Literature DB >> 24372606

Rapid evolution of cheating mitochondrial genomes in small yeast populations.

Jean-Nicolas Jasmin1, Clifford Zeyl.   

Abstract

Outcrossed sex exposes genes to competition with their homologues, allowing alleles that transmit more often than their competitors to spread despite organismal fitness costs. Mitochondrial populations in species with biparental inheritance are thought to be especially susceptible to such cheaters because they lack strict transmission rules like meiosis or maternal inheritance. Yet the interaction between mutation and natural selection in the evolution of cheating mitochondrial genomes has not been tested experimentally. Using yeast experimental populations, we show that although cheaters were rare in a large sample of spontaneous respiratory-deficient mitochondrial mutations (petites), cheaters evolve under experimentally enforced outcrossing even when mutation supply and selection are restricted by repeatedly bottlenecking populations.
© 2013 The Author(s). Evolution © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost of sex; experimental evolution; genetic conflicts; mitochondrial genetics; selfish genetic elements; symbiosis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24372606     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  11 in total

Review 1.  Selfish Mitonuclear Conflict.

Authors:  Justin C Havird; Evan S Forsythe; Alissa M Williams; John H Werren; Damian K Dowling; Daniel B Sloan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  What cost mitochondria? The maintenance of functional mitochondrial DNA within and across generations.

Authors:  Duur K Aanen; Johannes N Spelbrink; Madeleine Beekman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Regular bottlenecks and restrictions to somatic fusion prevent the accumulation of mitochondrial defects in Neurospora.

Authors:  E Bastiaans; D K Aanen; A J M Debets; R F Hoekstra; B Lestrade; M F P M Maas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Co-evolution in the Jungle: From Leafcutter Ant Colonies to Chromosomal Ends.

Authors:  Ľubomír Tomáška; Jozef Nosek
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 5.  Intracellular quality control of mitochondrial DNA: evidence and limitations.

Authors:  Dmitry A Knorre
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The conflict within: origin, proliferation and persistence of a spontaneously arising selfish mitochondrial genome.

Authors:  Joseph James Dubie; Avery Robert Caraway; McKenna Margaret Stout; Vaishali Katju; Ulfar Bergthorsson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Homeostatic Responses Regulate Selfish Mitochondrial Genome Dynamics in C. elegans.

Authors:  Bryan L Gitschlag; Cait S Kirby; David C Samuels; Rama D Gangula; Simon A Mallal; Maulik R Patel
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 27.287

Review 8.  The Red Queen in mitochondria: cyto-nuclear co-evolution, hybrid breakdown and human disease.

Authors:  Jui-Yu Chou; Jun-Yi Leu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Acknowledging selection at sub-organismal levels resolves controversy on pro-cooperation mechanisms.

Authors:  Wenying Shou
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Selfish drive can trump function when animal mitochondrial genomes compete.

Authors:  Hansong Ma; Patrick H O'Farrell
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 38.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.