Literature DB >> 24362392

Continuous curricular feedback: a formative evaluation approach to curricular improvement.

Stanley Goldfarb1, Gail Morrison.   

Abstract

Curriculum evaluations are used to plan future revisions and other improvements in curriculum design. Most models are summative and occur at the end of a course, so improvements in instruction may be delayed. In this article, the authors describe the formative curriculum evaluation model adopted at the Raymond and Ruth Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. In their model, representative student feedback is gathered in real time and used to modify courses and improve instruction. The central features of their continuous feedback model include developing a small cadre of preclinical and clinical student evaluators who are trained to obtain classwide input regarding all aspects of the curriculum, including teacher effectiveness, and meet regularly (weekly or monthly) with relevant faculty and administrators. The authors show how this curriculum evaluation approach maximizes student involvement in course development and provides opportunities for rapid improvements in course content and instruction as well as for the identification of barriers to effective clinical and preclinical educational experiences.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24362392     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of Faculty: Are medical students and faculty on the same page?

Authors:  Elhadi Aburawi; Michelle McLean; Sami Shaban
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2014-07-24

2.  What Physicians Wished They Would Have Learned in Medical School: a Survey.

Authors:  Judith M Binstock; Maria A Pino; Louis H Primavera
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-01-03

3.  Rapid Feedback: Assessing Pre-clinical Teaching in the Era of Online Learning.

Authors:  Daniel Walden; Meagan Rawls; Sally A Santen; Moshe Feldman; Anna Vinnikova; Alan Dow
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2022-06-15

4.  Development and validation of a structured feedback questionnaire from postgraduates on various elements of postgraduate medical curriculum.

Authors:  Ramya Sugumar; Archana Prabu Kumar; K Maheshkumar; R Padmavathi; P Ramachandran; Latha Ravichandran; S Anandan; P V Vijayaraghavan
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2021-02-02

5.  Empowering medical students as agents of curricular change: a value-added approach to student engagement in medical education.

Authors:  Joseph R Geraghty; Alexandria N Young; Tiffani D M Berkel; Eric Wallbruch; Julie Mann; Yoon Soo Park; Laura E Hirshfield; Abbas Hyderi
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2020-02

6.  What is the impact of the Rashomon approach in primary care education?: An educational case report of implementing dialogue and improvisation into medical education.

Authors:  Akiteru Takamura; Rintaro Imafuku
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Quality Assurance of Undergraduate Medical Education in Israel by Continuous Monitoring and Prioritization of the Accreditation Standards.

Authors:  Jochanan Benbassat; Reuben Baumal; Robert Cohen
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2022-07-31

8.  Relationship between students' perceptions of the adequacy of M1 and M2 curricula and their performance on USMLE step 1 examination.

Authors:  Mohammed K Khalil; William S Wright; Kelsey A Spearman; Amber C Gaspard
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.