| Literature DB >> 24369477 |
Mariana Haddad-Rodrigues1, Ana Márcia Spanó Nakano2, Juliana Stefanello2, Renata Cristina Campos Pereira Silveira2.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of acupuncture versus placebo acupuncture on anxiety in lactating mothers with preterm infants. A parallel, randomized, patient-assessor blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary school hospital in Londrina, Brazil, between 2011 and 2012. Mothers (n = 29) with very low birth weight infants born at this institution were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: acupuncture, AG (n = 14), or placebo acupuncture, PG (n = 15). Treatment sessions occurred once a week, using 5 Chinese auricular points unilaterally. The primary outcome measure was STAI-State scores, and secondary outcome measure was salivary cortisol levels. Both measures were collected before and after treatment and submitted to a blind assessor. Before-after treatment mean difference in STAI-State scores was observed in both groups (AG = 8.71 and PG = 8.20), not statistically significant (P = 0.888), although within group analysis was significant for both groups (P < 0.005). Salivary cortisol levels did not change after treatment in both groups (P = 0.480). There was no correlation between STAI and salivary cortisol results. At infant's hospital discharge, 76% subjects were breastfeeding exclusively. There was no difference between real and placebo acupuncture for anxiety in mothers with preterm infants.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24369477 PMCID: PMC3858010 DOI: 10.1155/2013/169184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Location of ear acupoints. (a) shenmen; (b) muscle relaxation; (c) tension; (d) anxiety 1 and 2.
Figure 2Needles used during intervention. (a) Real acupuncture needles; (b) placebo custom-made needles.
Figure 3Flow diagram of a randomized, patient-assessor blind, placebo-controlled trial using acupuncture for anxiety in lactating mothers with premature infants.
Sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics of subjects (n = 29).
| Variable | AG ( | PG ( | Total |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sociodemographic | |||||||
| Age, mean (SD), min–max*, years | 25,29 (6,51) | 16–36* | 28,33 (7,91) | 16–40* | 26,86 (7,30) | 16–40* | 0,269a |
| Race, | |||||||
| Caucasian | 7 | (50) | 7 | (46,7) | 14 | (48,3) | 1,000b |
| Noncaucasian | 7 | (50) | 8 | (53,3) | 15 | (51,7) | |
| Level of education, | |||||||
| Elementary and middle school | 5 | (35,7) | 2 | (13,3) | 7 | (24,1) | 0,949c |
| High school | 5 | (35,7) | 12 | (80,0) | 17 | (58,6) | |
| University degree | 4 | (28,6) | 1 | (6,7) | 5 | (17,2) | |
| Conjugal status, | |||||||
| With partner | 10 | (71,4) | 11 | (73,3) | 21 | (72,4) | 1,000b |
| Without partner | 4 | (28,6) | 4 | (26,7) | 8 | (27,6) | |
| Family income, | |||||||
| <1 | 4 | (28,6) | 2 | (14,3) | 6 | (21,4) | 0,769c |
| 1–3 | 8 | (57,1) | 11 | (67,9) | 19 | (67,9) | |
| >3 | 2 | (14,3) | 1 | (7,1) | 3 | (10,7) | |
| Employed, | |||||||
| Yes | 8 | (57,1) | 11 | (73,3) | 19 | (65,5) | 0,450b |
| No | 6 | (42,9) | 4 | (26,7) | 10 | (34,5) | |
| Alcohol use, | |||||||
| Yes | 1 | (7,1) | 2 | (13,3) | 3 | (10,3) | 1,000b |
| No | 13 | (92,9) | 13 | (89,7) | 26 | (89,7) | |
| Tobacco use, | |||||||
| Yes | 2 | (14,3) | 0 | (6,9) | 2 | (6,9) | 0,224b |
| No | 12 | (85,7) | 15 | (93,1) | 27 | (93,1) | |
| Place of residence, | |||||||
| Londrina | 8 | (57,1) | 12 | (80,0) | 20 | (69,0) | 0,245b |
| Other cities | 6 | (42,9) | 3 | (20,0) | 9 | (31,0) | |
| Obstetric | |||||||
| Parity, | |||||||
| Primiparous | 4 | (28,60) | 7 | (46,70) | 14 | (48,30) | 0,450b |
| Multiparous | 10 | (71,40) | 8 | (53,30) | 15 | (51,70) | |
| Type of birth, | |||||||
| Vaginal | 3 | (21,4) | 5 | (33,3) | 8 | (27,6) | 0,682b |
| Cesarean | 11 | (78,6) | 10 | (66,7) | 21 | (72,4) | |
| Pregnancy was planned, | |||||||
| Yes | 6 | (42,9) | 6 | (40,0) | 12 | (41,4) | 1,000b |
| No | 8 | (57,1) | 9 | (58,6) | 17 | (58,6) | |
| Prenatal appointments, mean (SD), min–max* | 7,79 (3,29) | 5–16* | 5,33 (2,47) | 2–10* | 6,52 (3,10) | 2–16* | 0,031a |
| No. of pregnancies, mean (SD), min–max* | 2,43 (2,31) | 1–9* | 1,93 (1,39) | 1–5* | 2,17 (1,87) | 1–9* | |
| No. of vaginal births, mean (SD), min–max* | 0,71 (0,99) | 0–3* | 0,73 (1,10) | 0–4* | 0,72 (1,03) | 0–4* | |
| No. of cesareans, mean (SD), min–max* | 1,00 (0,68) | 0–3* | 1,00 (0,85) | 0–3* | 1,00 (0,76) | 0–3* | |
| Abortion, | |||||||
| Yes | 4 | (26,6) | 1 | (6,7) | 5 | (17,2) | |
| No | 10 | (71,4) | 14 | (93,3) | 24 | (82,8) | |
SD: standard deviation. aStudent's t-test; bFisher's exact test; cPearson's correlation test.
