| Literature DB >> 24370599 |
João Baptista Humbwavali1, Camila Giugliani, Bruce Bartholow Duncan, Erno Harzheim, Antônio Carlile Holanda Lavor, Míria Campos Lavor, Maria Idalice Barbosa, Patrícia Barros Thomas, Lisiane Hauser.
Abstract
Population health data available in Angola are often insufficient to guide the planning of health interventions. To address this gap, the goal of the present study was to investigate the health of mothers and infants in a suburban municipality in Luanda (Cacuaco), in order to provide a baseline for future comparisons. This was a prevalence study investigating infants younger than 2 years of age and their mothers. Mothers were interviewed, and children's height and weight were measured. Of 749 mothers interviewed, 98.5% (95% CI 98.2-99.1%) had at least one prenatal visit and 51.7% (95% CI 47.4-56.3%) had a health card. Most mothers with a health card had their first prenatal visit before the 20th week of pregnancy, and had at least four prenatal visits; 81.1% (95% CI 78.3-84.1%) of mothers also had their child's health card. Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months was 19% (95% CI 16.2-23.1%). Prevalence of low height-for-age and low BMI-for-age were 32 and 6%, respectively. Mothers with higher education levels were more likely to have had their first prenatal visit earlier, to have had more prenatal visits, to have given birth at a health facility, and to have her own and her child's health cards. Results showed a high prevalence of prenatal care and a low frequency of acute malnutrition. Maternal education level, among factors studied, was the predominant correlate of more positive health behaviors. These findings suggest important progress of mother and child health in Cacuaco, and may serve as a baseline for the planning of health interventions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24370599 PMCID: PMC4000416 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-013-9808-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Community Health ISSN: 0094-5145
Socio demographic and economic characteristics of mothers and infants under 2 years in the Cacuaco municipality, 2010 (N = 749)
| Variablea | N (%) or mean | 95 % CI or SD |
|---|---|---|
| Mother’s age (years) | 26.1 | ±6.2 |
| Child’s age (months) | 10.6 | ±6.9 |
| Child age range (months) | ||
| 0–6 | 269 (36.0) | 32.5–36.9 % |
| 7–12 | 152 (20.3) | 17.6–23.3 % |
| 13–18 | 200 (26.7) | 23.7–29.7 % |
| 19–24 | 127 (17.1) | 14.3–19.8 % |
| Mother’s marital status | ||
| Married/common law | 639 (85.3) | 82.6–87.9 % |
| Separated/divorced | 32 (4.3) | 3.1–5.7 % |
| Widowed | 2 (0.3) | 0.0–0.7 % |
| Mother’s education level | ||
| 0–4 years | 317 (42.5) | 38.9–45.8 % |
| 5–8 years | 310 (41.6) | 37.9–45.2 % |
| 9 or more years | 119 (16.0) | 13.4–18.5 % |
| Partner’s education level | ||
| 0–4 years | 34 (6.9) | 4.5–9.3 % |
| 5–8 years | 212 (42.9) | 38.3–7.2 % |
| 9 or more years | 248 (50.2) | 46.0–54.5 % |
