Hemorrhagic diarrhea in poultry is caused by Eimeria tenella, the most pathogenic avian coccidian parasite, and new approaches to treat the disease are continually being sought. Although eimeripain, a cathepsin B-like cysteine protease from E. tenella, has recently been identified as a novel anticoccidial drug target, its localization during the intracellular development of parasites remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate the expression of eimeripain during asexual and sexual development of E. tenella in vivo. Promature eimeripain was detected only in the early immature second generation of schizonts. In contrast, the mature eimeripain was most strongly detected in the middle-sized immature second generation of schizonts. Both promature and mature eimeripain disappeared depending on the maturation level of second generation of schizonts, but were strongly expressed again in the third generation of schizonts. In the sexual stage, both promature and mature eimeripain were detected in the cytoplasm of micro- and macro-gametocytes and zygotes, but expression became weak in zoites forming oocysts. Collectively, our findings suggest that eimeripain might play a key role in the differentiation of intracellular zoites in the ceca and could be an interesting candidate to develop a novel, effective anti-coccidian drug.
Hemorrhagic diarrhea in poultry is caused by Eimeria tenella, the most pathogenic avian coccidian parasite, and new approaches to treat the disease are continually being sought. Although eimeripain, a cathepsin B-like cysteine protease from E. tenella, has recently been identified as a novel anticoccidial drug target, its localization during the intracellular development of parasites remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate the expression of eimeripain during asexual and sexual development of E. tenella in vivo. Promature eimeripain was detected only in the early immature second generation of schizonts. In contrast, the mature eimeripain was most strongly detected in the middle-sized immature second generation of schizonts. Both promature and mature eimeripain disappeared depending on the maturation level of second generation of schizonts, but were strongly expressed again in the third generation of schizonts. In the sexual stage, both promature and mature eimeripain were detected in the cytoplasm of micro- and macro-gametocytes and zygotes, but expression became weak in zoites forming oocysts. Collectively, our findings suggest that eimeripain might play a key role in the differentiation of intracellular zoites in the ceca and could be an interesting candidate to develop a novel, effective anti-coccidian drug.
Eimeria tenella is widely considered to be the most pathogenic of chickenEimeria spp. due to its motility. The complex and monoxenous life cycle of
E. tenella is divided into intestinal and environmental stages. Oocysts
excreted with host feces undergo sporulation in the external environment and form four
sporocysts containing two sporozoites. Following ingestion of the sporulated oocysts by
chicken, sporozoites released in the intestines invade host cells, resulting in three asexual
(development of schizonts for formation of merozoites) and one sexual (development of micro-
and macro-gametocytes and formation of zygotes) development phases [4]. Consequently, the host presents bloody diarrhea, a decrease in weight
gain and eventual death. Although prophylactic chemotherapy and vaccination using live
vaccines are viable options, the increase in resistant parasites and the difficulty involved
in production of live attenuated parasites underline the necessity to find alternative target
molecules and drugs.Recently, eimeripain, a cathepsin B-like cysteine protease of E. tenella,
has been enzymatically characterized, and some lead compounds against eimeripain have been
identified as novel anticoccidial drugs [8, 10]. However, these analyses were focused only on the
extracellular stage of E. tenella life cycle, including sporozoites. No
evidence exists that this enzyme could be expressed in asexual or sexual developmental stages,
even though effective antiparasite drugs preferentially target molecules expressed at the
intracellular stages in hosts. These enzymes have a prodomain and a mature domain, and the
prodomain needs to be cleaved for full activity of the enzyme. In the present study, we
analyzed native eimeripain as a promature and mature enzyme during the intracellular stages in
the chicken ceca at the mRNA and protein levels to resolve this important question.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Parasites and chicks: The NIAH strain of E. tenella,
which is virulent and maintained at the Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute
of Animal Health (Tsukuba, Japan), was used throughout this study. The parasites were
maintained by passage in 2- to 3-week-old chicks (Nisseiken, Tokyo, Japan). The chicks were
housed in wire-floored cages in coccidian-free rooms and with free access to feed and water
that contained no anticoccidial drugs or antibiotics. The animals were treated in accordance
with protocols approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee, NIAH (Approval nos. 11-026 and
12-029). They were orally inoculated with 2 × 104 oocysts, and feces were
collected after 6–8 days. Oocysts were purified from feces using the sugar flotation
method.Preparation of developmental zoites: The purified E.
