AIM: To assess the safety and utility of capsule endoscopy (CE) for children who are unable to swallow the capsule endoscope. METHODS: The medical records of all of the children who underwent CE between 2010 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group A included patients who were unable to swallow the capsule endoscope, and group B included patients who were able to swallow it. For the patients who were unable to swallow the capsule endoscope, it was placed in the duodenum endoscopically. The small bowel transit time, endoscopic diagnosis and complications of the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: During the study period, 28 CE procedures were performed in 26 patients. Group A included 11 patients with a median age of 2 years (range 10 mo-9 years), and group B included 15 patients with a median age of 12 years (range 8 years-16 years). The lightest child in the study weighed 7.9 kg. The detection rates did not differ between the 2 groups. The median small bowel transit time was 401 min (range 264-734 min) in group A and 227 min (range 56-512 min) in group B (P = 0.0078). No serious complications, including capsule retention, occurred. No significant mucosal trauma occurred in the pharynx, esophagus, stomach or duodenum when the capsule was introduced using an endoscope. CONCLUSION: CE is a safe and useful procedure for infants and young children who are unable to swallow the capsule endoscope.
AIM: To assess the safety and utility of capsule endoscopy (CE) for children who are unable to swallow the capsule endoscope. METHODS: The medical records of all of the children who underwent CE between 2010 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group A included patients who were unable to swallow the capsule endoscope, and group B included patients who were able to swallow it. For the patients who were unable to swallow the capsule endoscope, it was placed in the duodenum endoscopically. The small bowel transit time, endoscopic diagnosis and complications of the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: During the study period, 28 CE procedures were performed in 26 patients. Group A included 11 patients with a median age of 2 years (range 10 mo-9 years), and group B included 15 patients with a median age of 12 years (range 8 years-16 years). The lightest child in the study weighed 7.9 kg. The detection rates did not differ between the 2 groups. The median small bowel transit time was 401 min (range 264-734 min) in group A and 227 min (range 56-512 min) in group B (P = 0.0078). No serious complications, including capsule retention, occurred. No significant mucosal trauma occurred in the pharynx, esophagus, stomach or duodenum when the capsule was introduced using an endoscope. CONCLUSION: CE is a safe and useful procedure for infants and young children who are unable to swallow the capsule endoscope.
Authors: Gian Luigi de' Angelis; Fabiola Fornaroli; Nicola de' Angelis; Barbara Magiteri; Barbara Bizzarri Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Alex J Thompson; Michael Hughes; Salzitsa Anastasova; Laurie S Conklin; Tudor Thomas; Cadman Leggett; William A Faubion; Thomas J Miller; Peter Delaney; François Lacombe; Sacha Loiseau; Alexander Meining; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Guillermo J Tearney; Paul Kelly; Guang-Zhong Yang Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2017-11-15 Impact factor: 46.802
Authors: Jodie Ouahed; Elizabeth Spencer; Daniel Kotlarz; Dror S Shouval; Matthew Kowalik; Kaiyue Peng; Michael Field; Leslie Grushkin-Lerner; Sung-Yun Pai; Athos Bousvaros; Judy Cho; Carmen Argmann; Eric Schadt; Dermot P B Mcgovern; Michal Mokry; Edward Nieuwenhuis; Hans Clevers; Fiona Powrie; Holm Uhlig; Christoph Klein; Aleixo Muise; Marla Dubinsky; Scott B Snapper Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Alex J Thompson; Claire D Bourke; Ruairi C Robertson; Nirupama Shivakumar; Christine A Edwards; Tom Preston; Elaine Holmes; Paul Kelly; Gary Frost; Douglas J Morrison Journal: Gut Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 23.059