| Literature DB >> 24367655 |
Feng Liu1, Steven R Archer2, Frances Gelwick3, Edith Bai4, Thomas W Boutton5, Xinyuan Ben Wu5.
Abstract
Woody plant encroachment into grasslands has been globally widespread. The woody species invading grasslands represent a variety of contrasting plant functional groups and growth forms. Are some woody plant functional types (PFTs) better suited to invade grasslands than others? To what extent do local patterns of distribution and abundance of woody PFTs invading grasslands reflect intrinsic topoedaphic properties versus plant-induced changes in soil properties? We addressed these questions in the Southern Great Plains, United States at a subtropical grassland known to have been encroached upon by woody species over the past 50-100 years. A total of 20 woody species (9 tree-statured; 11 shrub-statured) were encountered along a transect extending from an upland into a playa basin. About half of the encroaching woody plants were potential N2-fixers (55% of species), but they contributed only 7% to 16 % of the total basal area. Most species and the PFTs they represent were ubiquitously distributed along the topoedaphic gradient, but with varying abundances. Overstory-understory comparisons suggest that while future species composition of these woody communities is likely to change, PFT composition is not. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) ordination and variance partitioning (Partial CCA) indicated that woody species and PFT composition in developing woody communities was primarily influenced by intrinsic landscape location variables (e.g., soil texture) and secondarily by plant-induced changes in soil organic carbon and total nitrogen content. The ubiquitous distribution of species and PFTs suggests that woody plants are generally well-suited to a broad range of grassland topoedaphic settings. However, here we only examined categorical and non-quantitative functional traits. Although intrinsic soil properties exerted more control over the floristics of grassland-to-woodland succession did plant modifications of soil carbon and nitrogen concentrations, the latter are likely to influence productivity and nutrient cycling and may, over longer time-frames, feed back to influence PFT distributions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24367655 PMCID: PMC3867480 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084364
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Aerial view of the study site showing a transect spanning shrub cluster and grove communities in savanna parkland uplands, a woodland community in an intermittent drainage, and a playa savanna community.
Each of these communities is developing on former grassland. White dots are GPS locations at 5 m intervals. Dark and light gray colors indicate woody and herbaceous vegetation, respectively. Trees and shrubs were inventoried in contiguous plots (6 x 6 m and 2 x 2 m, respectively) along the transect.
Figure 2Topoedaphic variations based on sampling at 1-m intervals along a transect extending from plant communities in a savanna parkland upland (grassland, shrub cluster, grove), through intermittent drainage woodlands and into a playa savanna community.
VWC = soil volumetric water content; SOC = soil organic carbon.
Mean (+ standard error) values of soil (0-15 cm depth) variables and ANOVA results along a catena gradient in a subtropical grassland undergoing woody plant encroachment.
| Upland Grassland | Upland Cluster | Upland Grove | Drainage Woodland | Playa | ANOVAp | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bulk density (g cm-3) | 1.4±0.01 | 1.3±0.02ab | 1.2±0.02 | 1.2±0.01 | 1.8±0.03 | <0.001 |
| VWC (%) | 5.1±0.1 | 4.6±0.4 | 4.2±0.1 | 7.4±0.2 | 16.4±0.5 | <0.001 |
| PH | 7.1±0.1 | 7.1±0.2 | 7.2±0.1 | 7.2±0.1 | 6.0±0.1 | <0.001 |
| Organic carbon (g m-2) | 1233±22 | 1482±69ab | 1925±87 | 3035±99 | 3142±155 | <0.001 |
| Total nitrogen (g m-2) | 123±2 | 143±5ab | 182±8 | 288±10 | 253±14 | <0.001 |
| Sand (%) | 79±0.1 | 78±0.4 | 78±0.4 | 70±0.7 | 48±0.8 | <0.001 |
| Silt (%) | 9±0.2 | 10±0.3 | 9±0.2 | 13±0.2 | 20±0.3 | <0.001 |
| Clay (%) | 12±0.1 | 12±0.2 | 13±0.2 | 17±0.5 | 32±0.6 | <0.001 |
Different superscripts indicate significant difference among communities. Number of samples: grassland=66, cluster=18, grove=59, woodland=125, and playa=41.
