Literature DB >> 24372621

Doping in sports: knowledge and attitudes among parents of Austrian junior athletes.

C Blank1, V Leichtfried, R Schaiter, C Fürhapter, D Müller, W Schobersberger.   

Abstract

Strategies for doping prevention are based on prior identification of opportunities for intervention. There is no current research focusing on the potential role in doping prevention, which might be played by the parents of junior elite athletes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes toward doping among parents of Austrian junior athletes and to analyze factors potentially influencing these beliefs. In this study, two questionnaires were distributed to 1818 student athletes, each with instructions that these surveys were to be completed by their parents (n(total) = 3636). Parents filled in questionnaires at home without observation. Responses from 883 parents were included in this analysis. Compared to female parents, male parents demonstrated significantly better knowledge about doping and its side effects and were more likely to be influenced by their own sporting careers and amounts of sports activities per week. Parental sex did not demonstrate a significant influence on responses reflecting attitudes toward doping. Additional research is needed to compare these results with young athletes' knowledge and attitudes to determine if and to what degree parental attitudes and beliefs influence the behavior and attitudes of their children.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prohibited substances; attitude influences; prevention; side effects

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24372621     DOI: 10.1111/sms.12168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports        ISSN: 0905-7188            Impact factor:   4.221


  6 in total

1.  Feasibility randomised controlled trial examining the effects of the Anti-Doping Values in Coach Education (ADVICE) mobile application on doping knowledge and attitudes towards doping among grassroots coaches.

Authors:  Adam Robert Nicholls; Lucas R W Fairs; Mar Plata-Andrés; Richard Bailey; Edward Cope; Daniel Madigan; Katrin Koenen; Iva Glibo; Nikolaos C Theodorou; Jean-Francois Laurent; Gaetan Garcia; Benoit Chanal
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2020-10-01

2.  Health Psychological Constructs as Predictors of Doping Susceptibility in Adolescent Athletes.

Authors:  Cornelia Blank; Wolfgang Schobersberger; Veronika Leichtfried; Stefan Duschek
Journal:  Asian J Sports Med       Date:  2016-10-24

3.  Knowledge and experience of Kazakhstan athletes in anti-doping and the impact of past educational intervention.

Authors:  Galiya Zhumabayeva; Gulnara Kapanova; Denis Vinnikov; Maira Bakasheva; Venera Abdulla; Andrej Grjibovski
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2022-04-26

4.  How the Iranian Football Coaches and Players Know About Doping?

Authors:  Tohid Seif Barghi; Farzin Halabchi; Jiri Dvorak; Heydar Hosseinnejad
Journal:  Asian J Sports Med       Date:  2015-06-20

5.  Children's First Experience of Taking Anabolic-Androgenic Steroids can Occur before Their 10th Birthday: A Systematic Review Identifying 9 Factors That Predicted Doping among Young People.

Authors:  Adam R Nicholls; Ed Cope; Richard Bailey; Katrin Koenen; Detlef Dumon; Nikolaos C Theodorou; Benoit Chanal; Delphine Saint Laurent; David Müller; Mar P Andrés; Annemarie H Kristensen; Mark A Thompson; Wolfgang Baumann; Jean-Francois Laurent
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-20

6.  Identification of Factors Associated with Potential Doping Behavior in Sports: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in High-Level Competitive Swimmers.

Authors:  Sime Devcic; Jakob Bednarik; Dora Maric; Sime Versic; Damir Sekulic; Zvonimir Kutlesa; Antonino Bianco; Jelena Rodek; Silvester Liposek
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.