Literature DB >> 24370986

Comparison of the kinetics of lipopeptide production by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens XZ-173 in solid-state fermentation under isothermal and non-isothermal conditions.

Zhen Zhu1, Lifei Sun, Xiaolei Huang, Wei Ran, Qirong Shen.   

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the kinetics of lipopeptide production in solid-state fermentation (SSF) under isothermal and non-isothermal conditions. Models based on the logistic, modified Gompertz and Luedeking-Piret-like equations were developed to describe the time course of fermentation under different conditions. The experiments were conducted in 250 mL flasks and a 50 L fermenter. The results showed that the non-isothermal process had higher levels of product formation rate and substrate utilization rate compared to the isothermal process. The part of substrate carbon to meet microbial maintenance-energy, biomass and lipopeptides formation requirements got increased using the non-isothermal technique. In addition, fermenter conditions positively influenced the lipopeptides formation rate with significantly higher levels of substrate for the microbial growth and product formation, though the product productivity and biomass both decreased as compared to flask. This is the first report that investigates the effects of temperature changing on the kinetics of lipopeptide production by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain under SSF condition using soybean flour and rice straw as major substrates in flask and in fermenter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24370986     DOI: 10.1007/s11274-013-1587-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0959-3993            Impact factor:   3.312


  19 in total

1.  Analysis of the logistic function model: derivation and applications specific to batch cultured microorganisms.

Authors:  Daniel E Wachenheim; John A Patterson; Michael R Ladisch
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 2.  Recent applications of biosurfactants as biological and immunological molecules.

Authors:  Swaranjit Singh Cameotra; Randhir S Makkar
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.934

3.  Production of lipopeptides by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens XZ-173 in solid state fermentation using soybean flour and rice straw as the substrate.

Authors:  Zhen Zhu; Guoyi Zhang; Yi Luo; Wei Ran; Qirong Shen
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 9.642

4.  Kinetic modeling of batch hydrogen production process by mixed anaerobic cultures.

Authors:  Yang Mu; Gang Wang; Han-Qing Yu
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 5.  Solid-state fermentation--are there any biotechnological advantages?

Authors:  Udo Hölker; Jürgen Lenz
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.934

6.  Mathematical model of Chlorella minutissima UTEX2341 growth and lipid production under photoheterotrophic fermentation conditions.

Authors:  JinShui Yang; Ehsan Rasa; Prapakorn Tantayotai; Kate M Scow; HongLi Yuan; Krassimira R Hristova
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 9.642

7.  Biohydrogen production as a function of pH and substrate concentration.

Authors:  S V Ginkel; S Sung; J J Lay
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Gene yerP, involved in surfactin self-resistance in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  K Tsuge; Y Ohata; M Shoda
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Physiological and technological aspects of large-scale heterologous-protein production with yeasts.

Authors:  M C Hensing; R J Rouwenhorst; J J Heijnen; J P van Dijken; J T Pronk
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.271

10.  Leakage and lysis of lipid membranes induced by the lipopeptide surfactin.

Authors:  Heiko Heerklotz; Joachim Seelig
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 2.095

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.