Janet R Cummings1, Hefei Wen1, Michelle Ko2, Benjamin G Druss1. 1. Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 2. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Although substance use disorders (SUDs) are prevalent and associated with adverse consequences, treatment rates remain low. Unlike physical and mental health problems, treatment for SUDs is predominantly provided in a separate specialty sector and more heavily financed by public sources. Medicaid expansion under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act has the potential to increase access to treatment for SUDs but only if an infrastructure exists to serve new enrollees. OBJECTIVE: To examine the availability of outpatient SUD treatment facilities that accept Medicaid across US counties and whether counties with a higher percentage of racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to have gaps in this infrastructure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We used data from the 2009 National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services public use file and the 2011-2012 Area Resource file to examine sociodemographic factors associated with county-level access to SUD treatment facilities that serve Medicaid enrollees. Counties in all 50 states were included. We estimated a probit model with state indicators to adjust for state-level heterogeneity in demographics, politics, and policies. Independent variables assessed county racial/ethnic composition (ie, percentage black and percentage Hispanic), percentage living in poverty, percentage living in a rural area, percentage insured with Medicaid, percentage uninsured, and total population. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Dichotomous indicator for counties with at least 1 outpatient SUD treatment facility that accepts Medicaid. RESULTS: Approximately 60% of US counties have at least 1 outpatient SUD facility that accepts Medicaid, although this rate is lower in many Southern and Midwestern states than in other areas of the country. Counties with a higher percentage of black (marginal effect [ME], -3.1; 95% CI, -5.2% to -0.9%), rural (-9.2%; -11.1% to -7.4%), and/or uninsured (-9.5%; -13.0% to -5.9%) residents are less likely to have one of these facilities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The potential for increasing access to SUD treatment via Medicaid expansion may be tempered by the local availability of facilities to provide care, particularly for counties with a high percentage of black and/or uninsured residents and for rural counties. Although states that opt in to the expansion will secure additional federal funds for the SUD treatment system, additional policies may need to be implemented to ensure that adequate geographic access exists across local communities to serve new enrollees.
IMPORTANCE: Although substance use disorders (SUDs) are prevalent and associated with adverse consequences, treatment rates remain low. Unlike physical and mental health problems, treatment for SUDs is predominantly provided in a separate specialty sector and more heavily financed by public sources. Medicaid expansion under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act has the potential to increase access to treatment for SUDs but only if an infrastructure exists to serve new enrollees. OBJECTIVE: To examine the availability of outpatient SUD treatment facilities that accept Medicaid across US counties and whether counties with a higher percentage of racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to have gaps in this infrastructure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We used data from the 2009 National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services public use file and the 2011-2012 Area Resource file to examine sociodemographic factors associated with county-level access to SUD treatment facilities that serve Medicaid enrollees. Counties in all 50 states were included. We estimated a probit model with state indicators to adjust for state-level heterogeneity in demographics, politics, and policies. Independent variables assessed county racial/ethnic composition (ie, percentage black and percentage Hispanic), percentage living in poverty, percentage living in a rural area, percentage insured with Medicaid, percentage uninsured, and total population. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Dichotomous indicator for counties with at least 1 outpatient SUD treatment facility that accepts Medicaid. RESULTS: Approximately 60% of US counties have at least 1 outpatient SUD facility that accepts Medicaid, although this rate is lower in many Southern and Midwestern states than in other areas of the country. Counties with a higher percentage of black (marginal effect [ME], -3.1; 95% CI, -5.2% to -0.9%), rural (-9.2%; -11.1% to -7.4%), and/or uninsured (-9.5%; -13.0% to -5.9%) residents are less likely to have one of these facilities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The potential for increasing access to SUD treatment via Medicaid expansion may be tempered by the local availability of facilities to provide care, particularly for counties with a high percentage of black and/or uninsured residents and for rural counties. Although states that opt in to the expansion will secure additional federal funds for the SUD treatment system, additional policies may need to be implemented to ensure that adequate geographic access exists across local communities to serve new enrollees.
Authors: Lynn M Wielen; Emma C Gilchrist; Molly A Nowels; Stephen M Petterson; George Rust; Benjamin F Miller Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2015-08
Authors: Elizabeth E Krans; Joo Yeon Kim; Alton Everette James; David Kelley; Marian P Jarlenski Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Scott E Hadland; J Frank Wharam; Mark A Schuster; Fang Zhang; Jeffrey H Samet; Marc R Larochelle Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Andrea Acevedo; Lee Panas; Deborah Garnick; Dolores Acevedo-Garcia; Jennifer Miles; Grant Ritter; Kevin Campbell Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 1.505