Literature DB >> 24373019

A randomised, prospective double-blind, propiverine-controlled trial of imidafenacin in patients with overactive bladder.

C Park1, J Park, M-S Choo, J C Kim, J G Lee, J Z Lee, K-S Lee, D Y Kim, S-J Lee, J T Seo.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of imidafenacin compared with propiverine for treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) in Korean patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with OAB symptoms were randomised to double-blind treatment with 0.1 mg of imidafenacin twice daily (group A) or propiverine 20 mg once daily (group B) for 12-week regimen, and assessed for efficacy and safety. The primary efficacy outcome was per cent change of weekly urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes at week 12. The secondary efficacy outcomes were changes in the micturitions per day, urine volume voided per micturition, urgency episodes per day, complete disappearance of incontinence episodes and severity of urgency from baseline to week 12. Quality of life and safety profiles were also compared.
RESULTS: Of 162 patients randomised, 140 completed the study protocol. The per cent change of weekly UUI episodes at week 12 was -69.1% in group A and -70.4% in group B (both p < 0.0001). The lower limit of 95% one-sided confidence interval of the difference between the groups was above the non-inferiority margin (-19.42%). Other voiding parameters and quality of life significantly improved at week 12 in both the groups. The discontinuation rates caused by adverse events were low in both the groups. While dry mouth was the most common adverse event (group A: 28.4% vs. B: 30.4%, p = 0.783), the severity of dry mouth was significantly less in the group A than B (p = 0.042) There were no significant differences in other safety profiles.
CONCLUSIONS: After the 12-week treatment of imidafenacin 0.1 mg twice daily, all OAB symptoms and quality of life improved. Imidafenacin was not inferior to propiverine for the reduction of UUI episodes, and was better tolerated than propiverine in the safety profile. Our results indicate that imidafenacin is a safe and effective drug in Korean patients with OAB.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24373019     DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pract        ISSN: 1368-5031            Impact factor:   2.503


  4 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy and safety of imidafenacin for overactive bladder in adult: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Huantao Zong; Xin Zhou; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Exercise interventions improve depression and anxiety in chronic kidney disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thalita Lauanna Ferreira; Heitor Siqueira Ribeiro; Alexandre Lima Araújo Ribeiro; Ana Clara Bonini-Rocha; Joana Marcela Sales Lucena; Poliana Alves de Oliveira; Francisco Rafael S Amorim; Aparecido Pimentel Ferreira; Luiz Alexandre Viana Magno; Wagner Rodrigues Martins
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Innovative pharmacotherapies for women with overactive bladder: where are we now and what is in the pipeline?

Authors:  Emilio Sacco; Riccardo Bientinesi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Is imidafenacin an alternative to current antimuscarinic drugs for patients with overactive bladder syndrome?

Authors:  Jia-Pei Wu; Liao Peng; Xiao Zeng; Hao Li; Hong Shen; De-Yi Luo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.894

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.