tenella oocysts were incubated for various time periods (0 hr, 48 hr and 144 hr)
at 28°C in 2.5% potassium dichromate (Wako, Osaka, Japan), treated with sodium hypochlorite
(Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) for 20 min at 4°C and then washed with phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS). This chemical treatment was repeated twice, followed by washing with PBS 5
times, and processed for further analysis as described below.For the purification of sporozoites, the sporulated oocysts were broken by vortexing with
glass beads for 1–2 min to release sporocysts. The sporocysts were treated in excystation
medium, 0.25% (w/v) trypsin (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and 1% (w/v) taurodeoxycholic acid
(Sigma, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.) in Hanks’ balanced salt solution (Sigma), pH 7.4, at 41°C in
a 5% CO2 incubator for 90–100 min. The sporozoites were obtained by purification
involving two steps, namely centrifugation at 450 g for 2 min according to
a modification of a previously described method [12]
and a filtration protocol using 595 filter paper circles [5].Merozoites and schizonts of the second generation were purified by centrifugation using
Percoll (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Piscataway, NJ, U.S.A.) as reported previously [2]. Briefly, the chicks were orally inoculated with 2 ×
104 oocysts, and the infected ceca were removed at 96 to 108 hr
post-inoculation after euthanasia of animals according to protocols approved by the Animal
Care and Use Committee, NIAH (Approval nos. 11-026 and 12-029). After removal of the
contents and washing with PBS, the ceca were cut into less than 5 mm pieces and filtered by
a wire mesh. These steps were performed on ice. The filtered homogenate was mixed with 100%
Percoll to make a 30% Percoll-PBS homogenate and layered over 50% Percoll-PBS, which were
finally layered over PBS. A total of three layers was prepared and centrifuged at 1,300
g for 15 min. After centrifugation, a high population of schizonts was
seen floating on the 30% Percoll-PBS; merozoites were concentrated on the 50% Percoll-PBS,
while erythrocytes were collected as a red pellet at the bottom. These zoites were aspirated
and washed with PBS three times. The merozoites were filtered using 595 filter paper circles
as described above.Sections of the infected ceca were prepared as described previously [4]. Briefly, 2-week-old chicks in groups of three were inoculated with 2 ×
104 oocysts, and the infected ceca were removed at 72 hr, 96 hr, 120 hr, 144 hr
and 168 hr post-inoculation and then fixed. The ceca embedded in paraffin were cut at a
thickness of 4 µm.Cloning and sequencing of eimeripain: The gene coding for eimeripain was
partially identified from the E. tenella Gene Index Database (Sequence No.
CD658426). For cloning of the full-length eimeripain, 5′ and 3′ rapid amplification of cDNA
ends (RACE) was performed using the SMARTer RACE cDNA Amplification Kit (Takara, Otsu,
Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol using these primers: EtCathep-F1; CAA CTT
CGA CCA CGT GCC CAT TTC TCT T for the 5′end and EtCathep-F14; TAC TGG CTA GCT GTG AAC AGC
TGG for the 3′end. The putative signal sequence of eimeripain was analyzed using the
prediction server SignalP V4.1 [6]. By sequence
analysis of RACE products, 1,536 bp of eimeripain was cloned as the complete coding region.
All sequences were completely identical with those previously reported [8, 10]. This
molecule also contained approximately 410 bp and 1,180 bp non-coding regions at the 5′ and
3′ ends, respectively, consisting of a 512 amino acid protein, with a signal peptide of 21
hydrophobic amino acids, a predicted molecular weight of 54.68 kDa and a pI of 5.53
(excluding signal peptide) using PeptideMass [14].Expression of eimeripain: The open reading frame (ORF) of eimeripain was
amplified by PCR from a cDNA of sporulated oocysts using a set of primers [forward:
ReEtCathep-F1 (CGG GGT ACC CCG ATG CCC TCC GAT GAT TTG GGC), reverse: ReEtCathep-F2 (GGG GTA
CCC CTC ATA GGT CCT GCG CTG ACG G)] containing Kpn I restriction sites. PCR was performed
for 5 min at 94°C followed by 30 cycles of 30 sec at 94°C, 30 sec at 63.4°C and 2 min at
72°C and a final elongation at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR product and the vector pTrcHisB
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A.) were digested by Kpn I restriction enzymes. The purified
PCR product was inserted into the Kpn I sites of the vector pTrcHisB using DNA ligation kit
(Takara). The inserted eimeripain sequence was confirmed using internal primers. The
resultant plasmid was transformed into competent cells of Escherichia coli
Top10F’ strain (Invitrogen) following the conventional method. The expression of eimeripain
in E. coli with a Polyhistidine-tag was performed according to the