Breastfeeding and neonatal characteristics.
| Variable | AG ( | PG ( | Total |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breastfeeding | |||||||
| Previous experience, | |||||||
| Yes | 4 | (28,60) | 7 | (46,70) | 14 | (48,30) | 0,450* |
| No | 10 | (71,40) | 8 | (53,30) | 15 | (51,70) | |
| Breastfeeding problems, | |||||||
| Yes | 1 | (7,10) | 3 | (20,00) | 4 | (13,80) | 0,598* |
| No | 13 | (92,90) | 12 | (80,00) | 25 | (86,20) | |
| Galactogogue (protocol completed), | |||||||
| Yes | 6 | (42,90) | 6 | (40,00) | 14 | (48,30) | 1,000* |
| No | 8 | (57,10) | 9 | (60,00) | 15 | (51,70) | |
| Exclusively breastfeeding at infant's hospital discharge | |||||||
| Yes | 9 | (64,30) | 13 | (86,70) | 22 | (75,90) | 0,215* |
| No | 5 | 35,70) | 2 | (13,30) | 7 | (24,10) | |
| Neonatal | |||||||
| Gender, | |||||||
| Female | 9 | (64,3) | 8 | (53,3) | 17 | (58,6) | |
| Male | 5 | (35,7) | 7 | (46,7) | 12 | (41,4) | |
| Size to gestational age, | |||||||
| Adequate | 9 | (64,3) | 12 | (80,0) | 21 | (72,4) | |
| Small | 5 | (35,7) | 3 | (20,0) | 8 | (27,6) | |
| Birth weight, mean (SD), min–max*, grams | 1046,79 (248,88) | 535–1335* | 1081,67 (229,98) | 620–1440* | 1064,83 (253,62) | 535–1440* | |
| Gestational age, mean (SD), median* (min–max), weeks | 29,06 (2,42) | 24,86–34,00* | 28,86 (2,76) | 24,29–34,43* | 28,96 (2,56) | 24,29–34,43* | |
| 1-minute Apgar score, mean (SD), min–max* | 5,21 (2,19) | 1–8* | 5,07 (2,60) | 1–9* | 5,15 (2,37) | 1–9* | |
| 5-minute Apgar score mean (SD), min–max* | 7,64 (1,39) | 4–9* | 8,07 (0,96) | 7–10* | 7,86 (1,19) | 4–10* | |
| Hospitalization period, mean (SD), min–max*, days | 64,43 (24,01) | 34–119* | 62,27 (35,28) | 29–174* | 63,31 (29,85) | 29–174* | |
SD: standard deviation.
*Student's t-test.
STAI scores before and after the intervention.
| STAI scores | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Standard deviation |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STAI-Trait (preintervention) | |||||
| AG ( | 29,00 | 69,00 | 44,57 | 11,64 | 0,937a |
| PG ( | 29,00 | 61,00 | 44,27 | 8,71 | |
| Total ( | 29,00 | 69,00 | 44,41 | 10,05 | |
| STAI-State (postintervention) | |||||
| AG | 28,00 | 66,00 | 46,43 | 11,10 | 0,350a |
| PG | 32,00 | 63,00 | 50,07 | 9,48 | |
| Total | 28,00 | 66,00 | 48,31 | 10,28 | |
| STAI-State (postintervention) | |||||
| AG | 28,00 | 50,00 | 37,71 | 5,33 | |
| PG | 31,00 | 56,00 | 41,87 | 8,85 | |
| Total | 28,00 | 56,00 | 39,86 | 7,53 | |
| Difference (pre- and postintervention)* | |||||
| AG | −4,00 | 30,00 | 8,71 | 9,79 | 0,888a |
| PG | −6,00 | 24,00 | 8,20 | 9,68 | |
| Total | −6,00 | 30,00 | 8,45 | 9,56 |
*STAI-State preintervention minus STAI-State postintervention. aStudent's t-test
Salivary cortisol levels before and after intervention (ug/dL).
| Variables | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Standard deviation |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preintervention measures1 | |||||
| AG ( | 0,04 | 0,33 | 0,13 | 0,08 | |
| PG ( | 0,02 | 0,31 | 0,13 | 0,08 | |
| Total ( | 0,02 | 0,33 | 0,13 | 0,08 | |
| Postintervention measures2 | |||||
| AG | 0,02 | 0,49 | 0,14 | 0,15 | |
| PG | 0,02 | 0,35 | 0,14 | 0,09 | |
| Total | 0,02 | 0,49 | 0,14 | 0,12 | |
| Difference (pre- minus postintervention)3 | |||||
| GA | −0,35 | 0,13 | -0,03 | 0,14 | 0,480** |
| GP | −0,20 | 0,14 | 0,00* | 0,09 | |
| Total | −0,35 | 0,14 | -0,02 | 0,11 |
1Mean value of day 0 and day 1 measurements after subject's hospital discharge.
2Mean value of day 0 and day 1 measurements of infant's successful breastfeeding initiation.
3Preintervention measurements minus postintervention measurements.
*−0.004
**Student's t-test.
Correlation between STAI scores and salivary cortisol levels (P value).
| Variables | Preintervention cortisol | Postintervention cortisol | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AG | PG | Total | AG | PG | Total | |
| STAI-Trait | 0,402 | 0,252 | 0,154 | 0,239 | 0,041 | 0,800 |
| STAI-State (pre-intervention) | 0,749 | 0,942 | 0,753 | — | — | — |
| STAI-State (post-intervention) | — | — | — | 0,676 | 0,007* | 0,388 |
*Pearson's correlation (P < 0.05).