| Literature DB >> 24363984 |
Gulab Dattarao Khedkar1, A Chandrashekar Reddy2, Tetszuan Benny Ron3, David Haymer4.
Abstract
Quality production of the shrimp Penaeus monodon in hatchery operations depends heavily on the evaluation of genetic diversity and population structure of brood stocks. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences have been widely used to study genetic variability and relationships in many crustacean groups, and these same markers may be incorporated into evaluation studies of shrimp broods and populations. For this purpose we looked at variation in mitochondrial D-loop sequences as an indicator of genetic diversity in shrimp populations from a region of India that represents the main sources of new material for brood stocks. In our study of these populations the overall mean genetic diversity was 0.191. The highest level of genetic diversity (0.357) was observed in the Kakinada population, whereas the lowest diversity (0.0171) was observed in the Nellore population. The results also indicate that overall, the populations along the Andhra Pradesh coast are genetically diverse despite the fact that there is considerable gene flow between them. From the results, it is evident that east cost of India shows high genetic diversity among P. monodon broods and no evidence of loss of diversity due to excessive inbreeding. The fact that the genetic variability of these populations has been maintained, despite ten years of dependence on these broods, shows that at the present time there is no indication of over exploitation.Entities:
Keywords: Diversity; Dloop; Hatchery; Mt DNA; Penaeus monodon; Population genetics
Year: 2013 PMID: 24363984 PMCID: PMC3868705 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-671
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Figure 1Sampling locations along the East Coast of India.
D-loop sequence based diversity analysis
| No. of seq. | NCBI accession numbers | No. of seg. sites S | No. of Haplotype | Haplotype diversity Hd | No. of polymorphic loci | Expected heterogenity | Total no. of alleles | Avg. no. of differences K | Avg. no, of pairwise differences | Nucleotide diversity with JC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vizag | 27 | JQ863127-JQ863156 | 143 | 14 | 0.9195 | 38 | 0.03345 | 1.236 | 11.0022 | 6.386 | 0.035086 ± 0.01910 |
| Kakinada | 24 | JQ863157-JQ863186 | 251 | 21 | 0.9310 | 129 | 0.15094 | 1.934 | 40.1207 | 37.215 | 0.204479 ± 0.102747 |
| Nellore | 30 | JQ863187-JQ863216 | 23 | 8 | 0.8643 | 47 | 0.03468 | 1.165 | 4.8392 | 6.635 | 0.036457 ± 0.019701 |
| Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition/transversion values
| Statistics | Vizag | Kakinada | Nellore | Mean | S.D. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of transitions | 18 | 74 | 22 | 38.000 | 31.241 |
| No. of transversions | 25 | 96 | 8 | 43.000 | 46.680 |
| No. of substitutions | 43 | 170 | 30 | 81.000 | 77.350 |
AMOVA analysis
| Source of variation | d. f. | Sum of square | Variance components | Percentage of variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among population | 2 | 468.44 | 6.154 | 11.04 |
| within populations | 87 | 4312.83 | 49.57 | 88.96 |
Population pairwise FSTs
| Vizag | Kakinada | Nellore | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vizag | 0.0000 | ||
| Kakinada | 0.05309 | 0.00000 | |
| Nellore | 0.21819 | 0.09555 | 0.00000 |
Nm values between populations
| Gene flow (Nm) between populations | |
|---|---|
| Vizag and Kakinada | 4.775 |
| Vizag and Nellore | 3.048 |
| Kakinada and Nellore | 3.966 |
Figure 2Neighbor joining tree for populations.