Literature DB >> 24372691

The mechanisms and evidence of efficacy of electrical stimulation for healing of pressure ulcer: a systematic review.

Lisa Kawasaki1, Vivian K Mushahwar, Chester Ho, Sean P Dukelow, Leo L H Chan, K Ming Chan.   

Abstract

The objective of this article is to provide a systematic review of the efficacy of electrical stimulation in healing pressure ulcer and to review its mechanism of action. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, Medline, EMBASE, and NHS EED were searched for relevant interventional studies including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. A best-evidence synthesis was performed to summarize the results of the included studies. A total of seven RCTs and two observational studies met the inclusion criteria. Moderate level of evidence of efficacy with low risk of bias was shown in all seven RCTs. Although some studies have used continuous direct current, most other investigators opted to use high-voltage pulsed current to minimize the risk of skin burn and to achieve greater current penetration. Overall, the incidence of adverse effects was very low. Two studies that assessed the economic impacts of electrical stimulation revealed substantial health care cost savings. The mechanisms through which electrical stimulation exerts a positive effect on pressure ulcer healing are reasonably well established. Clinical trials have revealed a moderate level of evidence to support its use as an ancillary treatment modality for healing pressure ulcer. Recommendations regarding the optimal electrical stimulation parameters and dosage of use are provided. Further studies to investigate potential barriers that may impede widespread use in different clinical settings are needed.
© 2013 by the Wound Healing Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24372691     DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  14 in total

Review 1.  Wound Healing Devices Brief Vignettes.

Authors:  Caesar A Anderson; Marc A Hare; George A Perdrizet
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Electrical stimulation therapy for the treatment of pressure ulcers in individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Deena Lala; Sandi J Spaulding; Shauna M Burke; Pamela E Houghton
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Monophasic Pulsed Microcurrent of 1-8 Hz Increases the Number of Human Dermal Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Yoshikawa; Masaharu Sugimoto; Mikiko Uemura; Masafumi Matsuo; Noriaki Maeshige; Emma Tabe Eko Niba; Hisato Shuntoh
Journal:  Prog Rehabil Med       Date:  2016-10-26

4.  Electrical Shunting Prevents the Decline of Galvanotaxis After Monophasic Pulsed Microcurrent Stimulation in Human Dermal Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Mikiko Uemura; Masaharu Sugimoto; Yoshiyuki Yoshikawa; Rieko Inoue
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2022-07-12

5.  Systemic Evaluation of Electrical Stimulation for Ischemic Wound Therapy in a Preclinical In Vivo Model.

Authors:  Jennifer K Graebert; M Kristi Henzel; Kord S Honda; Kath M Bogie
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation acutely mobilizes endothelial progenitor cells in critically ill patients with sepsis.

Authors:  Christos Stefanou; Eleftherios Karatzanos; Georgios Mitsiou; Katerina Psarra; Epameinondas Angelopoulos; Stavros Dimopoulos; Vasiliki Gerovasili; Efstathios Boviatsis; Christina Routsi; Serafeim Nanas
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 6.925

7.  Electrical Stimulation for Pressure Injuries: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-11-08

8.  Electrical stimulation for treating pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Mohit Arora; Lisa A Harvey; Joanne V Glinsky; Lianne Nier; Lucija Lavrencic; Annette Kifley; Ian D Cameron
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-22

9.  Electric Factors in Wound Healing.

Authors:  Paulo Luiz Farber; Felipe Contoli Isoldi; Lydia Masako Ferreira
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.947

10.  Monophasic Pulsed 200-μA Current Promotes Galvanotaxis With Polarization of Actin Filament and Integrin α2β1 in Human Dermal Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Mikiko Uemura; Noriaki Maeshige; Yuka Koga; Michiko Ishikawa-Aoyama; Makoto Miyoshi; Masaharu Sugimoto; Hiroto Terashi; Makoto Usami
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2016-01-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.