Literature DB >> 2436512

Isoprinosine and levamisole immunomodulation in artificially reared neonatal pigs.

K J Hennessy, F Blecha, D S Pollmann, E F Kluber.   

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to determine the capability of isoprinosine (ISO) and levamisole (LEV) to augment delayed-type hypersensitivity and lymphocyte blastogenic reactions in artificially reared pigs. Sow-reared pigs (n = 15) were kept with their dams; artificially reared pigs (n = 15) were removed from sows within 2 days after parturition and reared artificially for 21 days. Isoprinosine was administered orally (75 mg/kg/day) from days 0 to 10. Levamisole (2 mg) was injected subcutaneously on days 5 and 10. Control pigs were given distilled water orally from days 0 to 10 and injected subcutaneously with 0.15M NaCl on days 5 and 10. Lymphocyte proliferative responses to phytohemagglutinin, concanavalin A, and pokeweed mitogen were evaluated at week 2. The phytohemagglutinin skin-test responses were evaluated in all pigs at weeks 1 and 3 of the trial. Hematologic values, body weight, and mortality were evaluated each week. The skin-test responses and mitogen-induced lymphocyte proliferative responses were lower (P less than 0.05) in artificially reared controls when compared with responses in sow-reared pigs. However, ISO and LEV enhanced (P less than 0.05) the responses in the artificially reared pigs to values comparable with those of the sow-reared controls. Body weight was greater (P less than 0.01) in sow-reared pigs than in artificially reared pigs; drug treatment did not influence weight gain. These data indicated that immunopotentiation of the cellular immune responsiveness of artificially reared pigs may be possible with ISO or LEV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2436512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  4 in total

1.  Activated porcine alveolar macrophages: are biological response modifiers the answer?

Authors:  S K Chapes; C G Chitko; R C Thaler; J L Nelssen; G A Anderson; F Blecha
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.046

Review 2.  Rationale for using immunopotentiators in domestic food animals.

Authors:  F Blecha; B Charley
Journal:  Adv Vet Sci Comp Med       Date:  1990

3.  Influence of Inosine Pranobex on Cell Viability in Normal Fibroblasts and Liver Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Sylwia Tobólska; Sylwia Terpiłowska; Jerzy Jaroszewski; Andrzej Krzysztof Siwicki
Journal:  J Vet Res       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 1.744

4.  Genotoxicity and Mutagenicity of Inosine Pranobex.

Authors:  Sylwia Tobólska; Sylwia Terpiłowska; Jerzy Jaroszewski; Andrzej Krzysztof Siwicki
Journal:  J Vet Res       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 1.744

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.