Literature DB >> 24366443

Anorexia nervosa: the diagnosis. A postmodern ethics contribution to the bioethics debate on involuntary treatment for anorexia nervosa.

Sacha Kendall1.   

Abstract

This paper argues that there is a relationship between understandings of anorexia nervosa (AN) and how the ethical issues associated with involuntary treatment for AN are identified, framed, and addressed. By positioning AN as a construct/discourse (hereinafter "AN: the diagnosis") several ethical issues are revealed. Firstly, "AN: the diagnosis" influences how the autonomy and competence of persons diagnosed with AN are understood by decision-makers in the treatment environment. Secondly, "AN: the diagnosis" impacts on how treatment and treatment efficacy are defined and the ethical justifiability of paternalism. Thirdly, "AN: the diagnosis" can limit the opportunity for persons with AN to construct an identity that casts them as a competent person. "AN: the diagnosis" can thus inherently affirm professional knowledge and values. Postmodern professional ethics can support professionals in managing these issues by highlighting the importance of taking responsibility for professional knowledge, values, and power and embracing moral uncertainty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24366443     DOI: 10.1007/s11673-013-9496-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioeth Inq        ISSN: 1176-7529            Impact factor:   1.352


  23 in total

1.  Anorexia nervosa and personal identity: The accounts of patients and their parents.

Authors:  Jacinta O A Tan; Tony Hope; Anne Stewart
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

2.  Competence to refuse treatment in anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Jacinta Tan; Tony Hope; Anne Stewart
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

3.  Conceptual issues in theorising anorexia nervosa: mere matters of semantics?

Authors:  Pierre Beumont; Terry Carney
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

4.  Control and compulsory treatment in anorexia nervosa: the views of patients and parents.

Authors:  Jacinta O A Tan; Tony Hope; Anne Stewart; Raymond Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

Review 5.  Coercion in the treatment of anorexia nervosa: clinical, ethical and legal implications.

Authors:  T Carney; D Tait; A Wakefield; M Ingvarson; S Touyz
Journal:  Med Law       Date:  2005-03

6.  Treating anorexics without consent: some reservations.

Authors:  H Draper
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Involuntary treatment of eating disorders.

Authors:  T L Watson; W A Bowers; A E Andersen
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  Anorexia nervosa and refusal of naso-gastric treatment: a response to Heather Draper.

Authors:  Simona Giordano
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.898

9.  Attitudes of patients with anorexia nervosa to compulsory treatment and coercion.

Authors:  Jacinta O A Tan; Anne Stewart; Raymond Fitzpatrick; Tony Hope
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2009-11-18

10.  Competence to make treatment decisions in anorexia nervosa: thinking processes and values.

Authors:  Dr Jacinta O A Tan; Professor Tony Hope; Dr Anne Stewart; Professor Raymond Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Philos Psychiatr Psychol       Date:  2006-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Two deaths and a birth: reminiscing and rehashing principles in biomedical ethics.

Authors:  Michael A Ashby; Leigh E Rich
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Treatment refusal in anorexia nervosa: the hardest of cases. Commentary on "Anorexia nervosa: the diagnosis: a postmodern ethics contribution to the bioethics debate on involuntary treatment for anorexia nervosa" by Sacha Kendall.

Authors:  Christopher James Ryan; Sascha Callaghan
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  The incredible complexity of being? Degrees of influence, coercion, and control of the "autonomy" of severe and enduring anorexia nervosa patients. Commentary on "Anorexia nervosa: the diagnosis: a postmodern ethics contribution to the bioethics debate on involuntary treatment for anorexia nervosa" by Sacha Kendall.

Authors:  Terry Carney
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 1.352

4.  The Ethics of Deep Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa.

Authors:  Hannah Maslen; Jonathan Pugh; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Neuroethics       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 1.480

5.  Perspectives on Involuntary Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa.

Authors:  Loa Clausen
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.157

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.