Literature DB >> 24363842

Abuse potential of propofol used for sedation in gastric endoscopy and its correlation with subject characteristics.

Ja Hyun Kim1, Heewon Byun2, Jun Hyun Kim3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Propofol has been widely used for an induction and/or maintenance of general anesthesia, or for sedation for various procedures. Although it has many ideal aspects, there have been several cases of drug abuse and addiction. The authors investigated whether there are abuse liable groups among the general population.
METHODS: We surveyed 169 patients after gastric endoscopic examination, which used propofol as a sedative, with the Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI) questionnaire. Other characteristics of the patients, such as past history, smoking habits, depression, anxiety, alcohol abuse liability and sleep disturbance, were recorded by history taking and several questionnaires before the exam.
RESULTS: Propofol had a high Morphine-Benzedrine Group (MBG) score (representative value for euphoria) of 6.3, which is higher than marijuana, and a Pentobarbital-Chlorpromazine-Alcohol Group (PCAG) score (representative value of sedation) of 8.1, which is lower than most opioids. The MBG score showed no statistically significant correlation between any of the characteristics of the groups. In females, the PCAG score showed a correlation with age, and in males, it showed a correlation with a sleeping problem.
CONCLUSIONS: Propofol had relatively high euphoria and low residual sedative effects. It had a more potent sedative effect in the female group who were young, and in the male group who had a low sleep quality index. There were differences in the abuse liability from a single exposure to propofol in the general population. Further study is needed to evaluate the abuse liability of repeated exposure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Addictive behavior; Dependency; Hypnotics and sedatives; Intravenous substance abuse; Propofol

Year:  2013        PMID: 24363842      PMCID: PMC3866335          DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2013.65.5.403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol        ISSN: 2005-6419


  13 in total

1.  In vivo dopamine measurements in the nucleus accumbens after nonanesthetic and anesthetic doses of propofol in rats.

Authors:  Laure Pain; Serge Gobaille; Carmen Schleef; Dominique Aunis; Philippe Oberling
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 2.  Testing the abuse liability of anxiolytic and hypnotic drugs in humans.

Authors:  H de Wit; R R Griffiths
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Comparing the subjective, psychomotor and physiological effects of intravenous buprenorphine and morphine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  J P Zacny; K Conley; J Galinkin
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Propofol addiction initiated by anesthetic use.

Authors:  Anne Koopmann; Christoph von der Goltz; Derik Hermann; Falk Kiefer
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 18.112

5.  An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties.

Authors:  A T Beck; N Epstein; G Brown; R A Steer
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1988-12

6.  Physiologic, subjective, and behavioral effects of amphetamine, methamphetamine, ephedrine, phenmetrazine, and methylphenidate in man.

Authors:  W R Martin; J W Sloan; J D Sapira; D R Jasinski
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1971 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Antinociceptive, subjective and behavioral effects of smoked marijuana in humans.

Authors:  M K Greenwald; M L Stitzer
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II.

Authors:  J B Saunders; O G Aasland; T F Babor; J R de la Fuente; M Grant
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Propofol at a subanesthetic dose may have abuse potential in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  J P Zacny; J L Lichtor; W Thompson; J L Apfelbaum
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Chronic alcoholism increases the induction dose of propofol in humans.

Authors:  A Fassoulaki; R Farinotti; F Servin; J M Desmonts
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  5 in total

1.  Propofol abuse among healthcare workers: an analysis of criminal cases using the database of the Supreme Court of South Korea's judgments.

Authors:  Hye-Yeon Cho; Yoonbin Hwang; SuHwan Shin; Susie Yoon; Ho-Jin Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-03-15

2.  Guilty, or not guilty?: a short story of propofol abuse.

Authors:  Sangseok Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-11

3.  Abuse potential assessment of propofol by its subjective effects after sedation.

Authors:  Aysu Hayriye Tezcan; Dilsen Hatice Ornek; Onur Ozlu; Mustafa Baydar; Nurcan Yavuz; Nihal Gokbulut Ozaslan; Kevser Dilek; Aylin Keske
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  Sedation for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Practical Issues in Patient Safety and Quality Management.

Authors:  Seung Bae Yoon; Young-Seok Cho
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2016-01-28

5.  Comparison of recovery effect for sufentanil and remifentanil anesthesia with TCI in laparoscopic radical resection during colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yanyan Qi; Xiangyan Yao; Beibei Zhang; Xianhui DU
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.967

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.