Literature DB >> 24361383

Surveillance computed tomographic arteriogram does not change management before 3 years in patients who have a normal post-EVAR study.

Vincent E Kirkpatrick1, Samuel E Wilson2, Russell A Williams2, Ian L Gordon2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Standard surveillance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) consists of periodic computed tomographic arteriographies (CTAs) usually performed at postoperative months 1, 6, and 12, and then annually. This imaging regimen is expensive and exposes patients to the hazards of radiation and intravenous contrast. We hypothesized that a normal 1-month CTA after EVAR with no endoleak or other significant abnormality predicts a low rate of future complications, which would justify a reduction in frequency of subsequent CTAs.
METHODS: We identified 106 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR at a single hospital from 2003 to 2010 and reviewed all their CTAs. Fifteen patients for whom we could not review a postoperative CTA were excluded. Of the remaining 91 patients, 70 (76.9%) had no abnormality on their CTA at 1 month after EVAR. The medical records of these 70 patients were analyzed for subsequent complications and interventions related to EVAR.
RESULTS: The mean patient follow-up was 3.4 ± 2.1 years. Five of the 70 (7.1%) patients with a normal post-EVAR CTA developed late complications consisting of 1 type I endoleak, 3 type II endoleaks, and 1 case of endotension. Only the type I endoleak and one of the type II endoleaks met criteria for intervention, and in both cases, the endoleaks were discovered >3 years after EVAR. Log-rank test showed a statistically significant increased freedom from aneurysm sac expansion in patients with a normal compared with an abnormal 1-month CTA (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: For patients who have a normal CTA with no endoleak 1 month after EVAR, it is reasonable to consider less-frequent CTA surveillance because no significant complications requiring intervention occurred before 3 years. This would decrease unnecessary CTAs and health care expenditures as well as minimize patient exposure to radiation and intravenous contrast. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24361383     DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  3 in total

Review 1.  Predictive Factors for the Development of Type 2 Endoleak Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Paul J O'Connor; Robert A Lookstein
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elin Kjelle; Eivind Richter Andersen; Arne Magnus Krokeide; Lesley J J Soril; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Fiona M Clement; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.795

3.  Aortic sac enlargement after endovascular aneurysm repair: volume-related changes and the impact of intraluminal thrombus.

Authors:  Arminas Skrebunas; Givi Lengvenis; Inga Urte Builyte; Ruta Zulpaite; Rytis Bliudzius; Tomas Baltrunas; Nerijus Misonis; Germanas Marinskis
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.