| Mother’s occupation | ||
| Housewife | 316 (42.4) | 38.8–46.0 % |
| Self-employed | 327 (43.9) | 40.3–47.2 % |
| Public sector employee | 12 (1.6) | 0.8–2.6 % |
| Private sector employee | 23 (3.1) | 2.0–4.4 % |
| Student only | 67 (9.0) | 7.0–11.1 % |
| Partner’s occupation | ||
| Public sector employee | 165 (25.2) | 22.0–28.7 % |
| Private sector employee | 331 (50.5) | 46.4–54.4 % |
| Self-employed | 129 (19.7) | 16.5–22.7 % |
| Student only | 8 (1.2) | 0.5–2.1 % |
| Unemployed | 22 (3.4) | 2.0–4.9 % |
| Living arrangement | ||
| Own home | 457 (61.0) | 57.5–60.4 % |
| Rented home | 261 (34.8) | 31.6–38.3 % |
| Occupied home | 31 (4.1) | 2.7–5.5 % |
| Toilet facilities available | ||
| Yes | 728 (97.2) | 95.9–98.4 % |
| No | 21 (2.8) | 1.6–4.1 % |
| Toilet location | ||
| Inside the home | 55 (7.6) | 5.6–9.6 % |
| Outside the home, family use only | 303 (41.6) | 38.2–45.5 % |
| Outside the home, shared with other families | 370 (50.8) | 47.3–54.4 % |
| Source of water in the house | ||
| Pipe borne | 20 (2.7) | 1.6–3.9 % |
| Cistern (shared) | 26 (3.6) | 2.2–4.9 % |
| River/lake/canal | 1 (0.1) | 0.0–0.4 % |
| Spring (shared) | 305 (40.8) | 37.3–44.3 % |
| Tank (shared) | 385 (52.8) | 49.4–56.4 % |
| Other | 12 (1.6) | 0.8–2.6 % |
| Drinking water treatment—mother information | ||
| Boiled | 30 (4.0) | 2.7–5.6 % |
| Hypochlorite treatment | 537 (71.7) | 68.5–74.9 % |
| Filtered | 1 (0.1) | 0.0–0.4 % |
| No treatment | 181 (24.2) | 21.0–27.2 % |
| Presence of hypochlorite in the home—interviewer observationb | ||
| Yes | 259 (60.9) | 56.2–66.1 % |
| No | 166 (39.1) | 33.9–43.8 % |
| Presence of mosquito nets in the home—interviewer observation | ||
| Yes | 383 (51.1) | 46.2–56.1 % |
| No | 366 (48.9) | 44.0–54.1 % |
| Source of electricity | ||
| Supply network | 521 (69.5) | 61.2–77.18 % |
| Generator | 125 (16.7) | 11.0–22.3 % |
| No electricity | 103 (13.8) | 10.1–18.4 % |
| Presence of a refrigerator in the home | ||
| Yes | 446 (59.5) | 53.0–66.7 % |
| No | 303 (40.5) | 34.1–47.0 % |
| Presence of a television in the home | ||
| Yes | 662 (88.4) | 86.0–90.5 % |
| No | 87 (11.6) | 9.5–14.0 % |
| Means of garbage disposal | ||
| Collected by the city | 248 (33.2) | 30.0–36.7 % |
| Discarded outside the home | 482 (64.6) | 61.1–68.0 % |
| Discarded in yard around the home | 3 (0.4) | 0.0–0.9 % |
| Burning | 11 (1.5) | 0.7–2.4 % |
| Other | 2 (0.3) | 0.0–0.7 % |
| Family socioeconomic score (0–10) | ||
| Higher income (6–10) | 387 (51.7) | 47.9–55.5 % |
| Lower income (0–5) | 362 (48.3) | 44.5–52.1 % |
N number of subjects
aN may vary according to the data available for each variable
bN refers to the occasions in which it was possible to investigate the presence of hypochlorite in the home at the time of the interview
Health data for mothers living in the Cacuaco municipality 2010 (N = 749)
| Variablea | N(%) or mean | 95 % CI or SD |
|---|---|---|
| Number of children per mother | 3.6 | ±2.4 |
| Number of live children | 3.1 | ±1.9 |
