Literature DB >> 24361770

Values of T/QRS ratios measured during normal and post-term pregnancies.

Tomasz Fuchs.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate values and variability of T/QRS ratios between 28 and 42 weeks' gestation in term and post-term pregnancies using non-invasive methods with electrodes placed over the maternal abdomen.
METHODS: Fetal electrocardiograms were recorded from 657 women with singleton pregnancies. Recorded signals were analyzed by KOMPOREL software from ITAM (Zabrze, Poland) and the T/QRS ratios were automatically calculated. The analyses were performed in subgroups according to gestational age. The T/QRS ratio variables were calculated; one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA test) and linear regression were carried out.
RESULTS: The T/QRS ratio was successfully measured in 95.4% (n=627) of patients during 30 min recordings. Values of T/QRS ratio variables changed during pregnancy. The mean T/QRS ratio ranged between 0.134 in the 41st gestational week and 0.178 in the 35th gestational week. Mean minimal and maximum values of the T/QRS ratio ranged between 0.02 and 0.29 [x=0.09; standard deviation (SD)=0.05] and 0.08 and 0.5 (x=0.27; SD=0.1), respectively. The highest values occurred in pre-term and post-term pregnancies.
CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of the T/QRS ratio is one of the techniques used for non-invasive fetal distress assessment that can be used in antepartum fetal monitoring. Values of T/QRS ratio variables changed during pregnancy from higher in pre-term pregnancies, lower in the peripartum period and rose again in post-term pregnancies. The study provides more insight into the values of T/QRS ratios during pregnancy; however, additional research is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24361770     DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2013-0181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Med        ISSN: 0300-5577            Impact factor:   1.901


  4 in total

1.  A systematic scoping review to identify the design and assess the performance of devices for antenatal continuous fetal monitoring.

Authors:  Kajal K Tamber; Dexter J L Hayes; Stephen J Carey; Jayawan H B Wijekoon; Alexander E P Heazell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A Hybrid EMD-Kurtosis Method for Estimating Fetal Heart Rate from Continuous Doppler Signals.

Authors:  Haitham M Al-Angari; Yoshitaka Kimura; Leontios J Hadjileontiadis; Ahsan H Khandoker
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Is Abdominal Fetal Electrocardiography an Alternative to Doppler Ultrasound for FHR Variability Evaluation?

Authors:  Janusz Jezewski; Janusz Wrobel; Adam Matonia; Krzysztof Horoba; Radek Martinek; Tomasz Kupka; Michal Jezewski
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Fetal electrocardiograms, direct and abdominal with reference heartbeat annotations.

Authors:  Adam Matonia; Janusz Jezewski; Tomasz Kupka; Michał Jezewski; Krzysztof Horoba; Janusz Wrobel; Robert Czabanski; Radana Kahankowa
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 6.444

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.