BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) represents an emerging pathology in modern medicine. Transthoracic echocardiography is an inexpensive and reproducible method and it is the most commonly used non-invasive diagnostic tool to asses pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and the function of the right ventricle. Although, the right heart catheterization is still considered as the standard for the diagnosis, according to the last guidelines, the new echocardiographic methods may offer an improved value in the PAH evaluation. AIM: To evaluate if cardiac ultrasonography data correlate with catheterization results in patients with PAH (Group I Dana Point 2008), and to compare the ultrasonography evaluation of PAH patients with that of normal. METHODS: 15 consecutive patients (pts) (52±15 yrs, 5 men, time from onset of symptoms 1.6±1.7 years) with PAH of different aetiologies (12 pts with idiopathic PAH, 2 pts with PAH associated with scleroderma and one with persistent PAH after atrial septal defect (ASD) closure) were evaluated through: 1. clinical examination (NYHA class); 2. exercise capacity (6 minute walking test - 6MWT); 3. conventional echocardiography (diameter of right ventricle - RVD and right atrium, fractional area shortening - FAS, TAPSE, pulmonary ascension time - PA, systolic and mean PAP -sPAP, mPAP, tricuspid E/A ratio, cardiac index-CI) and 4. Tissue Doppler Imaging - TDI (systolic and diastolic myocardial velocities at the tricuspid annulus - S, D, A); 5. right heart catheterization (sPAP, mPAP, CI, pulmonary vascular resistance - PVR)We compared classical and TDI echo parameters with those obtained from 15 normal subjects, matched in age and sex. RESULTS: PAH patients had high sPAP and mPAP with right heart dilation (RV - 44.8±7.3 mm), depressed TAPSE (16.2±5.9 mm) and cardiac index and low TDI systolic velocities at tricuspid level (7.3±2.9 cm/s). All parameters differed statistically significant from normal. There were no significant correlations between ultrasonography and catheterization (cath) parameters (sPAP 92±28.2 echo vs. 106.4±25.8 mmHg cath; mPAP 47.9±8.4 echo vs. 65.8±17.3 mmHg cath), excepting for CI 2.3±1.2 l/min/m(2) vs. 2.08±0.3 ml/min/m(2)) and PVR (16.5 ± 15.3 Wood U echo, vs. 19.6 ± 7.9 cath). CONCLUSION: Classic and TDI cardiac ultrasonography represents a good screening and monitoring tool for PAH patients, but tends to underestimate the severity of the disease, leaving right heart catheterization as the essential diagnostic method for this rare disease.
BACKGROUND:Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) represents an emerging pathology in modern medicine. Transthoracic echocardiography is an inexpensive and reproducible method and it is the most commonly used non-invasive diagnostic tool to asses pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and the function of the right ventricle. Although, the right heart catheterization is still considered as the standard for the diagnosis, according to the last guidelines, the new echocardiographic methods may offer an improved value in the PAH evaluation. AIM: To evaluate if cardiac ultrasonography data correlate with catheterization results in patients with PAH (Group I Dana Point 2008), and to compare the ultrasonography evaluation of PAH patients with that of normal. METHODS: 15 consecutive patients (pts) (52±15 yrs, 5 men, time from onset of symptoms 1.6±1.7 years) with PAH of different aetiologies (12 pts with idiopathic PAH, 2 pts with PAH associated with scleroderma and one with persistent PAH after atrial septal defect (ASD) closure) were evaluated through: 1. clinical examination (NYHA class); 2. exercise capacity (6 minute walking test - 6MWT); 3. conventional echocardiography (diameter of right ventricle - RVD and right atrium, fractional area shortening - FAS, TAPSE, pulmonary ascension time - PA, systolic and mean PAP -sPAP, mPAP, tricuspid E/A ratio, cardiac index-CI) and 4. Tissue Doppler Imaging - TDI (systolic and diastolic myocardial velocities at the tricuspid annulus - S, D, A); 5. right heart catheterization (sPAP, mPAP, CI, pulmonary vascular resistance - PVR)We compared classical and TDI echo parameters with those obtained from 15 normal subjects, matched in age and sex. RESULTS: PAH patients had high sPAP and mPAP with right heart dilation (RV - 44.8±7.3 mm), depressed TAPSE (16.2±5.9 mm) and cardiac index and low TDI systolic velocities at tricuspid level (7.3±2.9 cm/s). All parameters differed statistically significant from normal. There were no significant correlations between ultrasonography and catheterization (cath) parameters (sPAP 92±28.2 echo vs. 106.4±25.8 mmHg cath; mPAP 47.9±8.4 echo vs. 65.8±17.3 mmHg cath), excepting for CI 2.3±1.2 l/min/m(2) vs. 2.08±0.3 ml/min/m(2)) and PVR (16.5 ± 15.3 Wood U echo, vs. 19.6 ± 7.9 cath). CONCLUSION: Classic and TDI cardiac ultrasonography represents a good screening and monitoring tool for PAH patients, but tends to underestimate the severity of the disease, leaving right heart catheterization as the essential diagnostic method for this rare disease.
Authors: Alan L Hinderliter; Park W Willis; Walker A Long; William R Clarke; David Ralph; Edgar J Caldwell; William Williams; Neil A Ettinger; Nicholas S Hill; Warren R Summer; Bennett de Boisblanc; Gary Koch; Shu Li; Linda M Clayton; Maria M Jöbsis; James W Crow Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2003-04-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Darryl Miller; Michel G Farah; Anna Liner; Keith Fox; Mark Schluchter; Brian D Hoit Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Micah R Fisher; Paul R Forfia; Elzbieta Chamera; Traci Housten-Harris; Hunter C Champion; Reda E Girgis; Mary C Corretti; Paul M Hassoun Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-01-22 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Gérald Simonneau; Ivan M Robbins; Maurice Beghetti; Richard N Channick; Marion Delcroix; Christopher P Denton; C Gregory Elliott; Sean P Gaine; Mark T Gladwin; Zhi-Cheng Jing; Michael J Krowka; David Langleben; Norifumi Nakanishi; Rogério Souza Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Adrian C Borges; Fabian Knebel; Stephan Eddicks; Alexander Panda; Sebastian Schattke; Christian Witt; Gert Baumann Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2006-06-27 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: G R Sutherland; M J Stewart; K W Groundstroem; C M Moran; A Fleming; F J Guell-Peris; R A Riemersma; L N Fenn; K A Fox; W N McDicken Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 1994 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: P J Currie; J B Seward; K L Chan; D A Fyfe; D J Hagler; D D Mair; G S Reeder; R A Nishimura; A J Tajik Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1985-10 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Ronald J Raymond; Alan L Hinderliter; Park W Willis; David Ralph; Edgar J Caldwell; William Williams; Neil A Ettinger; Nicholas S Hill; Warren R Summer; Bennett de Boisblanc; Todd Schwartz; Gary Koch; Linda M Clayton; Maria M Jöbsis; James W Crow; Walker Long Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-04-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Nazzareno Galiè; Marius M Hoeper; Marc Humbert; Adam Torbicki; Jean-Luc Vachiery; Joan Albert Barbera; Maurice Beghetti; Paul Corris; Sean Gaine; J Simon Gibbs; Miguel Angel Gomez-Sanchez; Guillaume Jondeau; Walter Klepetko; Christian Opitz; Andrew Peacock; Lewis Rubin; Michael Zellweger; Gerald Simonneau Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2009-08-27 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Sathish Parasuraman; Seamus Walker; Brodie L Loudon; Nicholas D Gollop; Andrew M Wilson; Crystal Lowery; Michael P Frenneaux Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Date: 2016-07-04