Literature DB >> 24374332

Ethical issues in the reuse of qualitative data: perspectives from literature, practice, and participants.

Sarah J Yardley1, Kate M Watts, Jennifer Pearson, Jane C Richardson.   

Abstract

In this article, we explore ethical issues in qualitative secondary analysis through a comparison of the literature with practitioner and participant perspectives. To achieve this, we integrated critical narrative review findings with data from two discussion groups: qualitative researchers and research users/consumers. In the literature, we found that theoretical debate ran parallel to practical action rather than being integrated with it. We identified an important and novel theme of relationships that was emerging from the perspectives of researchers and users. Relationships were significant with respect to trust, sharing data, transparency and clarity, anonymity, permissions, and responsibility. We provide an example of practice development that we hope will prompt researchers to re-examine the issues in their own setting. Informing the research community of research practitioner and user perspectives on ethical issues in the reuse of qualitative data is the first step toward developing mechanisms to better integrate theoretical and empirical work.

Entities:  

Keywords:  data collection and management; ethics / moral perspectives; qualitative analysis; relationships, research

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24374332     DOI: 10.1177/1049732313518373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  10 in total

1.  How language barriers influence provider workload for home health care professionals: A secondary analysis of interview data.

Authors:  Allison Squires; Sarah Miner; Eva Liang; Maichou Lor; Chenjuan Ma; Amy Witkoski Stimpfel
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 5.837

2.  End-of-Life Decision Making in Palliative Care and Recommendations of the Council of Europe: Qualitative Secondary Analysis of Interviews and Observation Field Notes.

Authors:  Sandra Martins Pereira; Emília Fradique; Pablo Hernández-Marrero
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Examining Data Repository Guidelines for Qualitative Data Sharing.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Heidi A Walsh; Michelle Strait; Cynthia R Hudson-Vitale; James M DuBois
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-12-10       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  Seeing oneself as a data reuser: How subjectification activates the drivers of data reuse in science.

Authors:  Marcel LaFlamme; Marion Poetz; Daniel Spichtinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Research Participant Views regarding Qualitative Data Sharing.

Authors:  Jessica Mozersky; Meredith Parsons; Heidi Walsh; Kari Baldwin; Tristan McIntosh; James M DuBois
Journal:  Ethics Hum Res       Date:  2020-03

6.  Interpretive focus groups: a participatory method for interpreting and extending secondary analysis of qualitative data.

Authors:  Michelle Redman-MacLaren; Jane Mills; Rachael Tommbe
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 2.640

7.  What roles do male partners play in the mothering experiences of women living with mental illness? A qualitative secondary analysis.

Authors:  Emily Beard; Anne Honey; Nicola Hancock; Ruby Awram; Melissa Miceli; Rachel Mayes
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  Ethical Issues in Consent for the Reuse of Data in Health Data Platforms.

Authors:  Alex McKeown; Miranda Mourby; Paul Harrison; Sophie Walker; Mark Sheehan; Ilina Singh
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Qualitative Data Sharing: Participant Understanding, Motivation, and Consent.

Authors:  Alicia VandeVusse; Jennifer Mueller; Sebastian Karcher
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2021-12-01

10.  Barriers and facilitators to qualitative data sharing in the United States: A survey of qualitative researchers.

Authors:  Jessica Mozersky; Tristan McIntosh; Heidi A Walsh; Meredith V Parsons; Melody Goodman; James M DuBois
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.