Literature DB >> 24368144

Relationships of 35 lower limb muscles to height and body mass quantified using MRI.

Geoffrey G Handsfield1, Craig H Meyer2, Joseph M Hart3, Mark F Abel4, Silvia S Blemker5.   

Abstract

Skeletal muscle is the most abundant tissue in the body and serves various physiological functions including the generation of movement and support. Whole body motor function requires adequate quantity, geometry, and distribution of muscle. This raises the question: how do muscles scale with subject size in order to achieve similar function across humans? While much of the current knowledge of human muscle architecture is based on cadaver dissection, modern medical imaging avoids limitations of old age, poor health, and limited subject pool, allowing for muscle architecture data to be obtained in vivo from healthy subjects ranging in size. The purpose of this study was to use novel fast-acquisition MRI to quantify volumes and lengths of 35 major lower limb muscles in 24 young, healthy subjects and to determine if muscle size correlates with bone geometry and subject parameters of mass and height. It was found that total lower limb muscle volume scales with mass (R(2)=0.85) and with the height-mass product (R(2)=0.92). Furthermore, individual muscle volumes scale with total muscle volume (median R(2)=0.66), with the height-mass product (median R(2)=0.61), and with mass (median R(2)=0.52). Muscle volume scales with bone volume (R(2)=0.75), and muscle length relative to bone length is conserved (median s.d.=2.1% of limb length). These relationships allow for an arbitrary subject's individual muscle volumes to be estimated from mass or mass and height while muscle lengths may be estimated from limb length. The dataset presented here can further be used as a normative standard to compare populations with musculoskeletal pathologies.
© 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allometry; Length; Muscle; Musculoskeletal; Volume

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24368144     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  63 in total

1.  Prediction of In Vivo Knee Joint Loads Using a Global Probabilistic Analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro Navacchia; Casey A Myers; Paul J Rullkoetter; Kevin B Shelburne
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Full-Body Musculoskeletal Model for Muscle-Driven Simulation of Human Gait.

Authors:  Apoorva Rajagopal; Christopher L Dembia; Matthew S DeMers; Denny D Delp; Jennifer L Hicks; Scott L Delp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Improving Musculoskeletal Model Scaling Using an Anatomical Atlas: The Importance of Gender and Anthropometric Similarity to Quantify Joint Reaction Forces.

Authors:  Ziyun Ding; Chui K Tsang; Daniel Nolte; Angela E Kedgley; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hicks; Thomas K Uchida; Ajay Seth; Apoorva Rajagopal; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  A computational approach to calculate personalized pennation angle based on MRI: effect on motion analysis.

Authors:  Andra Chincisan; Karelia Tecante; Matthias Becker; Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann; Christof Hurschler; Hon Fai Choi
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Pelvic and lower extremity physiological cross-sectional areas: an MRI study of the living young and comparison to published research literature.

Authors:  Juliane Lube; Natasha A M S Flack; Sebastian Cotofana; Orkun Özkurtul; Stephanie J Woodley; Stefan Zachow; Niels Hammer
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Comparison of human gastrocnemius forces predicted by Hill-type muscle models and estimated from ultrasound images.

Authors:  Taylor J M Dick; Andrew A Biewener; James M Wakeling
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Challenging balance during sensorimotor adaptation increases generalization.

Authors:  Amanda Bakkum; J Maxwell Donelan; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Why are Antagonist Muscles Co-activated in My Simulation? A Musculoskeletal Model for Analysing Human Locomotor Tasks.

Authors:  Adrian K M Lai; Allison S Arnold; James M Wakeling
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Reference data on muscle volumes of healthy human pelvis and lower extremity muscles: an in vivo magnetic resonance imaging feasibility study.

Authors:  Juliane Lube; Sebastian Cotofana; Ingo Bechmann; Thomas L Milani; Orkun Özkurtul; Tatsuo Sakai; Hanno Steinke; Niels Hammer
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 1.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.