Pinar Karaca-Mandic1, Sung J Choi-Yoo2, Jinhyung Lee3, Peter Scal4. 1. Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn. Electronic address: pkmandic@umn.edu. 2. Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn. 3. Department of Economics, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between family members' out-of-pocket (OOP) health care spending and unmet needs or delayed health care due to cost for children with and without special health care needs (SHCN). METHODS: Data come from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2002-2009, and include 63,462 observations representing 41,748 unique children. The primary outcome was having any unmet needs/delayed care as a result of the cost of medical care, dental care, or prescription drugs. We also examined having unmet needs/delayed care due to cost for each service separately. Key explanatory variables were OOP spending on the index child and OOP spending on other family members. We estimated multivariate instrumental variable models to adjust the results for potential bias from any unobserved factors that might influence both other family OOP costs and the outcome variable. RESULTS: An increase of other family OOP costs from $500 (50th percentile) to $3000 (90th percentile) was associated with a higher adjusted rate of any unmet need/delayed care due to cost (1.39% to 5.62%, P < .001, among children without SHCN; 3.17% to 7.87%, P = .01, among those with SHCN). Among children without SHCN, higher OOP costs among other family members were associated with higher levels of unmet needs or delays in medical, prescription drug, and dental care, while among children with SHCN, higher OOP costs among other family members was primarily associated with unmet or delayed dental care. CONCLUSIONS: Programs and policies that reduce the OOP costs of family members other than the child may improve the child's access to care.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between family members' out-of-pocket (OOP) health care spending and unmet needs or delayed health care due to cost for children with and without special health care needs (SHCN). METHODS: Data come from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2002-2009, and include 63,462 observations representing 41,748 unique children. The primary outcome was having any unmet needs/delayed care as a result of the cost of medical care, dental care, or prescription drugs. We also examined having unmet needs/delayed care due to cost for each service separately. Key explanatory variables were OOP spending on the index child and OOP spending on other family members. We estimated multivariate instrumental variable models to adjust the results for potential bias from any unobserved factors that might influence both other family OOP costs and the outcome variable. RESULTS: An increase of other family OOP costs from $500 (50th percentile) to $3000 (90th percentile) was associated with a higher adjusted rate of any unmet need/delayed care due to cost (1.39% to 5.62%, P < .001, among children without SHCN; 3.17% to 7.87%, P = .01, among those with SHCN). Among children without SHCN, higher OOP costs among other family members were associated with higher levels of unmet needs or delays in medical, prescription drug, and dental care, while among children with SHCN, higher OOP costs among other family members was primarily associated with unmet or delayed dental care. CONCLUSIONS: Programs and policies that reduce the OOP costs of family members other than the child may improve the child's access to care.
Authors: Alon Peltz; Chang L Wu; Marjorie Lee White; Karen M Wilson; Scott A Lorch; Cary Thurm; Matt Hall; Jay G Berry Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-04-11 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Ashley M Kranz; Sarah L Goff; Andrew W Dick; Christopher Whaley; Kimberley H Geissler Journal: J Public Health Dent Date: 2022-04-03 Impact factor: 2.258