| Number of dead children | 0.5 | ±0.9 |
| Number of stillbirths | 0.1 | ±0.3 |
| Interval between births (months) | 39.1 | ±23.5 |
| History of abortion | ||
| Yes | 148 (19.8) | 17.0–22.7 % |
| No | 601 (80.2) | 77.3–83.0 % |
| Number of abortions per mother | 0.3 | ±0.7 |
| At least one prenatal visit (mother information) | ||
| Yes | 720 (98.5) | 97.6–99.3 % |
| No | 11 (1.5) | 1.0–2.3 % |
| Prenatal care in public health service | 702 (96) | 94.7–97.4 % |
| At least four prenatal visits—pregnancy health card | 223 (60.4) | 55.3–65.6 % |
| At least six prenatal visits (mother information) | 71 (19.2) | 15.7–23.3 % |
| First prenatal visit before 20th week of pregnancy | 257 (76.5) | 70.1–80.4 % |
| Adequate prenatal care—Kessner index | 62 (16.9) | 13.1–21.0 % |
| Pregnancy health card ownership—verified by interviewer | ||
| Yes | 373 (51.7) | 47.1–56.4 % |
| No | 349 (48.3) | 44.2–53.1 % |
| Received tetanus vaccine during pregnancy (according to the mother’s health card) | ||
| Yes. at least one dose | 350 (96.7) | 95.1–99.3 % |
| Not necessary. As the mother had already received the vaccine | 1 (0.3) | 0.0–0.4 % |
| Not registered on the health card | 11 (3.0) | 1.0–5.2 % |
| Malaria prevention treatmentb (according to the mother’s health card) | ||
| Yes (one dose) | 101 (28.1) | 22.3–34.2 % |
| Yes (two or more doses) | 247 (68.6) | 62.1–75.8 % |
| Not registered on the health card | 12 (3.3) | 1.0––5.4 % |
| Supplementation with iron and/or folic acid (according to the mother’s health card) | ||
| Yes | 367 (99.2) | 98.0–100 % |
| Not registered on the health card | 3 (0.8) | 0.0–2.1 % |
| Postnatal visit (according to the mother’s health card) | ||
| Yes | 9 (3.6) | 1.1–6.3 % |
| No | 241 (96.4) | 94.1–99.5 % |
| Type of delivery (mother information) | ||
| Spontaneous | 711 (94.9) | 93.2–95.3 % |
| Cesarean | 38 (5.1 %) | 4.1–7.3 % |
| Place of delivery (mother information) | ||
| Health facility | 520 (69.5) | 64.1–75.3 % |
| At home | 228 (30.5) | 25.2–36.5 % |
aN may vary according to the data available for each variable
bPreventive Intermittent Treatment: recommended to all pregnant women in the country. Consists of at least two doses of anti-malaria drugs (in Angola, involved treatment with 500 mg sulfadoxine and 25 mg pyrimethamine at the time of data collection)
Health data for children living in the Cacuaco municipality. 2010 (N = 749)
| Variablea | N (%) or mean | 95 % CI or SD |
|---|---|---|
| Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months | 51 (19) | 16.2–23.1 % |
| Prevalence of breastfeeding at 12 monthsb | 90 (73) | 65.3–81.0 % |
| Ownership of child health card (verified by interviewer) | ||
| Yes | 602 (81.1) | 78.3–84.1 % |
| No | 140 (18.9) | 16.1–22.3 % |
| Birth weight (g) (according to the child’s health card) | 3,262.4 | ± 518.7 |
| <2,500 g | 39 (8.5) | 5.9–10.9 % |
| 2,500–4,000 g | 395 (86.4) | 83.4–89.7 % |
| >4,000 g | 23 (5.0) | 3.1–7.0 % |
| BCG vaccinec | ||
