| Literature DB >> 24373726 |
Allen F Morey1, Nick Watkin2, Ofer Shenfeld3, Ehab Eltahawy4, Carlos Giudice5.
Abstract
The management of primary and recurrent bulbar urethral stricture disease has been a source of controversy with the choice being between endoscopic urethrotomy and open urethroplasty. Further debate exists with regard to the choice of urethroplasty--either excision and primary anastomosis (EPA) or augmentation with a graft or flap. Using PubMed, a 35-year literature search was conducted (1975-2010) for peer-reviewed articles on bulbar strictures treated using EPA. Exclusions included articles with <10 patients, duplications, reviews, or in which the cohort was mixed and the data could not be separately analyzed. Seventeen articles fulfilled the criteria with a total of 1234 patients. Overall success was 93.8%. Reported complications were <5%, and there was no evidence of persistent loss of sexual function. The authors conclude that EPA is associated with a high success rate with low complication rate. Our recommendation is that it should be performed in patients with short isolated bulbar strictures, when expected success rates of other procedures are <90%.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24373726 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.11.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Urology ISSN: 0090-4295 Impact factor: 2.649