatin 20 mg daily (n = 63) versus fenofibrate 200 mg daily (n = 62) versus a group treated with a combination of the two interventions (n = 61). There were no statistically significant differences between any of the three intervention groups regarding the week 54 mean activity levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and alkaline phosphatase. The triglyceride levels seemed higher in the fenofibrate group compared with the atorvastatin group. Liver histology was not assessed in this trial. The presence of biochemical and ultrasonographic evidence of NAFLD seemed to be higher in the fenofibrate group compared with the atorvastatin group (58% versus 33%). Three patients discontinued treatment due to myalgia and elevated serum creatine kinase activity; one from the atorvastatin group and two from the combination group. Another patient from the atorvastatin group discontinued treatment due to alanine aminotransferase activity that was over three times the upper normal limit.No data for all-cause mortality and hepatic-related mortality were reported in the included trials. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this review, which included two trials with high risk of bias and a small numbers of participants, it seems possible that statins may improve serum aminotransferase levels as well as ultrasound findings. Neither of the trials reported on possible histological changes, liver-related morbidity or mortality. Trials with larger sample sizes and low risk of bias are necessary before we may suggest statins as an effective treatment for patients with NASH. However, as statins can improve the adverse outcomes of other conditions commonly associated with NASH (for example, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome), their use in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis may be justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24374462     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008623.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  40 in total

1.  Effects of Pitavastatin on Insulin Sensitivity and Liver Fat: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Laurie R Braun; Meghan N Feldpausch; Natalia Czerwonka; Julian Weiss; Karen Branch; Hang Lee; Edgar L Martinez-Salazar; Martin Torriani; Craig A Sponseller; Steven K Grinspoon; Takara L Stanley
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Omega-3 for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children.

Authors:  Paul Clerc; Marialena Mouzaki; Ran D Goldman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a comprehensive review of a growing epidemic.

Authors:  Kareem Hassan; Varun Bhalla; Mohammed Ezz El Regal; H Hesham A-Kader
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of metabolic associated fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Mohammed Eslam; Shiv K Sarin; Vincent Wai-Sun Wong; Jian-Gao Fan; Takumi Kawaguchi; Sang Hoon Ahn; Ming-Hua Zheng; Gamal Shiha; Yusuf Yilmaz; Rino Gani; Shahinul Alam; Yock Young Dan; Jia-Horng Kao; Saeed Hamid; Ian Homer Cua; Wah-Kheong Chan; Diana Payawal; Soek-Siam Tan; Tawesak Tanwandee; Leon A Adams; Manoj Kumar; Masao Omata; Jacob George
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 5.  The Use of Statins in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease and Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Carlos Moctezuma-Velázquez; Juan G Abraldes; Aldo J Montano-Loza
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06

6.  Reducing liver function tests for statin monitoring: an observational comparison of two clinical commissioning groups.

Authors:  Kate Homer; John Robson; Susannah Solaiman; Abigail Davis; Saima Zubeda Khan; David McCoy; Rohini Mathur; Sally Hull; Kambiz Boomla
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  Inflammation and Metabolic Complications in HIV.

Authors:  Kassem Bourgi; Celestine Wanjalla; John R Koethe
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.071

8.  Therapeutic effect of rosuvastatin and propylthiouracil on ameliorating high-cholesterol diet-induced fatty liver disease, fibrosis and inflammation in rabbit.

Authors:  Pao-Yuan Lin; Chih-Hung Chen; Christopher Glenn Wallace; Kuan-Hung Chen; Chia-Lo Chang; Hong-Hwa Chen; Pei-Hsun Sung; Kun-Chen Lin; Sheung-Fat Ko; Cheuk-Kwan Sun; Hsueh-Wen Chang; Pei-Lin Shao; Mel S Lee; Hon-Kan Yip
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 9.  Pleiotropic effects of statins: new therapeutic targets in drug design.

Authors:  Onkar Bedi; Veena Dhawan; P L Sharma; Puneet Kumar
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 10.  Statins and New-Onset Diabetes in Cardiovascular and Kidney Disease Cohorts: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Haroon Kamran; Eric Kupferstein; Navneet Sharma; Jocelyne G Karam; Alyson K Myers; Irini Youssef; James R Sowers; Deborah R Gustafson; Moro O Salifu; Samy I McFarlane
Journal:  Cardiorenal Med       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.