Literature DB >> 24361132

Short trains of intra-epidermal electrical stimulation to elicit reliable behavioral and electrophysiological responses to the selective activation of nociceptors in humans.

André Mouraux1, Emilie Marot1, Valéry Legrain2.   

Abstract

Currently, the study of nociception in humans relies mainly on thermal stimulation of heat-sensitive nociceptive afferents. To circumvent some limitations of thermal stimulation, it was proposed that intra-epidermal electrical stimulation (IES) could be used as an alternative method to activate nociceptors selectively. The selectivity of IES relies on the fact that it can generate a very focal electrical current and, thereby, activate nociceptive free nerve endings located in the epidermis without concomitantly activating non-nociceptive mechanoreceptors located more deeply in the dermis. However, an important limitation of IES is that it is selective for nociceptors only when very low current intensities are used. At these intensities, the stimulus generates a very weak percept, and the signal-to-noise ratio of the elicited evoked potentials (EPs) is very low. To circumvent this limitation, it was proposed that the strength of the nociceptive afferent volley could be increased through temporal summation, using short trains of repeated IES. Here, we characterized the intensity of perception and EPs elicited by trains of 2, 3 and 4 IES delivered using a 5-ms inter-stimulus interval. We found that both the intensity of perception and the magnitude of EPs significantly increased with the number of pulses. In contrast, the latency of the elicited EPs was not affected by the number of pulses, indicating that temporal summation did not affect the type of activated fibers and, therefore, that trains of IES can be used to increase the reliability of stimulus-evoked responses while still preserving its selectivity for nociceptors.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evoked potentials; Input strength; Intra-epidermal stimulation; Nociception

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24361132     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.12.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  17 in total

1.  Orienting attention in visual space by nociceptive stimuli: investigation with a temporal order judgment task based on the adaptive PSI method.

Authors:  Lieve Filbrich; Andrea Alamia; Soline Burns; Valéry Legrain
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  From a Somatotopic to a Spatiotopic Frame of Reference for the Localization of Nociceptive Stimuli.

Authors:  Annick L De Paepe; Geert Crombez; Valéry Legrain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Effect of temporal stimulus properties on the nociceptive detection probability using intra-epidermal electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Robert J Doll; Annefloor C A Maten; Sjoerd P G Spaan; Peter H Veltink; Jan R Buitenweg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Transcranial Static Magnetic Field Stimulation over the Primary Motor Cortex Induces Plastic Changes in Cortical Nociceptive Processing.

Authors:  Hikari Kirimoto; Hiroyuki Tamaki; Naufumi Otsuru; Koya Yamashiro; Hideaki Onishi; Ippei Nojima; Antonio Oliviero
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Shaping visual space perception through bodily sensations: Testing the impact of nociceptive stimuli on visual perception in peripersonal space with temporal order judgments.

Authors:  Lieve Filbrich; Andrea Alamia; Séverine Blandiaux; Soline Burns; Valéry Legrain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Computational modeling of Adelta-fiber-mediated nociceptive detection of electrocutaneous stimulation.

Authors:  Huan Yang; Hil G E Meijer; Robert J Doll; Jan R Buitenweg; Stephan A van Gils
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Brain potentials evoked by intraepidermal electrical stimuli reflect the central sensitization of nociceptive pathways.

Authors:  M Liang; M C Lee; J O'Neill; A H Dickenson; G D Iannetti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Responsiveness of electrical nociceptive detection thresholds to capsaicin (8 %)-induced changes in nociceptive processing.

Authors:  Robert J Doll; Guido van Amerongen; Justin L Hay; Geert J Groeneveld; Peter H Veltink; Jan R Buitenweg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Augmented Pain Processing in Primary and Secondary Somatosensory Cortex in Fibromyalgia: A Magnetoencephalography Study Using Intra-Epidermal Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Manyoel Lim; Meyke Roosink; June Sic Kim; Hye Won Kim; Eun Bong Lee; Kyeong Min Son; Hyun Ah Kim; Chun Kee Chung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  What's Coming Near? The Influence of Dynamical Visual Stimuli on Nociceptive Processing.

Authors:  Annick L De Paepe; Geert Crombez; Valéry Legrain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.