Peter Hraber1, Michael S Seaman, Robert T Bailer, John R Mascola, David C Montefiori, Bette T Korber. 1. aTheoretical Biology and Biophysics, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico bCenter for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts cVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland dDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Studies of neutralizing antibodies in HIV-1 infected individuals provide insights into the quality of the response that should be possible to elicit with vaccines and ways to design effective immunogens. Some individuals make high titres of exceptional broadly reactive neutralizing antibodies that are of particular interest; however, more modest responses may be a reasonable goal for vaccines. We performed a large cross-sectional study to determine the spectrum of neutralization potency and breadth that is seen during chronic HIV-1 infection. DESIGN: Neutralization potency and breadth were assessed with genetically and geographically diverse panels of 205 chronic HIV-1 sera and 219 Env-pseudotyped viruses representing all major genetic subtypes of HIV-1. METHODS: Neutralization was measured by using Tat-regulated luciferase reporter gene expression in TZM-bl cells. Serum-neutralizing activity was compared with a diverse set of human mAbs that are widely considered to be broadly neutralizing. RESULTS: We observed a uniform continuum of responses, with most sera displaying some level of cross-neutralization, and approximately 50% of sera neutralizing more than 50% of viruses. Titres of neutralization (potency) were highly correlated with breadth. Many sera had breadth comparable to several of the less potent broadly neutralizing human mAbs. CONCLUSION: These results help clarify the spectrum of serum-neutralizing activity induced by HIV-1 infection and that should be possible to elicit with vaccines. Importantly, most people appear capable of making low to moderate titres of broadly neutralizing antibodies. Additional studies of these relatively common responses might provide insights for practical and feasible vaccine designs.
OBJECTIVE: Studies of neutralizing antibodies in HIV-1 infected individuals provide insights into the quality of the response that should be possible to elicit with vaccines and ways to design effective immunogens. Some individuals make high titres of exceptional broadly reactive neutralizing antibodies that are of particular interest; however, more modest responses may be a reasonable goal for vaccines. We performed a large cross-sectional study to determine the spectrum of neutralization potency and breadth that is seen during chronic HIV-1 infection. DESIGN: Neutralization potency and breadth were assessed with genetically and geographically diverse panels of 205 chronic HIV-1 sera and 219 Env-pseudotyped viruses representing all major genetic subtypes of HIV-1. METHODS: Neutralization was measured by using Tat-regulated luciferase reporter gene expression in TZM-bl cells. Serum-neutralizing activity was compared with a diverse set of human mAbs that are widely considered to be broadly neutralizing. RESULTS: We observed a uniform continuum of responses, with most sera displaying some level of cross-neutralization, and approximately 50% of sera neutralizing more than 50% of viruses. Titres of neutralization (potency) were highly correlated with breadth. Many sera had breadth comparable to several of the less potent broadly neutralizing human mAbs. CONCLUSION: These results help clarify the spectrum of serum-neutralizing activity induced by HIV-1 infection and that should be possible to elicit with vaccines. Importantly, most people appear capable of making low to moderate titres of broadly neutralizing antibodies. Additional studies of these relatively common responses might provide insights for practical and feasible vaccine designs.
Authors: Michael S Seaman; Holly Janes; Natalie Hawkins; Lauren E Grandpre; Colleen Devoy; Ayush Giri; Rory T Coffey; Linda Harris; Blake Wood; Marcus G Daniels; Tanmoy Bhattacharya; Alan Lapedes; Victoria R Polonis; Francine E McCutchan; Peter B Gilbert; Steve G Self; Bette T Korber; David C Montefiori; John R Mascola Journal: J Virol Date: 2009-11-25 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Tongqing Zhou; Ivelin Georgiev; Xueling Wu; Zhi-Yong Yang; Kaifan Dai; Andrés Finzi; Young Do Kwon; Johannes F Scheid; Wei Shi; Ling Xu; Yongping Yang; Jiang Zhu; Michel C Nussenzweig; Joseph Sodroski; Lawrence Shapiro; Gary J Nabel; John R Mascola; Peter D Kwong Journal: Science Date: 2010-07-08 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Peter Gilbert; Maggie Wang; Terri Wrin; Chris Petropoulos; Marc Gurwith; Faruk Sinangil; Patricia D'Souza; Isaac R Rodriguez-Chavez; Allan DeCamp; Mike Giganti; Phillip W Berman; Steve G Self; David C Montefiori Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2010-08-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Johannes