procedure described by Tsuji et al. [13]. Briefly, the transfected cells were allowed to grow in SOB medium (BD,
Franklin Lakes, NJ, U.S.A.) containing 50 mg ampicillin/ml at 37°C. To
induce recombinant protein expression, isopropyl-b-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added
at 1 mM concentration, and the culture was grown for an additional 4 hr at 37°C. The culture
was then centrifuged at 10,000 g for 20 min and 4°C, and then, the pellet
was resuspended in lysis buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate and 500 mM sodium chloride, pH 7.8)
with egg white lysozyme (100 µg/ml). The suspension was
sonicated on ice with an ultrasonic processor (Taitec, Saitama, Japan) followed by freezing
and thawing. After three cycles of this treatment, the E. coli lysate was
centrifuged at 23,900 g for 30 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was
collected. As a result, eimeripain was successfully expressed in E. coli,
harvested as a soluble protein from bacterial cultures, separated on 12.5% SDS–PAGE gel and
detected as an approximately 60 kDa fusion protein by Western blotting using an anti-His
monoclonal antibody (Nacalai Tesque) as described below. The recombinant protein was
purified using ProBond™ resin (Invitrogen) as described by the manufacturer. Purified
recombinant eimeripain was separated on 12.5% SDS–PAGE gel and detected as a single band by
staining with 0.2% Coomassi Brilliant Blue R-250 (Wako) (Fig. 1). Protein concentration was calculated using the BCA protein assay kit (Pierce,
Rockford, IL, U.S.A.), and protein was stored at −20°C until further use.
Fig. 1.
SDS-PAGE of fusion-protein recombinant eimeripain after purification of ProBond™
resin. L: molecular weight marker, 1; recombinant eimeripain.
SDS-PAGE of fusion-protein recombinant eimeripain after purification of ProBond™
resin. L: molecular weight marker, 1; recombinant eimeripain.Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR): For RT-PCR, six
samples of unsporulated oocysts, sporulated oocysts incubated for 48 hr and 144 hr, and
purified sporozoites, merozoites and schizonts were used. They were washed in PBS and
submerged in RLT lysis buffer (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Total RNA from each sample was
extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Single stranded cDNA for mRNA was prepared using the Takara RNA PCR Kit (AMV) Ver.3.0
(Takara) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Four hundred nanograms of total RNA was
used for RT before PCR. As a control, RNA from chicken cells purified by the protocol for
schizonts and merozoites using non-infected ceca were used, because chicken cells might
contain purified schizonts or merozoites. The synthesized cDNAs were used for PCR using
eimeripain [forward: EtCathep-F5 (ATT CTG CGA GAT GTA GAG AAG GAT ATT), reverse: EtCathep-R5
(CTG GAT CTG AAT AGA AAG AAA GGT AAG T)] (499bp) and E. tenella actin
(350bp) [9] specific oligonucleotides. As an
additional control, RNA samples treated with the same protocol for synthesizing cDNA without
transcriptase were used. PCR was performed for 5 min at 94°C followed by 40 cycles of 30 sec
at 94°C, 60 sec at 53°C and 60 sec at 72°C and finally elongation at 72°C for 10 min. The
PCR product was subjected to electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel.Polyclonal antisera against eimeripain: An antiserum against the
eimeripain was raised by immunizing BALB/c mice subcutaneously with 100 µg
of purified recombinant protein emulsified with complete Freund’s adjuvant (Difco
Laboratories, Detroit, MI, U.S.A.), followed by booster immunizations of 50
µg at 2 weeks apart using the same route five times. The immunized mice
were sacrificed 1 week after the last booster, and serum was collected and stored at −20°C
for further use.The peptide CGGEPKVPNDKNAS, amino acids 257 to 270 of the mature domain of eimeripain as
previously reported [10], were synthesized and
coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) (Pierce). This synthetic peptide was used to
raise polyclonal antibodies against the mature domain of eimeripain in a Japanese white
rabbit by subcutaneous injection of 400 µg of the antigen emulsified with
complete Freund’s adjuvant (Difco Laboratories). The protocol was the same as that described
above, except for the booster immunizations using 200 µg of antigen.Western blotting: The sporulated oocysts (48 hr incubation) and purified
sporozoites, merozoites and schizonts were resuspended in PBS. They were freeze-thawed five
times, sonicated in an ice bath with the ultrasonic processor (Taitec) and centrifuged at
600 g for 5 min. The supernatant was aliquoted and cryopreserved at −80°C
until use. The concentration of crude antigens was determined by BCA protein assay kit
(Pierce). These parasite lysates (10–20 µg) and the purified recombinant
