Literature DB >> 24372784

Feedback provision, nurses' well-being and quality improvement: towards a conceptual framework.

Adriana P M Giesbers1,2, Roel L J Schouteten2, Erik Poutsma2, Beatrice I J M van der Heijden2,3,4, Theo van Achterberg5,6.   

Abstract

AIM: This contribution develops a conceptual framework that illustrates how feedback on quality measurements to nursing teams can be related to nurses' well-being and quality improvement.
BACKGROUND: It is assumed that providing nursing teams with feedback on quality measurements will lead to quality improvement. Research does not fully support this assumption. Additionally, previous empirical work shows that feedback on quality measurements may have alienating and demotivating effects on nurses. EVALUATION: This article uniquely integrates scholarly literature on feedback provision and strategic human resource management. KEY ISSUE: The relationship between feedback provision, nurses' well-being and quality improvement remains unclear from research until now.
CONCLUSION: Three perspectives are discussed that illustrate that feedback provision can result in quality improvement at the expense of or for the benefit of nurses' well-being. To better understand these contradictory effects, research should examine nurses' perceptions of feedback as mediating variables, while incorporating context factors as moderating variables. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nursing management can use feedback on quality measurements to nursing teams, as a tool for enhanced quality and as a motivating tool. However, nurses' perceptions and contextual variables are important for the actual success of feedback.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  feedback; nurses’ well-being; quality improvement; quality measurement

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24372784     DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Manag        ISSN: 0966-0429            Impact factor:   3.325


  5 in total

1.  Using Feedback Intervention Theory to Guide Clinical Dashboard Design.

Authors:  Dawn Dowding; Jacqueline Merrill; David Russell
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

2.  Stress of Dialysis Nurses-Analyzing the Buffering Role of Influence at Work and Feedback.

Authors:  Maren Kersten; Sylvie Vincent-Höper; Albert Nienhaus
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Healthcare Quality Improvement and 'work engagement'; concluding results from a national, longitudinal, cross-sectional study of the 'Productive Ward-Releasing Time to Care' Programme.

Authors:  Mark White; Tony Butterworth; John Sg Wells
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Measured and perceived effects of audit and feedback on nursing performance: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Émilie Dufour; Arnaud Duhoux; Jolianne Bolduc
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-01

5.  Do perceived working conditions and patient safety culture correlate with objective workload and patient outcomes: A cross-sectional explorative study from a German university hospital.

Authors:  Heidrun Sturm; Monika A Rieger; Peter Martus; Esther Ueding; Anke Wagner; Martin Holderried; Jens Maschmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.