Occurrence of tree-stature species (> 5 cm basal diameter) within 6 × 6m contiguous plots along a transect spanning shrub cluster and grove communities in savanna parkland uplands, woodlands of intermittent drainages, and a playa (Figure 1).
| Species | Cluster | Grove | Woodland | Playa | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | BA | N | BA | N | BA | N | BA | |
|
| 2 | 0.6±0.1 | 2 | 0.2±1.4 | 8 | 1.6±3.9 | 19 | 17.0±3.3 |
|
| 0 | - | 0 | - | 2 | 0.5±4.6 | 0 | - |
|
| 0 | - | 5 | 0.7±0.7 | 37 | 3.8±1.0 | 22 | 6.6±1.1 |
|
| 6 | 2.5±1.3 | 5 | 0.7±2.0 | 39 | 2.4±0.6 | 0 | - |
|
| 0 | - | 3 | 0.3±1.1 | 50 | 2.1±0.3 | 5 | 0.5±0.2 |
|
| 2 | 0.6±1.8 | 4 | 0.3±0.3 | 1 | 0.1 | 0 | - |
|
| 0 | - | 0 | - | 0 | - | 1 | 0.46 |
|
| 0 | - | 22 | 9.6±1.5 | 34 | 13.2±1.9 | 4 | 12.4±9.8 |
|
| 2 | 4.2±11.7 | 21 | 4.2±1.4 | 37 | 2.7±0.8 | 8 | 1.3±1.5 |
N = number of plants; BA = basal area (cm2 m-2; mean ± standard error). Prosopis glandulosa var. glanduloas was present in shrub clusters, but had died and hence was not recorded. See Table 3 for growth form and functional group categories represented by the species.
Occurrence (N) and mean basal area (BA, mean + SE; cm2 m-2 ) of shrub-stature species within a 2-m wide belt transect (Figure 1).
| Species |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaves | N-fix | Roots | N | BA(cm2) | N | BA(cm2) | N | BA(cm2) | N | BA(cm2) | |
|
|
|
|
| 0 | - | 0 | - | 2 | 30.8±1.4 | 1 | 22.1 |
|
|
|
|
| 5 | 30.7±0.3 | 0 | - | 0 | - | 0 | - |
|
|
|
|
| 0 | - | 0 | - | 13 | 111.4±0.5 | 0 | - |
|
|
|
| 0 | - | 0 | - | 257 | 173.5±0.0 | 0 | - | |
|
|
|
| 19 | 31.3±0.2 | 10 | 10.9±0.2 | 20 | 17.5±0.1 | 0 | - | |
|
|
|
| 0 | - | 0 | - | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | - | |
|
|
|
|
| 6 | 1.8±0.1 | 109 | 530.1±0.1 | 562 | 1732.8±0.0 | 5 | 96.6±0.7 |
|
|
|
|
| 289 | 106.7±0.0 | 313 | 151.9±0.0 | 30 | 22.2±0.1 | 0 | - |
|
|
|
|
| 15 | 73.4±0.5 | 18 | 9.7±0.0 | 12 | 187.4±0.7 | 0 | - |
|
|
|
| 0 | - | 12 | 28.0±0.3 | 136 | 854.6±0.1 | 7 | 115.5±1 | |
|
|
|
| 0 | - | 0 | - | 1 | 2.8 | 0 | - | |
|
|
|
|
| 22 | 50.4±0.2 | 0 | - | 0 | - | 0 | - |
|
|
|
| 2 | 3.5±0.3 | 1 | 2.8 | 4 | 9.1±0.2 | 0 | - | |
|
|
|
| 0 | - | 10 | 4.3±0.1 | 1 | 2.3 | 0 | - | |
|
|
|
|
| 0 | - | 113 | 363.1±0.1 | 184 | 190.4±0 | 0 | - |
|
|
|
|
| 0 | - | 0 | - | 0 | - | 2 | 13.2±0.1 |
|
|
|
|
| 1 | 12.6 | 9 | 178.9±0.7 | 10 | 123.4±0.7 | 0 | - |
|
|
|
| 20 | 31.2±0.1 | 84 | 58.8±0 | 160 | 101.5±0 | 0 | - | |
|
|
|
| 85 | 190.1±0.1 | 169 | 574.3±0.1 | 140 | 490.6±0.1 | 3 | 10.2±0.7 | |
|
|
|
|
| 0 | - | 3 | 14.4±0.6 | 4 | 11.3±0.4 | 5 | 19.6±0.4 |
Functional attribute codes represent leaf habit, leaf texture, rooting depth and N2-fixation potential respectively. Codes are as follows: Leaf habit [E = evergreen, FE = facultative evergreen (leaves maintained during mild winters), D= deciduous, SD=summer deciduous, PS =photosynthetic stem]. Leaf texture [S = sclerophyllous (thick and stiff),C= coriaceous (thick and leathery), M = malacophyllous (thin and pliable)] (based on authors’ field observations or, where noted, Nelson et al. 2002)]. N-fixation [* = potentially N2-fixing (based on family affinities; e.g. Fabaceae, Rhamnaceae). and , = species for which N2-fixation potential has been assessed (Zitzer et al. 1996) and for which nodulation was found to occur (#) or not occur (##)]. Root depth [int = intermediate, Deep=deep, Shallow=shallow]. §,¶ ,$ = species for which information on leaf attributes (longevity, specific leaf area, N content, etc.; § = from Nelson et al. 2002) and relative rooting depth (¶ = from Watts1993; $ = from Boutton et al. 1999) are known.