protein of eimeripain (2 µg) were separated through 12.5% SDS-PAGE gels
under reducing conditions, and the proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes
(GE Healthcare Life Sciences). The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk in Tris-buffered
saline (TBS) for 30 min and then incubated with polyclonal antibodies against the
recombinant eimeripain or the peptide corresponding to the eimeripain mature domain
(1:1,000) for 1 hr at room temperature. They were washed with TBS containing 0.05% Tween 20
(TBS-T) and then incubated with alkaline phosphate-conjugated goat anti-mouse or rabbitIgG
(H + L) (Zymed, South San Francisco, CA, U.S.A.) as a secondary antibody for 1 hr. The
membrane was washed again with TBS-T, and the bound antibody was developed with nitroblue
tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (BCIP/NBT, Promega, Madison, WI,
U.S.A.).Indirect immunofluorescence assay: The purified sporozoites and merozoites
were applied to slide glass, air-dried and fixed by methanol. These prepared slides and
sections of infected ceca were blocked with 10% goat serum (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA,
U.S.A.) for 30 min, washed three times with 0.05% tween 20 in PBS (PBST) and then incubated
with polyclonal antibodies (diluted 1:1,000) against recombinant eimeripain and eimeripain
mature domain peptide for 1 hr. The slides were washed three times with PBST and then
incubated with green fluorescence-labeled mouse and rabbitIgG secondary antibodies [Alexa
Fluor®488 goat anti-(mouseIgG) (H + L) or anti-(rabbitIgG) (H + L);
Invitrogen] for 1 hr. They were observed under a fluorescence microscope (Leica, Wetzlar,
Germany). All steps were performed at room temperature.
RESULTS
Transcription of eimeripain: In the present study, the total RNA that was
first extracted from several stages of E. tenella was subjected to RT-PCR
analysis for transcription profiling of eimeripain. By successful amplification of an
approximately 500 bp fragment, we confirmed that eimeripain was expressed in all examined
stages, namely oocyst (0 hr, 48 hr and 144 hr after sporulation), sporozoite, schizont and
merozoite stages, but not in samples of chicken cells or in any of the controls (Fig. 2A), although the expression between mRNA and protein did not always correlate.
E. tenella actin gene showed the same results with those of eimeripain
(Fig. 2B), except for E.
tenella genomic DNA.
Fig. 2.
Expression of eimeripain genes during the developmental stages of E.
tenella. Detection of eimeripain (499 bp) (A) and E.
tenella actin (350 bp) (B) specific RNA. L; DNA marker, 1; RNA from
unsporulated oocysts, 2; from oocysts sporulated at 48 hr, 3; from oocysts sporulated
at 144 hr, 4; from purified sporozoites, 5; from purified schizonts, 6; from purified
merozoites, 7 and 8; from chicken cells separated on a 30%, and 50% Percoll layer
using uninfected chicken ceca, respectively, 9; only PCR buffer, 10; genomic DNA from
sporulated oocysts.
Expression of eimeripain genes during the developmental stages of E.
tenella. Detection of eimeripain (499 bp) (A) and E.
tenella actin (350 bp) (B) specific RNA. L; DNA marker, 1; RNA from
unsporulated oocysts, 2; from oocysts sporulated at 48 hr, 3; from oocysts sporulated
at 144 hr, 4; from purified sporozoites, 5; from purified schizonts, 6; from purified
merozoites, 7 and 8; from chicken cells separated on a 30%, and 50% Percoll layer
using uninfected chicken ceca, respectively, 9; only PCR buffer, 10; genomic DNA from
sporulated oocysts.Endogenous form of eimeripain: In order to identify the endogenous form of
eimeripain, anti-eimeripain antibodies were prepared using recombinant eimeripain and a
peptide corresponding to the mature domain of eimeripain. By Western blotting analysis, the
two polyclonal antibodies generated against eimeripain recognized the recombinant eimeripain
fusion protein as a 60 kDa band (Fig. 3A and
3B, lane 5), and thus, these epitopes were confirmed to be present within the amino acid
sequence of eimeripain. Consequently, a 54 kDa band of promature eimeripain, previously
reported [8], was detected in all stages of sporulated
oocysts, sporozoites, merozoites and schizonts examined with the antiserum against
recombinant eimeripain (Fig. 3A, lanes 1–4). A 33
kDa band, which has been reported as the active form of eimeripain [8], was recognized only in sporulated oocysts and schizonts (Fig. 3B, lanes 1 and 3). Unexpectedly, the 54 kDa band
of promature eimeripain was also detected in schizonts (Fig. 3B, lane 3). These results show that antisera against recombinant eimeripain
and eimeripain mature domain recognize promature and mature eimeripain, respectively, and
that mature eimeripain is undetectable or does not exist in invasive zoites like sporozoites
and merozoites, but only in sporulated oocysts and developmental schizonts.
