Froukje E de Vries1, Stella J de Wit2, Danielle C Cath3, Ysbrand D van der Werf4, Vionne van der Borden2, Thomas B van Rossum2, Anton J L M van Balkom2, Nic J A van der Wee5, Dick J Veltman2, Odile A van den Heuvel6. 1. Department of Psychiatry (FEdV, SJdW, VvdB, TBvR, AJLMvB, DJV, OAvdH), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam (FEdV, SJdW, YDvdW, DJV, OAvdH), VU University, Amsterdam. Electronic address: fe.devries@vumc.nl. 2. Department of Psychiatry (FEdV, SJdW, VvdB, TBvR, AJLMvB, DJV, OAvdH), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam (FEdV, SJdW, YDvdW, DJV, OAvdH), VU University, Amsterdam. 3. Altrecht Academic Anxiety Center (DCC), Utrecht; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology (DCC), Utrecht University, Utrecht. 4. Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences (YDvdW, OAvdH), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (YDvdW), an Institute of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam. 5. Department of Psychiatry and Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (NJAvdW), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Psychiatry (FEdV, SJdW, VvdB, TBvR, AJLMvB, DJV, OAvdH), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam (FEdV, SJdW, YDvdW, DJV, OAvdH), VU University, Amsterdam; Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences (YDvdW, OAvdH), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Subtle deficits in executive functioning are present in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and their first-degree relatives, suggesting involvement of the frontoparietal circuits. The neural correlates of working memory may be a neurocognitive endophenotype of OCD. METHODS: Forty-three unmedicated OCD patients, 17 unaffected siblings, and 37 matched comparison subjects performed a visuospatial n-back task, with a baseline condition (N0) and three working memory load levels (N1, N2, N3) during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Task-related brain activity was compared between groups in frontoparietal regions of interest. Generalized psychophysiological interaction analyses were used to study task-related changes in functional connectivity. RESULTS: Obsessive-compulsive disorder patients, compared with comparison subjects and siblings, showed increased error rates at N3. Compared with comparison subjects, OCD patients showed task-related hyperactivation in left dorsal frontal areas and left precuneus associated with better task performance. Siblings exhibited hyperactivation in a bilateral frontoparietal network. Increased task load was associated with increased task-related brain activity, but in OCD patients and siblings this increase was smaller from load N2 to N3 than in comparison subjects. Obsessive-compulsive disorder patients, compared with siblings and comparison subjects, showed increased task-related functional connectivity between frontal regions and bilateral amygdala. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that compensatory frontoparietal brain activity in OCD patients and their unaffected relatives preserves task performance at low task loads but is insufficient to maintain performance at high task loads. Frontoparietal dysfunction may constitute a neurocognitive endophenotype for OCD, possibly reflecting limbic interference with and neural inefficiency within the frontoparietal network.
BACKGROUND:Subtle deficits in executive functioning are present in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and their first-degree relatives, suggesting involvement of the frontoparietal circuits. The neural correlates of working memory may be a neurocognitive endophenotype of OCD. METHODS: Forty-three unmedicated OCDpatients, 17 unaffected siblings, and 37 matched comparison subjects performed a visuospatial n-back task, with a baseline condition (N0) and three working memory load levels (N1, N2, N3) during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Task-related brain activity was compared between groups in frontoparietal regions of interest. Generalized psychophysiological interaction analyses were used to study task-related changes in functional connectivity. RESULTS:Obsessive-compulsive disorderpatients, compared with comparison subjects and siblings, showed increased error rates at N3. Compared with comparison subjects, OCDpatients showed task-related hyperactivation in left dorsal frontal areas and left precuneus associated with better task performance. Siblings exhibited hyperactivation in a bilateral frontoparietal network. Increased task load was associated with increased task-related brain activity, but in OCDpatients and siblings this increase was smaller from load N2 to N3 than in comparison subjects. Obsessive-compulsive disorderpatients, compared with siblings and comparison subjects, showed increased task-related functional connectivity between frontal regions and bilateral amygdala. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that compensatory frontoparietal brain activity in OCDpatients and their unaffected relatives preserves task performance at low task loads but is insufficient to maintain performance at high task loads. Frontoparietal dysfunction may constitute a neurocognitive endophenotype for OCD, possibly reflecting limbic interference with and neural inefficiency within the frontoparietal network.
Authors: Christy A Olson; Lisa R Hale; Nancy Hamilton; Joshua N Powell; Laura E Martin; Cary R Savage Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2015-08-24 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Kate Dimond Fitzgerald; Yanni Liu; Timothy D Johnson; Jason S Moser; Rachel Marsh; Gregory L Hanna; Stephan F Taylor Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2018-04-21 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Amy L Friedman; Ashley Burgess; Karthik Ramaseshan; Phil Easter; Dalal Khatib; Asadur Chowdury; Paul D Arnold; Gregory L Hanna; David R Rosenberg; Vaibhav A Diwadkar Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2016-12-13 Impact factor: 2.376
Authors: Nicco Reggente; Teena D Moody; Francesca Morfini; Courtney Sheen; Jesse Rissman; Joseph O'Neill; Jamie D Feusner Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-02-12 Impact factor: 11.205