Woody species functional groups and their relative basal area along the transect.
| A. Woody Species Richness | B. Woody species relative basal area (%) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Traits | Cluster (n=12) | Grove (n=13) | Woodland (n=17) | Playa (n=7) | Total (n=20) | Cluster (540) | Grove (1943) | Woodland (4,089) | Playa (315) | Total (6,987) | |
|
| |||||||||||
| Deciduous | 6 | 6 | 9 | 5 | 13 | 38 | 46 | 55 | 60 | 51 | |
| Evergreen | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 48 | 52 | 20 | 4 | 31 | |
| Facultative Evergreen | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 2 | 26 | 37 | 19 | |
|
| |||||||||||
| Malacohyllous | 4 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 24 | 1 | 10 | 23 | 10 | |
| Coriaceous | 6 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 64 | 95 | 87 | 77 | 87 | |
| Sclerophyllous | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 4 | |
| Photosynthetic stem | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| |||||||||||
| N-Fixers | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 10 | 7 | 16 | 9 | |
| non N-fixers | 8 | 11 | 14 | 5 | 16 | 88 | 90 | 93 | 84 | 91 | |
|
| |||||||||||
| Shallow | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 42 | 30 | 17 | 8 | 22 | |
| Intermediate | 4 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 26 | 33 | 74 | 76 | 58 | |
| Deep | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 22 | 18 | 5 | 16 | 10 | |
| Unknown | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 19 | 5 | 0 | 9 | |
(A) Number of woody species representing various functional groups in four tree-shrub communities developing along a catena gradient in a former grassland; and (B) their relative contribution (%) to total basal area in the community (values under column headings are total basal area (cm2 m-2) in the community. See Tables 3 for species and their functional trait attributes.
a Ephedra antisyphilitica (stem photosynthesis; woodland only) not included in count.
Summer deciduous species (one only; Zizyphus obtusifolia) included with ‘deciduous’
Parkinsonia aculeata has photosynthetic stems and malacophyllous leaves, so is counted in each category
Parkinsonia aculeata is not counted as a N-fixer
Figure 3CCA Ordination (canonical correspondence analysis) results ordered in multivariate space along the first two canonical axes, separately depicting relationships among (A) tree-stature species (Table 1) and soil variables; and (B) communities in each 6 m × 6 m sample plot (symbols indicate community type) along a hill-slope transect.
Species centroids (+) indicate center of distribution among sample plots for each tree species coded as follows: acf = Acacia farnesiana; acr = Acacia rigidula; cel = Celtis pallida; con = Condalia hookeri; dio = Diospyros texana; kar = Karwinskia humboltiana; pro = Prosopis glandulosa; zan = Zanthoxylum fagara. Lines are vectors indicating direction of increasing value (from center outward) for soil variables as follows: BD = bulk density; Sand and clay = soil particle percentages; SOC = soil organic carbon; TN = total nitrogen.
Figure 4CCA Ordination (canonical correspondence analysis) results ordered in multivariate space along the first two canonical axes, separately depicting relationships among (A) shrub-stature species and soil variables (Table 1); and (B) 2 m × 2 m sample plots (symbols indicate community type) along a hill-slope transect.
Species centroids (+) indicate center of distribution among sample plots for each shrub species coded as follows: acf = Acacia farnesiana; acg = A. greggeii; acr = A. rigidula; alo = Aloysia gratissima; bem = Bernardia myricaefolia; ber = Bernardia myricaefolia; cel = Celtis pallida; col = Colubrina texensis; con = Condalia hookeri; dio = Diospyros texana; eph = Ephedra antisyphilitica; eys = Eysenhardtia texana; for = Forestiera angustifolia; gym = Gymnosperma spp.; kar = Karwinskia humboltiana; par = Parkinsonia aculeata; pro = Prosopis glandulosa; sch = Schaefferia cuneifolia; zan = Zanthoxylum fagara; ziz = Ziziphus obtusifolia. Lines are vectors indicating direction of increasing value (from center outward) for soil variables coded as follows: BD = bulk density; Sand and clay = soil particle percentages; SOC = soil organic carbon; TN = total nitrogen.
Figure 5Variation decomposition shown as a percentage of total variation explained (TVE) for separate analyses of tree (Figure 3) and shrub (Figure 4) plots, that were uniquely related to variable groupings that included (a) soil organic carbon and total nitrogen, (b) % sand and % clay; or (c) an equal sharing by a and b.