Fig. 3.
Western blot analysis using antisera with anti-eimeripain (A) and anti-peptide
against eimeripain mature domain (B). L: molecular weight marker, 1; sporulated
oocysts, 2, purified sporozoites, 3 and 4; purified schizonts and merozoites of the
second generation, 5; purified recombinant eimeripain. Arrows, arrowhead and arrows
with broken line show 33 kDa mature eimeripain, 54 kDa promature eimeripain and 60 kDa
recombinant eimeripain protein, respectively.
Western blot analysis using antisera with anti-eimeripain (A) and anti-peptide
against eimeripain mature domain (B). L: molecular weight marker, 1; sporulated
oocysts, 2, purified sporozoites, 3 and 4; purified schizonts and merozoites of the
second generation, 5; purified recombinant eimeripain. Arrows, arrowhead and arrows
with broken line show 33 kDa mature eimeripain, 54 kDa promature eimeripain and 60 kDa
recombinant eimeripain protein, respectively.Endogenous localization of eimeripain in invasive zoites: Promature
eimeripain was detected in the cytoplasm of sporozoites and merozoites by incubating with
the antiserum against recombinant protein (Fig.
4). They were observed as several dots, but not all over the entire region of
sporozoite and merozoite bodies, although these reactivities were not strong. The antibody
against the eimeripain mature domain did not show any reactivity with these zoites (data not
shown).
Fig. 4.
Immunofluorescent staining of sporozoites (A) and merozoites (B) with antibody
against promature eimeripain (arrows). Left and right figures show fluorescent and
bright field photos. Scale bar is 10 µm.
Immunofluorescent staining of sporozoites (A) and merozoites (B) with antibody
against promature eimeripain (arrows). Left and right figures show fluorescent and
bright field photos. Scale bar is 10 µm.Endogenous localization during asexual stages: During the second
generation, in sections at 72 hr, 96 hr and 120 hr post-infection, promature eimeripain was
detected only in early schizonts at around 10 µm in size, as constellations
of dots in the cytoplasm (Fig. 5A); it was not detected in schizonts over 15 µm (Fig. 5B and 5C). On the other hand, mature eimeripain was observed
over the entire cytoplasm surrounding the nuclei in small immature schizonts and in
developmental second-generation schizonts of middle size (around 20 µm)
with the strongest reactivity (Fig. 5D and 5E). In
mature schizonts, this reactivity became weak and seemed to be present only between
merozoites in the mature schizonts (Fig. 5F). In
the third generation schizonts at 144 hr, reactivity of promature eimeripain was similar to
that of the second generation, and this enzyme was observed as dots in the cytoplasm. Mature
eimeripain was present as dots in the cytoplasm of small immature third schizonts and
observed over the entire cytoplasm of large immature ones (Fig. 5G and 5H), but disappeared in mature third schizonts (data not
shown).
Fig. 5.
Immunofluorescent staining of asexual stages, the second generation schizonts (A) and
the third generation schizonts (B) with antisera against promature (upper photos) and
mature (bottom photos) eimeripain. Figures A and D are small immature schizonts of the
second generation, B and E are large immature schizonts, and C and F are mature
schizonts. Figures G and H show the third generation schizonts. Arrowheads and arrows
show smaller immature schizonts and larger immature ones of the third generation in
Fig. H. Scale bar is 10 µm.
Immunofluorescent staining of asexual stages, the second generation schizonts (A) and
the third generation schizonts (B) with antisera against promature (upper photos) and
mature (bottom photos) eimeripain. Figures A and D are small immature schizonts of the
second generation, B and E are large immature schizonts, and C and F are mature
schizonts. Figures G and H show the third generation schizonts. Arrowheads and arrows
show smaller immature schizonts and larger immature ones of the third generation in
Fig. H. Scale bar is 10 µm.Endogenous localization during the sexual stage: At the sexual stage,
reactivities were found to be similar between promature and mature eimeripain (Fig. 6A and 6B) and different from those of the asexual stages described above. Both types of
eimeripain were observed in the wall-forming bodies and cytoplasm of immature
macro-gametocytes, only in the wall-forming bodies of mature macro-gametocytes, and across
the cytoplasm of micro-gametocytes. In zygotes signals were present over the entire
cytoplasm, except in the nuclei. At the oocyst formation stage, the final step of sexual
development, which is seen as a distorted shape, eimeripain was weakly observed in the
cytoplasm around the inner oocyst wall as spots (Fig. 6A
and 6B, upper right figures).
