| Literature DB >> 24363555 |
Hiroshi Kikuchi1, Nobuyoshi Shiozawa2, Shingo Takata2, Kozo Ashida2, Fumihiro Mitsunobu2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Controlled clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of repeated Waon therapy for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have yet to be conducted. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether repeated Waon therapy exhibits an adjuvant effect on conventional therapy for COPD patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective trial comprised 20 consecutive COPD patients who satisfied the criteria of the Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines, stages 1-4. They were assigned to either a Waon or control group. The patients in the Waon group received both repeated Waon therapy and conventional therapy, including medications, such as long-acting inhaled β2 agonists, long-acting anticholinergics and xanthine derivatives, and pulmonary rehabilitation. The Waon therapy consisted of sitting in a 60°C sauna room for 15 minutes, followed by 30 minutes of being warmed with blankets once a day, 5 days a week, for a total of 20 times. The patients in the control group received only conventional therapy. Pulmonary function and the 6-minute walk test were assessed before and at 4 weeks after the program.Entities:
Keywords: 6-minute walk test; airway obstruction; modified Borg scale; quality of life
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24363555 PMCID: PMC3865971 DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S50860
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis ISSN: 1176-9106
Baseline demographics of the study groups
| Waon (n=10) | Control (n=10) | |
|---|---|---|
| Male/female | 9/1 | 9/1 |
| Age, years | 70.3 ± 5.8 | 73.6 ± 6.1 |
| Smoking status | ||
| Former | 10 | 10 |
| Current | 0 | 0 |
| Pack years | 56 (27–94) | 57 (34–103) |
| FEV1, % pred | 54.1 ± 14.7 | 63.2 ± 26.6 |
| Resting SpO2, % | 95.6 ± 1.8 | 95.9 ± 0.7 |
| Height | 162.4 ± 5.0 | 160.4 ± 4.6 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 22.3 ± 2.4 | 23.0 ± 2.4 |
| Medication use | ||
| long-acting anticholinergics | 8 | 6 |
| long-acting β2 agonist | 9 | 8 |
| Xanthine derivatives | 7 | 7 |
| Lung physical therapy | 10 | 10 |
Note: Data are absolute numbers, presented as means ± SD or median (25th−75th percentile).
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; SpO2, oxygen saturation; BMI, body mass index.
Changes in the 6-minute walk test, at baseline and after 4 weeks
| Waon (n=10) | Control (n=10) | |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Borg scale | ||
| At baseline | 3.0 (1.6–7.0) | 3.5 (1.8–5.5) |
| After 4 weeks | 2.0 (0.37–5.0) | 2.5 (0.9–7.0) |
| Walk distance (m) | ||
| At baseline | 287 ± 131 | 291 ± 114 |
| After 4 weeks | 333 ± 106 | 310 ± 110 |
| Minimum SpO2 (%) | ||
| At baseline | 88 ± 5 | 85 ± 4 |
| After 4 weeks | 89 ± 5 | 87 ± 5 |
| Maximum heart rate (beats/min) | ||
| At baseline | 112 ± 20 | 101 ± 15 |
| After 4 weeks | 109 ± 26 | 107 ± 15 |
Note: Data are presented as means ± SD or median (25th−75th percentile).
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; SpO2, oxygen saturation.
Change in ventilatory parameters, at baseline and after 4 weeks
| Waon (n=10) | Control (n=10) | |
|---|---|---|
| PEF (L/s) | ||
| At baseline | 3.08 ± 0.999 | 3.85 ± 1.543 |
| After 4 weeks | 3.56 ± 1.478 | 3.73 ± 1.64 |
| FEF50 (L/s) | ||
| At baseline | 0.37 (0.31–0.71) | 0.50 (0.26–0.82) |
| After 4 weeks | 0.52 (0.29–0.82) | 0.52 (0.24–0.77) |
| FEF25 (L/s) | ||
| At baseline | 0.17 (0.15–0.27) | 0.22 (0.16–0.31) |
| After 4 weeks | 0.21 (0.12–0.33) | 0.22 (0.17–0.28) |
| VC (L) | ||
| At baseline | 2.87 ± 0.68 | 2.90 ± 0.65 |
| After 4 weeks | 3.16 ± 0.69 | 2.92 ± 0.63 |
| FVC (L) | ||
| At baseline | 2.6 ± 0.764 | 2.71 ± 0.936 |
| After 4 weeks | 2.77 ± 0.969 | 2.65 ± 0.869 |
| FEV1 (L) | ||
| At baseline | 1.22 ± 0.43 | 1.34 ± 0.66 |
| After 4 weeks | 1.35 ± 0.56 | 1.32 ± 0.644 |
Notes: Data are presented as means ± SD or median (25th−75th percentile).
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; PEF, peak expiratory flow; FEF50, forced expiratory flow after 50% of expired FVC; FEF25, forced expiratory flow after 75% of expired FVC; VC, vital capacity; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; L, Liter; L/s, Liter per second.
Figure 1Amount of change in VC for each patient for the pulmonary function test.
Notes: aP=0.077 compared with the control, analyzed by unpaired t-test. Data are presented as means ± SD.
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; VC, vital capacity; L, Liter.
Figure 3Amount of change in FEF50 for each patient for the pulmonary function test.
Notes: cP=0.019 compared with control, analyzed by Mann–Whitney test. Data are presented as median (with ranges in parentheses, 25th–75th percentile).
Abbreviations: FEF50, forced expiratory flow after 50% of expired forced vital capacity; L/s, Liter per second.
Figure 2Amount of change in PEF for each patient for the pulmonary function test.
Notes: bP=0.095 compared with the control, analyzed by unpaired t-test. Data are presented as means ± SD.
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; PEF, peak expiratory flow; L/s, Liter per second.