F Scheid; Hugo Mouquet; Niklas Feldhahn; Michael S Seaman; Klara Velinzon; John Pietzsch; Rene G Ott; Robert M Anthony; Henry Zebroski; Arlene Hurley; Adhuna Phogat; Bimal Chakrabarti; Yuxing Li; Mark Connors; Florencia Pereyra; Bruce D Walker; Hedda Wardemann; David Ho; Richard T Wyatt; John R Mascola; Jeffrey V Ravetch; Michel C Nussenzweig Journal: Nature Date: 2009-03-15 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Melissa D Simek; Wasima Rida; Frances H Priddy; Pham Pung; Emily Carrow; Dagna S Laufer; Jennifer K Lehrman; Mark Boaz; Tony Tarragona-Fiol; George Miiro; Josephine Birungi; Anton Pozniak; Dale A McPhee; Olivier Manigart; Etienne Karita; André Inwoley; Walter Jaoko; Jack Dehovitz; Linda-Gail Bekker; Punnee Pitisuttithum; Robert Paris; Laura M Walker; Pascal Poignard; Terri Wrin; Patricia E Fast; Dennis R Burton; Wayne C Koff Journal: J Virol Date: 2009-05-13 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Laura M Walker; Sanjay K Phogat; Po-Ying Chan-Hui; Denise Wagner; Pham Phung; Julie L Goss; Terri Wrin; Melissa D Simek; Steven Fling; Jennifer L Mitcham; Jennifer K Lehrman; Frances H Priddy; Ole A Olsen; Steven M Frey; Phillip W Hammond; Stephen Kaminsky; Timothy Zamb; Matthew Moyle; Wayne C Koff; Pascal Poignard; Dennis R Burton Journal: Science Date: 2009-09-03 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Davide Corti; Johannes P M Langedijk; Andreas Hinz; Michael S Seaman; Fabrizia Vanzetta; Blanca M Fernandez-Rodriguez; Chiara Silacci; Debora Pinna; David Jarrossay; Sunita Balla-Jhagjhoorsingh; Betty Willems; Maria J Zekveld; Hanna Dreja; Eithne O'Sullivan; Corinna Pade; Chloe Orkin; Simon A Jeffs; David C Montefiori; David Davis; Winfried Weissenhorn; Aine McKnight; Jonathan L Heeney; Federica Sallusto; Quentin J Sattentau; Robin A Weiss; Antonio Lanzavecchia Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Gama P Bandawe; Penny L Moore; Lise Werner; Elin S Gray; Daniel J Sheward; Maphuti Madiga; Andile Nofemela; Ruwayhida Thebus; Jinny C Marais; Leonard Maboko; Salim S Abdool Karim; Michael Hoelscher; Lynn Morris; Carolyn Williamson Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Nicole A Doria-Rose; Jinal N Bhiman; Ryan S Roark; Chaim A Schramm; Jason Gorman; Gwo-Yu Chuang; Marie Pancera; Evan M Cale; Michael J Ernandes; Mark K Louder; Mangaiarkarasi Asokan; Robert T Bailer; Aliaksandr Druz; Isabella R Fraschilla; Nigel J Garrett; Marissa Jarosinski; Rebecca M Lynch; Krisha McKee; Sijy O'Dell; Amarendra Pegu; Stephen D Schmidt; Ryan P Staupe; Matthew S Sutton; Keyun Wang; Constantinos Kurt Wibmer; Barton F Haynes; Salim Abdool-Karim; Lawrence Shapiro; Peter D Kwong; Penny L Moore; Lynn Morris; John R Mascola Journal: J Virol Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Allan deCamp; Peter Hraber; Robert T Bailer; Michael S Seaman; Christina Ochsenbauer; John Kappes; Raphael Gottardo; Paul Edlefsen; Steve Self; Haili Tang; Kelli Greene; Hongmei Gao; Xiaoju Daniell; Marcella Sarzotti-Kelsoe; Miroslaw K Gorny; Susan Zolla-Pazner; Celia C LaBranche; John R Mascola; Bette T Korber; David C Montefiori Journal: J Virol Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Feng Gao; Mattia Bonsignori; Hua-Xin Liao; Amit Kumar; Shi-Mao Xia; Xiaozhi Lu; Fangping Cai; Kwan-Ki Hwang; Hongshuo Song; Tongqing Zhou; Rebecca M Lynch; S Munir Alam; M Anthony Moody; Guido Ferrari; Mark Berrong; Garnett Kelsoe; George M Shaw; Beatrice H Hahn; David C Montefiori; Gift Kamanga; Myron S Cohen; Peter Hraber; Peter D Kwong; Bette T Korber; John R Mascola; Thomas B Kepler; Barton F Haynes Journal: Cell Date: 2014-07-24 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Peter Rusert; Roger D Kouyos; Claus Kadelka; Hanna Ebner; Merle Schanz; Michael Huber; Dominique L Braun; Nathanael Hozé; Alexandra Scherrer; Carsten Magnus; Jacqueline Weber; Therese Uhr; Valentina Cippa; Christian W Thorball; Herbert Kuster; Matthias Cavassini; Enos Bernasconi; Matthias Hoffmann; Alexandra Calmy; Manuel Battegay; Andri Rauch; Sabine Yerly; Vincent Aubert; Thomas Klimkait; Jürg Böni; Jacques Fellay; Roland R Regoes; Huldrych F Günthard; Alexandra Trkola Journal: Nat Med Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Till Schoofs; Florian Klein; Malte Braunschweig; Edward F Kreider; Anna Feldmann; Lilian Nogueira; Thiago Oliveira; Julio C C Lorenzi; Erica H Parrish; Gerald H Learn; Anthony P West; Pamela J Bjorkman; Sarah J Schlesinger; Michael S Seaman; Julie Czartoski; M Juliana McElrath; Nico Pfeifer; Beatrice H Hahn; Marina Caskey; Michel C Nussenzweig Journal: Science Date: 2016-05-05 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Joshua D Amos; Jonathon E Himes; Lawrence Armand; Thaddeus C Gurley; David R Martinez; Lisa Colvin; Krista Beck; R Glenn Overman; Hua-Xin Liao; M Anthony Moody; Sallie R Permar Journal: J Virol Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 5.103