Fig. 6.
Immunofluorescent staining of sexual stage with antibodies against promature (A) and
mature (B) eimeripain. Arrowheads, arrows and asterisks show macro-gametocytes with a
prominent wall forming body, micro-gametocytes and zygotes, respectively. Boxed
figures are early zoites forming oocysts. Scale bar is 10 µm.
Immunofluorescent staining of sexual stage with antibodies against promature (A) and
mature (B) eimeripain. Arrowheads, arrows and asterisks show macro-gametocytes with a
prominent wall forming body, micro-gametocytes and zygotes, respectively. Boxed
figures are early zoites forming oocysts. Scale bar is 10 µm.
DISCUSSION
Eimeripain has been proposed as a candidate drug target to be exploited against chickencoccidiosis in the future [8, 10]. In those studies, a panel of inhibitors was tested against the
enzyme and three new inhibitors were identified [10].
Moreover, it was confirmed that eimeripain was expressed in the extracellular stage during
sporulation [8]; however, no other life cycle stage
was examined for its expression so far. In the present study, we generated two antisera
against eimeripain; one recognized promature eimeripain, while the other recognized
eimeripain by Western blotting. As a result, the eimeripain was detected as protein of
promature at examined in all examined stages of sporulated oocysts, and purified
sporozoites, merozoites and schizonts. While, mature protein was identified as 33 kDa
molecule only at sporulated oocysts and schizonts, but not sporozoites and merozoites.
Probably, the epitope recognized by anti-peptide sera against eimeripain mature domain might
be masked by the modification of carbohydrate chain or protein folding in promature
eimeripain before maturation. Interestingly, this polyclonal antibody also identified a 54
kDa band in schizonts, but did not react with sporozoites or merozoites. There is a
possibility that purified schizonts represent many developmental stages from immature to
mature second-generation schizonts, and thus, mature eimeripain of 54 kDa might be contained
before complete maturation. These results suggest that mature eimeripain do not exist in
invasive zoites, but only in sporulated oocysts and developmental schizonts.By indirect immunofluorescence assay, the reactivities of promature eimeripain in
sporozoites and merozoites were similar to that seen in transfected sporozoites, as
previously reported [8], but mature eimeripain was
not. In intracellular developmental stages, the promature enzyme was detected in the
cytoplasm of early schizonts of the second and third generations, but disappeared during
their respective developments. Meanwhile, mature protein was present in the entire
cytoplasm, but later was not detected. Thus, the promature protein is present as dots in the
early asexual schizonts and probably sporozoites and merozoites as well, and active
eimeripain might spread throughout the cytoplasm during development or differentiation of
schizonts. These findings tempt speculation that eimeripain might play a key role in the
differentiation of intracellular zoites in the ceca in addition to the extracellular
stage.Cathepsins, which are cysteine proteases related to papain-like enzymes (clan CA, family
C1), are major virulence factors expressed by apicomplexan parasites [1, 3, 11]. For instance, in Toxoplasma gondii, antisense or
inhibitors of cathepsin B can block the invasion of tachyzoites into host cells and cause
abnormal rhoptry morphology [7]. In higher eukaryotic
cells, acidic cathepsin is important for protein processing and breakdown in lysosomes.
However, the lysosomal system of E. tenella, like that of
Toxoplasma gondii, has not been characterized. In our study, eimeripain
was expressed in all examined intracellular stages at both mRNA and protein levels. Although
more detailed functional characteristics remain to be analyzed, this enzyme might correlate
with asexual and sexual development with a fundamental biological function. Therefore, the
results reported here offer evidence that compounds of inhibitors could be effective
candidates for novel drug discovery against chickencoccidiosis.
Authors: M R Wilkins; I Lindskog; E Gasteiger; A Bairoch; J C Sanchez; D F Hochstrasser; R D Appel Journal: Electrophoresis Date: 1997 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: M Matsubayashi; T Hatta; T Miyoshi; M A Alim; K Yamaji; K Shimura; T Isobe; N Tsuji Journal: Parasitology Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 3.234