Literature DB >> 24372045

An examination of the historical context of interprofessional collaboration in Dutch obstetrical care.

Nadine van der Lee1, Erik W Driessen, Eddy S Houwaart, Nicolette C Caccia, Fedde Scheele.   

Abstract

Collaboration between different groups of health care professionals is often rooted in a long and often difficult history. This history can exert a strong influence on how professionals collaborate and historical tensions can contribute to problems in contemporary practice. However, literature about interprofessional collaboration often ignores the historical underpinnings of collaboration. In this paper, the historical development of interprofessional collaboration between obstetricians and midwives within the setting of Dutch obstetrical care is explored using a review of Dutch and English literature for documents explicitly or implicitly describing the historical development of this collaboration. This literature delineates the establishment of professional boundaries and the formalization of the collaboration between the two professions. It also details the history of physician domination over the midwives both in midwifery practice and education and the relatively recent reversal of this situation. Moreover, the shift in collaborative partner from general practitioner to obstetrician and its effect on collaboration is examined. Insight into the historical foundations of Dutch maternity care collaboration may allow us to understand the origins, and thus formulate possible solutions, for contemporary problems within this collaboration.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24372045     DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2013.869196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interprof Care        ISSN: 1356-1820            Impact factor:   2.338


  5 in total

1.  Clinicians' views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a qualitative study from countries with high VBAC rates.

Authors:  Ingela Lundgren; Evelien van Limbeek; Katri Vehvilainen-Julkunen; Christina Nilsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Complex social intervention for multidisciplinary teams to improve patient referrals in obstetrical care: protocol for a stepped wedge study design.

Authors:  Anita Romijn; Martine C de Bruijne; Pim W Teunissen; Christianne J M de Groot; Cordula Wagner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  The risk matrix approach: a helpful tool weighing probability and impact when deciding on preventive and diagnostic interventions.

Authors:  Stéphanie M P Lemmens; Veronica A Lopes van Balen; Yvonne C M Röselaers; Hubertina C J Scheepers; Marc E A Spaanderman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Opinions of maternity care professionals and other stakeholders about integration of maternity care: a qualitative study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Hilde Perdok; Suze Jans; Corine Verhoeven; Lidewij Henneman; Therese Wiegers; Ben Willem Mol; François Schellevis; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Social Network Analysis Applied to a Historical Ethnographic Study Surrounding Home Birth.

Authors:  Elena Andina-Diaz; Mª Antonia Ovalle-Perandones; Ignacio Ramos-Vidal; Francisca Camacho-Morell; Jose Siles-Gonzalez; Pilar Marques-Sanchez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.