| Up to date | 570 (96.3) | 94.6–97.6 % |
| Delayed | 22 (3.7) | 2.4–5.4 % |
| Poliomyelitis vaccine—3rd dosec | ||
| Up to date | 198 (75.9) | 70.2–82.1 % |
| Delayed | 63 (24.1) | 19.0–30.2 % |
| Pentavalent vaccine 3rd dosec | ||
| Up to date | 199 (74.0) | 68.1–80.3 % |
| Delayed | 70 (26.0) | 20.0–32.1 % |
| Mumps vaccinec | ||
| Up to date | 141 (67.5) | 60.3–75.2 % |
| Delayed | 68 (32.5) | 25.1–41.0 % |
| Yellow fever vaccinec | ||
| Up to date | 111 (60.7) | 53.1–69.8 % |
| Delayed | 72 (39.3) | 31.2–47.1 % |
| Weight registers (according to the child’s health card) | ||
| Up to date | 426 (71.2) | 68.1–75.2 % |
| Delayed | 172 (28.8) | 25.4–32.1 % |
| Height-for-aged | ||
| Z score < −3.0 (very low) | 96 (13.2) | 10.8–15.7 % |
| Z score between −3.0 and −2.01 (low) | 136 (18.8) | 15.7–21.7 % |
| Z score between −2.0 and −1.01 (low to normal) | 194 (26.8) | 23.4–30.2 % |
| Z score between −1.0 and 1.0 (normal) | 243 (33.5) | 30.3–37.0 % |
| Z score between 1.01 and 2.0 (normal to high) | 29 (4.0) | 2.5–5.5 % |
| Z score between 2.01 and 3.0 (high) | 13 (1.8) | 0.8–2.8 % |
| Z score > 3.0 (very high) | 14 (1.9) | 1.0–2.9 % |
| BMI-for-aged | ||
| Z score < −3.0 (very thin) | 15 (2.1) | 1.1–3.2 % |
| Z score between −3.0 and −2.01 (thin) | 28 (3.9) | 2.6–5.4 % |
| Z score between −2.0 and −1.01 (thin to normal) | 98 (13.7) | 11.2–16.2 % |
| Z score between −1.0 and 1.0 (normal) | 411 (57.3) | 53.6–60.8 % |
| Z score between 1.01 and 2.0 (at risk for overweight) | 123 (17.2) | 14.5–19.9 % |
| Z score between 2.01 and 3.0 (overweight) | 28 (3.9) | 2.6–5.3 % |
| Z score >3.0 (obese) | 14 (2.0) | 1.0–3.1 % |
N Number of subjects, 95 % CI 95 % confidence interval, SD standard deviation, g grams, BMI body mass index
aN may vary according to the data available for each variable. b Prevalence in children aged between 12 and 15.9 months of age. c Children who were not old enough to be immunized were not considered part of the target population. d According to anthropometric data collected on the day of the interview
Prevalence of selected health and health care indicators according to maternal education level and socioeconomic status (N = 749)
| Predictor variable | Maternal education level | Socioeconomic status | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome (n) | 0–4 years n (%) | 0–8 years n (%) | ≥9 years n (%) | Total n (%) | PR (95 % CI) | n for outcome | Low n (%) | High n (%) | Total n (%) | PR (95 % CI) |
| Pregnancy health card ownership (n = 531) | ||||||||||
| Yes | 129 (62.0) | 167 (72.6) | 76 (81.7) | 372 (70.1) | 1.32 (1.14–1.51) | n = 532 | 171 (67.3) | 202 (72.7) | 373 (70.1) | 1.08 (1.0–1.4) |
| No | 79 (38.0) | 63 (27.4) | 17 (18.3) | 159 (29.9) | 0.001 | 83 (32.7) | 76 (27.3) | 159 (29.9) | 0.18 | |
| Child health card ownership (n = 739) | ||||||||||
| Yes | 261 (80.4) | 264 (86.0) | 112 (94.9) | 637 (86.2) | 1.18 (1.15–1.43) | n = 742 | 308 (86.0) | 331 (92.2) | 639 (86.1) | 1.07 (0.8–1.2) |
