Literature DB >> 2436827

Frequency- and orientation-dependent effects of mexiletine and quinidine on conduction in the intact dog heart.

A K Bajaj, H A Kopelman, J P Wikswo, F Cassidy, R L Woosley, D M Roden.   

Abstract

Myocardial conduction depends on the magnitude of the fast inward sodium current as well as on cardiac fiber orientation, with more rapid propagation along myocardial fibers than across them. Although antiarrhythmic drugs depress the sodium current in a frequency-dependent fashion in vitro, their effects on conduction in the intact ventricle have been less well studied. We therefore evaluated the frequency- and orientation-dependent actions of mexiletine, quinidine, and their combination on epicardial conduction in 24 pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs. These interventions were chosen because the time constant of recovery from sodium-channel blockade by mexiletine in vitro is shorter than that from blockade by quinidine, and because we have previously shown that the combination of these drugs is often clinically effective when single-agent therapy fails. An electrode array that permitted measurement of conduction times in multiple orientations over short segments of epicardium without contamination by rapid Purkinje fiber propagation or by latency or virtual cathode effects at the stimulus site was developed for these studies. In all animals, the atrioventricular node was destroyed by injection of formalin to permit measurements over a wide range of cycle lengths (250 to 1500 msec). In the absence of drugs, conduction in any direction was frequency independent. In the presence of mexiletine, however, frequency-dependent increases in conduction times were found at cycle lengths of 600 msec or less; these changes were significantly greater in orientations for which baseline conduction was rapid. Quinidine, on the other hand, increased conduction times at all tested cycle lengths without significant orientation-dependent effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2436827     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.75.5.1065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  4 in total

Review 1.  Drug effects on the electrocardiogram. A review of their clinical importance.

Authors:  J D Symanski; L S Gettes
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Myocardial electrical propagation in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  K P Anderson; R Walker; P Urie; P R Ershler; R L Lux; S V Karwandee
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Direct quantification of apparent binding indices from quinidine-induced in vivo conduction delay in canine myocardium.

Authors:  F N Haugland; S B Johnson; D L Packer
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Comparison of the electrophysiological effects of Org 7797, disopyramide, mexiletine and propafenone in anaesthetized dogs with myocardial infarcts.

Authors:  J K Campbell; R J Marshall; E Winslow
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 8.739

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.