BACKGROUND: To prospectively evaluate an elastin-specific MR contrast agent (ESMA) for in vivo targeting of elastic fibers in myocardial infarction (MI) and postinfarction scar remodeling. METHODS AND RESULTS: MI was induced in C57BL/6J mice (n=40) by permanent ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery. MRI was performed at 7 and 21 days after MI. The merits of gadolinium-based ESMA (Gd-ESMA) were compared with gadopentetic acid (Gd-DTPA) for infarct size determination, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and enhancement kinetics. Specific binding in vivo was evaluated by blocking the molecular target using nonparamagnetic lanthanum-ESMA. In vivo imaging results were confirmed by postmortem triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining, elastica van Gieson staining, and Western blotting. Delayed enhancement MRI revealed prolonged enhancement of Gd-ESMA in the postischemic scar compared with Gd-DTPA. Infarct size measurements showed good agreement between Gd-ESMA and Gd-DTPA and were confirmed by ex vivo triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. Preinjection of the blocking lanthanum-ESMA resulted in significantly lower CNR of Gd-ESMA at the infarct site (P=0.0019). Although no significant differences in CNR were observed between delayed enhancement imaging and Gd-DTPA between days 7 and 21 (1.8± versus 3.8; P=ns), Gd-ESMA showed markedly higher CNR on day 21 after MI (14.1 versus 4.9; P=0.0032), which correlated with increased synthesis of tropoelastin detected by Western blot analysis and histology. Higher CNR values for Gd-ESMA further correlated with improved ejection fraction of the mice on day 21 after MI. CONCLUSIONS: Gd-ESMA enables targeting of elastin within the infarct scar in a mouse model of MI. The imaging properties of Gd-ESMA allow quantification of intrascar elastin content in vivo and thereby provide potential for noninvasive characterization of postinfarction scar remodeling.
BACKGROUND: To prospectively evaluate an elastin-specific MR contrast agent (ESMA) for in vivo targeting of elastic fibers in myocardial infarction (MI) and postinfarction scar remodeling. METHODS AND RESULTS: MI was induced in C57BL/6J mice (n=40) by permanent ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery. MRI was performed at 7 and 21 days after MI. The merits of gadolinium-based ESMA (Gd-ESMA) were compared with gadopentetic acid (Gd-DTPA) for infarct size determination, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and enhancement kinetics. Specific binding in vivo was evaluated by blocking the molecular target using nonparamagnetic lanthanum-ESMA. In vivo imaging results were confirmed by postmortem triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining, elastica van Gieson staining, and Western blotting. Delayed enhancement MRI revealed prolonged enhancement of Gd-ESMA in the postischemic scar compared with Gd-DTPA. Infarct size measurements showed good agreement between Gd-ESMA and Gd-DTPA and were confirmed by ex vivo triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. Preinjection of the blocking lanthanum-ESMA resulted in significantly lower CNR of Gd-ESMA at the infarct site (P=0.0019). Although no significant differences in CNR were observed between delayed enhancement imaging and Gd-DTPA between days 7 and 21 (1.8± versus 3.8; P=ns), Gd-ESMA showed markedly higher CNR on day 21 after MI (14.1 versus 4.9; P=0.0032), which correlated with increased synthesis of tropoelastin detected by Western blot analysis and histology. Higher CNR values for Gd-ESMA further correlated with improved ejection fraction of the mice on day 21 after MI. CONCLUSIONS:Gd-ESMA enables targeting of elastin within the infarct scar in a mouse model of MI. The imaging properties of Gd-ESMA allow quantification of intrascar elastin content in vivo and thereby provide potential for noninvasive characterization of postinfarction scar remodeling.
Entities:
Keywords:
magnetic resonance imaging; molecular imaging; myocardial infarction; ventricular remodeling
Authors: Isabel T Ramos; Markus Henningsson; Maryam Nezafat; Begoña Lavin; Silvia Lorrio; Pierre Gebhardt; Andrea Protti; Thomas R Eykyn; Marcelo E Andia; Ulrich Flögel; Alkystis Phinikaridou; Ajay M Shah; René M Botnar Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Moritz Wildgruber; Daniel Razansky; Ivana Ivankovic; Xosé Luís Déan-Ben; Helena Haas; Melanie A Kimm Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Andrea Protti; Begoña Lavin; Xuebin Dong; Silvia Lorrio; Simon Robinson; David Onthank; Ajay M Shah; Rene M Botnar Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 5.501