Literature DB >> 24371155

Assimilating genome-scale metabolic reconstructions with modelBorgifier.

John T Sauls1, Joerg M Buescher.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Genome-scale reconstructions and models, as collections of genomic and metabolic information, provide a useful means to compare organisms. Comparison requires that models are similarly notated to pair shared components. RESULT: Matching and comparison of genome-scale reconstructions and models are facilitated by modelBorgifier. It reconciles models in light of different annotation schemes, allowing diverse models to become useful for synchronous investigation.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The modelBorgifier toolbox is freely available at http://www.brain-biotech.de/downloads/modelBorgifier.zip.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24371155     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  7 in total

1.  Comparative Analysis of Yeast Metabolic Network Models Highlights Progress, Opportunities for Metabolic Reconstruction.

Authors:  Benjamin D Heavner; Nathan D Price
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Creation and analysis of biochemical constraint-based models using the COBRA Toolbox v.3.0.

Authors:  Laurent Heirendt; Sylvain Arreckx; Thomas Pfau; Sebastián N Mendoza; Anne Richelle; Almut Heinken; Hulda S Haraldsdóttir; Jacek Wachowiak; Sarah M Keating; Vanja Vlasov; Stefania Magnusdóttir; Chiam Yu Ng; German Preciat; Alise Žagare; Siu H J Chan; Maike K Aurich; Catherine M Clancy; Jennifer Modamio; John T Sauls; Alberto Noronha; Aarash Bordbar; Benjamin Cousins; Diana C El Assal; Luis V Valcarcel; Iñigo Apaolaza; Susan Ghaderi; Masoud Ahookhosh; Marouen Ben Guebila; Andrejs Kostromins; Nicolas Sompairac; Hoai M Le; Ding Ma; Yuekai Sun; Lin Wang; James T Yurkovich; Miguel A P Oliveira; Phan T Vuong; Lemmer P El Assal; Inna Kuperstein; Andrei Zinovyev; H Scott Hinton; William A Bryant; Francisco J Aragón Artacho; Francisco J Planes; Egils Stalidzans; Alejandro Maass; Santosh Vempala; Michael Hucka; Michael A Saunders; Costas D Maranas; Nathan E Lewis; Thomas Sauter; Bernhard Ø Palsson; Ines Thiele; Ronan M T Fleming
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  Genome-Scale Model Reveals Metabolic Basis of Biomass Partitioning in a Model Diatom.

Authors:  Jennifer Levering; Jared Broddrick; Christopher L Dupont; Graham Peers; Karen Beeri; Joshua Mayers; Alessandra A Gallina; Andrew E Allen; Bernhard O Palsson; Karsten Zengler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Integration of Biomass Formulations of Genome-Scale Metabolic Models with Experimental Data Reveals Universally Essential Cofactors in Prokaryotes.

Authors:  Joana C Xavier; Kiran Raosaheb Patil; Isabel Rocha
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 9.783

5.  A systematic assessment of current genome-scale metabolic reconstruction tools.

Authors:  Sebastián N Mendoza; Brett G Olivier; Douwe Molenaar; Bas Teusink
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 13.583

6.  Integration and Validation of the Genome-Scale Metabolic Models of Pichia pastoris: A Comprehensive Update of Protein Glycosylation Pathways, Lipid and Energy Metabolism.

Authors:  Màrius Tomàs-Gamisans; Pau Ferrer; Joan Albiol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  RAVEN 2.0: A versatile toolbox for metabolic network reconstruction and a case study on Streptomyces coelicolor.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Simonas Marcišauskas; Benjamín J Sánchez; Iván Domenzain; Daniel Hermansson; Rasmus Agren; Jens Nielsen; Eduard J Kerkhoven
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.