| Literature DB >> 24369908 |
Laxmi Bhatta1, Elise Klouman, Keshab Deuba, Rachana Shrestha, Deepak Kumar Karki, Anna Mia Ekstrom, Luai Awad Ahmed.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Though financial and policy level efforts are made to expand antiretroviral treatment (ART) service free of cost, survival outcome of ART program has not been systematically evaluated in Nepal. This study assesses the mortality rates and determinants among adult HIV-infected patients on ART in Far-western region of Nepal.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24369908 PMCID: PMC3880177 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-604
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Figure 1Profile of the study cohort.
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier survival curve of 1024 adult HIV-infected patients on ART.
Mortality rates (per 100 person-years) of HIV-infected patients over different follow-up time intervals
| ( | |
|---|---|
| 21.9 (16.6 – 28.8) | |
| 18.2 (14.6 – 22.6) | |
| 11.9 (9.7 – 14.5) | |
| 8.5 (7.1 – 10.3) | |
| 6.3 (5.3 – 7.6) | |
| 6.3 (5.3 – 7.6) |
N = total number of patients.
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of 1024 patients on ART
| | | |
| Female | 500 (48.8%) | 21 (4.2%) |
| Male | 524 (51.2%) | 99 (18.9%) |
| | | |
| 15 – 32 years | 338 (33.0%) | 27 (8.0%) |
| 33 – 40 years | 401 (39.2%) | 52 (13.0%) |
| >40 years | 285 (27.8%) | 41 (14.4%) |
| | | |
| Illiterate | 650 (73.5%) | 69 (10.6%) |
| Literate | 234 (26.5%) | 35 (15.0%) |
| | ||
| | | |
| Normal | 732 (73.1%) | 45 (6.1%) |
| Bedridden <50% | 182 (18.2%) | 44 (24.2%) |
| Bedridden >50% | 87 (8.7%) | 28 (32.2%) |
| | ||
| | | |
| < 45 Kg | 484 (49.1%) | 58 (12.0%) |
| 45 – 60 Kg | 479 (48.6%) | 49 (10.2%) |
| >60 Kg | 23 (2.3%) | 2 (8.7%) |
| | ||
| | | |
| Stage I or II | 320 (34.2%) | 10 (3.1%) |
| Stage III | 455 (48.6%) | 63 (13.8%) |
| Stage IV | 161 (17.2%) | 41 (25.5%) |
| | ||
| | | |
| ≤ 50 cells/mm3 | 127 (13.6%) | 19 (15.0%) |
| 51- 200 cells/mm3 | 533 (57.1%) | 69 (13.0%) |
| >200 cells/mm3 | 274 (29.3%) | 14 (5.1%) |
| | ||
| | | |
| No | 788 (80.9%) | 83 (10.5%) |
| Yes | 186 (19.1%) | 31 (16.7%) |
| | ||
| | | |
| No | 856 (83.6%) | 89 (10.4%) |
| Yes | 168 (16.4%) | 31 (18.5%) |
| | | |
| d4T/3TC/NVP | 151 (14.8%) | 26 (17.2%) |
| d4T/3TC/EFV | 44 (4.3%) | 7 (16.0%) |
| ZDV/3TC/NVP | 702 (69.0%) | 64 (9.1%) |
| ZDV/3TC/EFV | 118 (11.6%) | 20 (17.0%) |
| TDF/3TC/EFV | 3 (0.3%) | 0 |
| | ||
| | | |
| No | 760 (74.2%) | 78 (10.3%) |
| Yes | 264 (25.8%) | 42 (16.0%) |
| | | |
| Seti Zonal hospital | 590 (57.6%) | 51 (8.6%) |
| Kanchanpur Zonal hospital | 70 (6.8%) | 13 (18.6%) |
| Achham District hospital | 176 (17.2%) | 24 (13.6%) |
| Doti district hospital | 176 (17.2%) | 32 (18.2%) |
| Tikapur hospital | 12 (1.2%) | 0 |
acolumn percentage (missing data was excluded);.
brow percentage;.
#all regimen were first line ART regimen.
Note: missing data refers to incomplete/missing recorded characteristics of patients.
Hazard ratios (HR) of mortality in 1024 patients on ART
| | | | | |
| Kailali Distric
| 1.00 | | | |
| Kanchanpur District
| 2.03 (1.10 – 3.73) | 0.023 | | |
| Doti District
| 1.93 (1.24 – 3.00) | 0.004 | | |
| Achham District
| 1.71 (1.05 – 2.78) | 0.031 | | |
| | | | | |
| Female (ref.) | 1.00 | | 1.00 | |
| Male | 5.40 (3.37 – 8.65) | <0.001 | 4.55 (2.43 – 8.51) | <0.001 |
| | | | | |
| 15- 32 years (ref.) | 1.00 | | | |
| 33- 40 years | 1.66 (1.04 – 2.64) | 0.033 | | |
| >40 years | 1.93 (1.19 – 3.14) | 0.008 | | |
| | | | | |
| Illiterate (ref.) | 1.00 | | | |
| Literate | 1.45 (0.96 – 2.17) | 0.075 | | |
| | | | | |
| Normal (ref.) | 1.00 | | 1.00 | |
| Bedridden <50% | 4.54 (2.99 – 6.88) | <0.001 | 2.05 (1.19 – 3.52) | 0.010 |
| Bedridden >50% | 5.53 (3.45 – 8.87) | <0.001 | 3.41 (1.67 – 6.98) | 0.001 |
| 1.02(1.01 – 1.05)
| 0.048 | 1.04(1.01 – 1.07)
| 0.010 | |
| | | | | |
| Stage I or II (ref.) | 1.00 | | 1.00 | |
| Stage III | 4.39 (2.25- 8.55) | <0.001 | 2.96 (1.31- 6.69) | 0.009 |
| Stage IV | 8.85 (4.43-17.66) | <0.001 | 3.28 (1.30- 8.29) | 0.012 |
| 0.99 (0.98- 0.99) | <0.001 | | | |
| | | | | |
| No (ref.) | 1.00 | | | |
| Yes | 1.45 (0.96- 2.19) | 0.078 | | |
| | | | | |
| No (ref.) | 1.00 | | | |
| Yes | 1.73 (1.15- 2.61) | 0.009 | | |
| | | | | |
| d4T/3TC/NVP (ref.) | 1.00 | | | |
| d4T/3TC/EFV | 0.90 (0.39- 2.07) | 0.803 | | |
| ZDV/3TC/NVP | 0.49 (0.31- 0.77) | 0.002 | | |
| ZDV/3TC/EFV | 0.97 (0.54- 1.73) | 0.907 | | |
| | | | | |
| No (ref.) | 1.00 | | | |
| Yes | 1.37 (0.94- 2.00) | 0.10 | ||
Kailali District (Seti Zonal Hospital and Tikapur Hospital), Kanchanpur District (Kanchanpur Zonal Hospital), Doti District (Doti District Hospital), and Achham District (Achham District Hospital). bplain/terai district, chill district . dContinuous variables. TDF/3TC/EFV regimen was not included. fCox proportional hazards model adjusted for all variables in the table. gHR for 1 kg decrease in bodyweight.
ref.: reference group.