| Literature DB >> 24369925 |
Thomas M Olino1, Stephanie D Stepp, Kate Keenan, Rolf Loeber, Alison Hipwell.
Abstract
Longitudinal mixture models have become popular in the literature. However, modest attention has been paid to whether these models provide a better fit to the data than growth models. Here, we compared longitudinal mixture models to growth models in the context of changes in depression and anxiety symptoms in a community sample of girls from age 10 to 17. Model comparisons found that the preferred solution was a 5-class parallel process growth mixture model that differed in the course of depression and anxiety symptoms reflecting both ordering of symptoms and qualitative group differences. Comparisons between classes revealed substantive differences on a number of outcomes using this solution. Findings are discussed in the context of clinical assessment and implementation of growth mixture models.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24369925 PMCID: PMC4225067 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2013.866570
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pers Assess ISSN: 0022-3891