Literature DB >> 24368052

The next generation of macroergonomics: integrating safety climate.

Lauren A Murphy1, Michelle M Robertson2, Pascale Carayon3.   

Abstract

To date little research has examined safety climate in relation to macroergonomics and how the two distinct sub-disciplines can be integrated to affect safety outcomes. The purpose of macroergonomics is to design a fully "harmonized" work system that improves numerous aspects of organizational performance and effectiveness, and this is accomplished by incorporating the foundational theoretical framework of sociotechnical systems theory (STS). Two broad subsystems within such a system are the personnel subsystem, the ways individuals perform tasks, and the technological subsystem, the tasks to be performed. Management is an important aspect of the personnel subsystem, and there is a growing body of research regarding supervisors' influence over employee safety. One such area of research is safety climate, which is based on the perception of workers regarding safety and organizational practices. Two major factors of safety climate are management commitment to safety and communication pertaining to safety as a true priority from both top management and direct supervisors. This article describes the conceptual overlaps of macroergonomics and safety climate in order to present a conceptual model that integrates these domains using the framework of mesoergonomics. In conclusion, we discuss how this model can serve as a framework to guide the analysis and design of work systems and subsequent organizational interventions.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Macroergonomics; Mesoergonomics; Safety climate; Sociotechnical systems theory

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24368052     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  6 in total

1.  A pilot study of changes in Total Worker Health® policies and programs and associated changes in safety and health climates in small business.

Authors:  Erin Shore; Liliana Tenney; Natalie V Schwatka; Miranda Dally; Lynn Dexter; Carol E Brown; Lee S Newman
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.079

2.  Integrating worksite health protection and health promotion: A conceptual model for intervention and research.

Authors:  Glorian Sorensen; Deborah L McLellan; Erika L Sabbath; Jack T Dennerlein; Eve M Nagler; David A Hurtado; Nicolaas P Pronk; Gregory R Wagner
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Sociotechnical attributes of safe and unsafe work systems.

Authors:  Brian M Kleiner; Lawrence J Hettinger; David M DeJoy; Yuang-Hsiang Huang; Peter E D Love
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  Advancing a sociotechnical systems approach to workplace safety--developing the conceptual framework.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon; Peter Hancock; Nancy Leveson; Ian Noy; Laerte Sznelwar; Geert van Hootegem
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Sociotechnical approaches to workplace safety: Research needs and opportunities.

Authors:  Michelle M Robertson; Lawrence J Hettinger; Patrick E Waterson; Y Ian Noy; Marvin J Dainoff; Nancy G Leveson; Pascale Carayon; Theodore K Courtney
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  An Integrative Total Worker Health Framework for Keeping Workers Safe and Healthy During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Jack T Dennerlein; Lisa Burke; Erika L Sabbath; Jessica A R Williams; Susan E Peters; Lorraine Wallace; Melissa Karapanos; Glorian Sorensen
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.888

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.