| Literature DB >> 24373280 |
Cheraghi Maria, Rahimi Zahra, Parsa Sara1.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Cervical-vaginal infection is one of the most common problems in clinical medicine .We aimed to determine the prevalence of cervical-vaginal infections in pap-smear samples from women in urban and rural areas.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24373280 PMCID: PMC4825389 DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v6n1p201
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob J Health Sci ISSN: 1916-9736
General characteristics of study participants (n=1448)
| Variable | Number | Percent | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Illiterate | 417 | 28.8 | |
| Elementary | 443 | 30.6 | |
| <High school | 253 | 17.5 | |
| High school or equal | 272 | 18.8 | |
| University degree | 63 | 4.4 | |
| <20 | 147 | 10.2 | |
| 21-30 | 631 | 43.6 | |
| 31-40 | 466 | 32.2 | |
| 41-50 | 163 | 11.3 | |
| >50 | 41 | 2.8 | |
| Urban | 809 | 55.9 | |
| Rural | 839 | 44.1 | |
Distribution of participants according to fertility characteristics (n=1436)
| Variable | Number | Percent | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No | 54 | 3.8 | |
| 1-3 | 941 | 65.6 | |
| 4-6 | 345 | 24 | |
| >6 | 96 | 6.6 | |
| No | 65 | 4.5 | |
| 1-3 | 988 | 68.8 | |
| 4-6 | 315 | 21.9 | |
| >6 | 68 | 4.8 | |
| No | 1193 | 83.1 | |
| 1-3 | 236 | 16.4 | |
| >3 | 7 | 0.5 | |
Distribution of participants according to the current method of contraception (n=1443)
| The methods of contraception | Number | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| 495 | 34.3 | |
| 102 | 7.1 | |
| 63 | 4.4 | |
| 47 | 3.2 | |
| 224 | 15.5 | |
| 10 | 7.6 | |
| 128 | 8.9 | |
| 169 | 11.7 | |
| 13 | 0.9 | |
| 92 | 6.4 |
Distribution of cases of cervical-vaginal infections based on demographic characteristics and contraceptive methods used
| | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | None pathogen | Other* | Total | |||||
| Illiterate | 187 (44.8%) | 1 (2.0%) | 3 (0.7%) | 187 (44.8%) | 6 (1.4%) | 185 (44.4%) | 417 | |
| Elementary | 192 (43.3%) | 1 (0.2%) | 4 (0.9%) | 192 (43.3%) | 4 (0.9%) | 212 (47.9%) | 443 | |
| Middle school | 85 (33.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (1.2%) | 85 (33.6%) | 2 (0.8%) | 147 (58.1%) | 253 | |
| High school or equal | 100 (36.8%) | 1 (0.4%) | 1 (0.4%) | 100 (36.8%) | 2 (0.7%) | 160 (58.8%) | 272 | |
| University degree | 100 (36.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 21 (33.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 40 (63.5%) | 63 | |
| <20 | 57 (38.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 14 (9.5%) | 1 (0.7%) | 2 (1.4%) | 73 (49.6%) | 147 | |
| 21-30 | 257 (40.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 40 (6.3%) | 7 (1.1%) | 4 (0.6%) | 323 (51.2%) | 631 | |
| 31-40 | 187 (40.1%) | 2 (0.4%) | 24 (5.2%) | 2 (0.4%) | 4 (0.9%) | 247 (53.0%) | 466 | |
| 41-50 | 65(39.9%) | 1 (0.6%) | 10 (6.1%) | 1 (0.6%) | 4 (2.5%) | 82 (50.3%) | 163 | |
| >50 | 19 (46.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (7.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 19 (46.3%) | 41 | |
| Urban | 271 (33.5%) | 2 (0.2%) | 34 (4.2%) | 8 (1.0%) | 11 (1.4%) | 483 (59.7%) | 809 | |
| Rural | 314 (49.1%) | 1 (0.2%) | 57 (8.9%) | 3 (0.5%) | 3 (0.5%) | 261 (40.8%) | 639 | |
| LD | 212 (42.8%) | 2 (0.4%) | 40 (8.1%) | 7 (1.4%) | 7 (1.4%) | 239 (48.3%) | 495 | |
| TP | 45 (44.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 7 (6.9%) | 1 (1.0%) | 3 (2.9%) | 46 (45.1%) | 102 | |
| DMPA | 34 (54.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 28 (44.4%) | 63 | |
| IUD | 10 (21.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (4.3%) | 2 (4.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 33 (70.1%) | 47 | |
| CONDOM | 89 (39.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 11 (4.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (0.9%) | 122 (54.5%) | 224 | |
| TL | 42 (38.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | 8 (7.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (1.8%) | 58 (52.7%) | 110 | |
| Natural | 50 (39.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 8 (6.3%) | 1 (0.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 69 (53.8%) | 128 | |
| None | 58 (34.3%) | 1 (0.6%) | 11 (6.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 99 (58.6%) | 169 | |
| Menopause | 4 (30.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 9 (69.2%) | 13 | |