Literature DB >> 24365650

Early determination of prognosis by interim 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine PET in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Hyewon Lee1, Seok-ki Kim, Yong-il Kim, Tae Sung Kim, Se Hun Kang, Weon Seo Park, Tak Yun, Hyeon-Seok Eom.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: PET is a potentially useful modality for response analysis and prognosis prediction in patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The thymidine analog 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT) was recently introduced as a new tracer. (18)F-FLT uptake correlates with tumor cell proliferation and is suggested to reflect early response to treatment. We performed a prospective study to evaluate the prognostic value of early interim (18)F-FLT PET in patients with NHL.
METHODS: Patients with untreated NHL were enrolled between 2005 and 2007. Among them, 61 pairs of (18)F-FLT PET images were obtained at baseline (pre), after 1 cycle of chemotherapy (interim), and at the end of all scheduled first-line chemotherapy (final). All (18)F-FLT PET scans were interpreted by quantitative methods (maximum standardized uptake value [SUV max] and mean standardized uptake value [SUV mean]). Receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis was performed to define (18)F-FLT PET positivity using a cutoff value predicting disease progression, relapse, or death. Survival outcome was measured by progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates.
RESULTS: Receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis of SUV max for prediction of disease progression and death showed the highest area under the curve (AUC) in interim (18)F-FLT PET scans (AUC of 0.841 for PFS and 0.834 for OS, with a cutoff of 1.86; P < 0.001), compared with pre and final (18)F-FLT PET scans. The SUV mean in interim (18)F-FLT PET scans also showed better prediction (AUC of 0.842 for PFS and 0.824 for OS, with a cutoff value of 1.65; P < 0.001) than pre and final (18)F-FLT PET scans. Patients with an interim (18)F-FLT PET SUV max more than 1.86, who were defined as the interim PET-positive group, were associated with worse 5-y PFS and OS rates than the interim PET-negative group (for PFS: 52.0% vs. 80.7%, respectively, and P < 0.001; for OS: 56.2% vs. 81.4%, respectively, and P < 0.001). By multivariable analysis, the prognostic value of interim (18)F-FLT PET positivity by SUV max remained significant after adjustment with other prognostic factors (for PFS: hazard ratio, 7.82, 95% confidence interval, 1.65-36.96, and P = 0.009; for OS: hazard ratio, 5.55, 95% confidence interval, 1.47-33.77, and P = 0.014).
CONCLUSION: In patients with aggressive NHL, early interim (18)F-FLT PET is a significant predictor of PFS and OS. Early (18)F-FLT PET imaging also has a potential to identify patients with delayed response and nonfavorable prognosis despite achieving a clinical complete response.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FLT; non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL); positron emission tomography (PET); prognosis; standardized uptake value

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24365650     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.124172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  10 in total

1.  Prospective Study of 3'-Deoxy-3'-18F-Fluorothymidine PET for Early Interim Response Assessment in Advanced-Stage B-Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Heiko Schöder; Andrew D Zelenetz; Paul Hamlin; Somali Gavane; Steven Horwitz; Matthew Matasar; Alison Moskowitz; Ariela Noy; Lia Palomba; Carol Portlock; David Straus; Ravinder Grewal; Jocelyn C Migliacci; Steven M Larson; Craig H Moskowitz
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Molecular imaging with FLT: a case of Cassandra's curse?

Authors:  Rodney J Hicks
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Role of 18F-FLT PET/CT in suspected recurrent or residual lymphoma: final results of a pilot prospective trial.

Authors:  Lucia Zanoni; Alessandro Broccoli; Alessandro Lambertini; Cinzia Pellegrini; Vittorio Stefoni; Filippo Lodi; Cristina Fonti; Cristina Nanni; Pier Luigi Zinzani; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Prospective Multicenter Comparison of Early Interim FLT PET/CT versus FDG PET/CT with IHP, EORTC, Deauville, and PERCIST Criteria for Early Therapeutic Monitoring.

Authors:  Ryogo Minamimoto; Luis Fayad; Ranjana Advani; Julie Vose; Homer Macapinlac; Jane Meza; Jordan Hankins; Felix Mottaghy; Malik Juweid; Andrew Quon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Applications of PET imaging with the proliferation marker [18F]-FLT.

Authors:  M Peck; H A Pollack; A Friesen; M Muzi; S C Shoner; E G Shankland; J R Fink; J O Armstrong; J M Link; K A Krohn
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.346

Review 6.  Novel Tracers and Radionuclides in PET Imaging.

Authors:  Christian Mason; Grayson R Gimblet; Suzanne E Lapi; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 1.947

Review 7.  FDG-PET imaging in hematological malignancies.

Authors:  L Valls; C Badve; S Avril; K Herrmann; P Faulhaber; J O'Donnell; N Avril
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 8.250

8.  3'-deoxy-3'-[¹⁸F]-fluorothymidine PET/CT in early determination of prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer: comparison with [¹⁸F]-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Haojun Chen; Yimin Li; Hua Wu; Long Sun; Qin Lin; Long Zhao; Hanxiang An
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 9.  Drug Discovery by Molecular Imaging and Monitoring Therapy Response in Lymphoma.

Authors:  Senthilkumar Kalimuthu; Ju Hye Jeong; Ji Min Oh; Byeong-Cheol Ahn
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Week one FLT-PET response predicts complete remission to R-CHOP and survival in DLBCL.

Authors:  Ken Herrmann; Andreas K Buck; Tibor Schuster; Kathrin Abbrederis; Christina Blümel; Ivan Santi; Martina Rudelius; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Christian Peschel; Markus Schwaiger; Tobias Dechow; Ulrich Keller
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-06-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.