| No | 53 (19.6) | 43 (14.0) | 6 (5.1) | 102 (13.8) | 0.013 | 50 (14.0) | 53 (13.8) | 103 (13.9) | 0.95 | |
| Prenatal care before 20th week (n = 335) | ||||||||||
| Yes | 88 (70.4) | 120 (79.5) | 49 (83.1) | 257 (76.7) | 1.18 (1.01–1.49) | n = 257 | 115 (75.2) | 142 (77.6) | 257 (76.5) | 1.03 (0.8–1.4) |
| No | 37 (29.6) | 31 (20.5) | 10 (16.9) | 78 (23.3) | 0.009 | 38 (24.8) | 41 (22.4) | 79 (23.5) | 0.60 | |
| At least four prenatal visits (n = 368) | ||||||||||
| Yes | 57 (44.9) | 104 (63.0) | 61 (80.3) | 222 (60.3) | 1.79 (1.38–2.11) | n = 369 | 90 (52.9) | 133 (66.8) | 223 (60.4) | 1.26 (1.1–1.7) |
| No | 70 (55.1) | 61 (37.0) | 15 (19.7) | 146 (39.7) | <0.001 | 80 (47.1) | 66 (33.2) | 146 (39.6) | 0.007 | |
| Delivery at health facility (n = 745) | ||||||||||
| Yes | 171 (54.1) | 232 (74.8) | 116 (97.5) | 519 (69.7) | 1.80 (1.50–1.91) | n = 748 | 235 (65.1) | 285 (73.6) | 520 (69.5) | 1.13 (1.1–1.4) |
| No | 145 (45.9) | 78 (25.2) | 3 (2.5) | 226 (30.3) | <0.001 | 126 (34.9) | 102 (26.4) | 228 (30.5) | 0.011 | |
| All children currently alive (n = 744) | ||||||||||
| Yes | 169 (53.5) | 250 (80.6) | 111 (94.1) | 530 (71.2) | 1.76 (1.57–1.80) | n = 747 | 253 (70.1) | 278 (72.0) | 531 (71.1) | 1.03 (0.8–1.1) |
| No | 147 (46.5) | 60 (19.4) | 7 (5.9) | 214 (28.8) | <0.001 | 108 (29.9) | 108 (28.0) | 216 (28.9) | 0.60 | |
| ≥3 years between births (n = 569) | ||||||||||
| Yes | 126 (43.8) | 96 (42.9) | 34 (59.6) | 256 (45.0) | 1.36 (1.31–1.43) | n = 572 | 120 (43.6) | 137 (46.1) | 315 (56.4) | 1.06 (0.9–1.3) |
| No | 162 (56.3) | 128 (57.1) | 23 (40.4) | 313 (55.0) | 0.06 | 155 (56.4) | 160 (53.9) | 157 (44.9) | 0.55 | |
| BCG vaccine up to date for age (n = 557) | ||||||||||
| Up to date | 220 (97.3) | 220 (94.8) | 95 (96.0) | 535 (96.1) | 0.99 (0.52–1.44) | n = 559 | 254 (94.8) | 283 (97.3) | 537 (96.1) | 1.03 (1.0–1.9) |
| Delayed | 6 (2.7) | 12 (5.2) | 4 (4.0) | 22 (3.9) | 0.38 | 14 (5.2) | 8 (2.7) | 22 (3.9) | 0.13 | |
| Poliomyelitis 3rd dose up to date (n = 260) | ||||||||||
| Up to date for age | 70 (75.3) | 78 (73.6) | 49 (80.3) | 197 (75.8) | 1.07 (0.75–1.24) | n = 261 | 82 (73.9) | 116 (77.3) | 198 (75.9) | 1.05 (0.8–1.3) |
| Delayed | 23 (24.7) | 28 (26.4) | 12 (19.7) | 63 (24.2) | 0.61 | 29 (26.1) | 34 (22.7) | 63 (24.1) | 0.52 | |
| Pentavalent vaccine 3rd dose up to date (n = 268) | ||||||||||
| Up to date for age | 71 (71.7) | 79 (73.1) | 48 (78.7) | 198 (73.9) | 1.10 (0.80–1.25) | n = 269 | 84 (73.7) | 115 (74.2) | 199 (74.0) | 1.01 (0.7–1.2) |
| Delayed | 28 (28.3) | 29 (26.9) | 13 (21.3) | 70 (26.1) | 0.61 | 30 (26.3) | 40 (25.8) | 70 (26.0) | 0.93 | |
| Mumps vaccine up to date (n = 208) | ||||||||||
| Up to date for age | 47 (61.0) | 54 (66.7) | 40 (80.0) | 141 (67.8) | 1.31 (0.90–1.34) | n = 209 | 61 (71.8) | 80 (64.5) | 141 (67.5) | 0.90 (0.5–1.0) |
| Delayed | 30 (39.0) | 27 (33.3) | 10 (20.0) | 67 (32.2) | 0.08 | 24 (28.2) | 44 (35.5) | 68 (32.5) | 0.27 | |
PR prevalence ratio, 95 % CI 95 % confidence interval