| Literature DB >> 24363779 |
Yuantao Chen1, Weihong Xu1, Fangjun Kuang2, Shangbing Gao3.
Abstract
The efficient target tracking algorithm researches have become current research focus of intelligent robots. The main problems of target tracking process in mobile robot face environmental uncertainty. They are very difficult to estimate the target states, illumination change, target shape changes, complex backgrounds, and other factors and all affect the occlusion in tracking robustness. To further improve the target tracking's accuracy and reliability, we present a novel target tracking algorithm to use visual saliency and adaptive support vector machine (ASVM). Furthermore, the paper's algorithm has been based on the mixture saliency of image features. These features include color, brightness, and sport feature. The execution process used visual saliency features and those common characteristics have been expressed as the target's saliency. Numerous experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and timeliness of the proposed target tracking algorithm in video sequences where the target objects undergo large changes in pose, scale, and illumination.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24363779 PMCID: PMC3865687 DOI: 10.1155/2013/925341
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
Figure 1Visual saliency feature extraction algorithm flow diagram using adaptive SVM.
Figure 2Visual saliency calculation method.
Numerous results in the linear case.
| Data sets | Size | Algorithm |
| Training success rate | Test success rate | CPU execution time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Live disorder | Train: 250∗6 | Online | 100 | 98.41% | 96.82% | 2.4430 |
| Test: 95∗6 | ASVM | 20 | 99.74% | 97.14% | 1.5079 | |
| Letter-recognition | Train: 500∗16 | Online | 10 | 98.12% | 90.43% | 3.6875 |
| Test: 100∗16 | ASVM | 10 | 96.43% | 92.14% | 1.8594 | |
| Pendigits | Train: 700∗16 | Online | 10 | 78.18% | 75.71% | 4.8156 |
| Test: 500∗16 | ASVM | 10 | 81.16% | 79.23% | 1.4063 | |
| Tic-tac-toe | Train: 800∗9 | Online | 100 | 76.41% | 70.42% | 8.8126 |
| Test: 158∗9 | ASVM | 10 | 89.13% | 82.45% | 1.3468 | |
| Pima-diabetes | Train: 800∗21 | Online | 100 | 90.14% | 86.50% | 15.4012 |
| Test: 200∗21 | ASVM | 100 | 92.50% | 87.81% | 1.8500 |
Incremental learning outcomes nonlinear case.
| Data sets | Size | Algorithm | ( | Training success rate | Test success rate | CPU execution time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iris | Train: 150∗4 | Online | 100, 0.5 | 98.00% | 92.34% | 1.6209 |
| Test: 50∗4 | ASVM | 20, 0.025 | 100.00% | 97.74% | 1.0013 | |
| Live disorder | Train: 220∗6 | Online | 100, 0.01 | 97.13% | 94.72% | 3.0049 |
| Test: 125∗6 | ASVM | 100, 0.05 | 100.00% | 96.75% | 1.9227 | |
| Letter-recognition | Train: 400∗16 | Online | 10, 0.025 | 96.40% | 88.34% | 5.8750 |
| Test: 200∗16 | ASVM | 20, 0.025 | 100.00% | 91.50% | 2.2406 | |
| Waveform | Train: 400∗21 | Online | 10, 0.025 | 96.40% | 88.34% | 5.8750 |
| Test: 200∗21 | ASVM | 20, 0.025 | 100.00% | 91.50% | 2.2406 | |
| Pendigits | Train: 700∗16 | Online | 10, 0.025 | 82.12% | 70.60% | 9.3198 |
| Test: 300∗16 | ASVM | 100, 0.05 | 88.34% | 79.60% | 2.7969 |
Figure 3Three cases of visual saliency.
Figure 4Three cases of visual saliency.
Figure 5Target rotation, shape, and size variation of the tracking results.