Emily C Williams1, Anna D Rubinsky2, Gwen T Lapham3, Laura J Chavez4, Stacey E Rittmueller5, Eric J Hawkins6, Joel R Grossbard7, Daniel R Kivlahan6, Katharine A Bradley8. 1. Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Health Services Research & Development, Veteran Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States. Electronic address: emily.williams3@va.gov. 2. Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Health Services Research & Development, Veteran Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States; Center of Excellence for Substance Abuse Treatment and Education, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States. 3. Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Health Services Research & Development, Veteran Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States; Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States. 4. Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Health Services Research & Development, Veteran Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States. 5. Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Health Services Research & Development, Veteran Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States. 6. Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Health Services Research & Development, Veteran Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States; Center of Excellence for Substance Abuse Treatment and Education, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States. 7. Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Health Services Research & Development, Veteran Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States; Center of Excellence for Substance Abuse Treatment and Education, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States. 8. Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Health Services Research & Development, Veteran Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States; Center of Excellence for Substance Abuse Treatment and Education, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of routine alcohol screening is to identify patients who may benefit from brief intervention, but patients who also have alcohol and other substance use disorders (AUD/SUD) likely require more intensive interventions. This study sought to determine the prevalence of clinically documented AUD/SUD among VA outpatients with unhealthy alcohol use identified by routine screening. METHODS:VA patients 18-90 years who screened positive for unhealthy alcohol use (AUDIT-C ≥3 women; ≥4 men) and were randomly selected for quality improvement standardized medical record review (6/06-6/10) were included. Gender-stratified prevalences of clinically documented AUD/SUD (diagnosis of AUD, SUD, or alcohol-specific medical conditions, or VA specialty addictions treatment on the date of or 365 days prior to screening) were estimated and compared across AUDIT-C risk groups, and then repeated across groups further stratified by age. RESULTS: Among 63,397 eligible patients with unhealthy alcohol use, 25% (n=2109) women and 28% (n=15,199) men had documented AUD/SUD (p<0.001). The prevalence of AUD/SUD increased with increasing AUDIT-C risk, ranging from 13% (95% CI 13-14%) to 82% (79-85%) for women and 12% (11-12%) to 69% (68-71%) for men in the lowest and highest AUDIT-C risk groups, respectively. Patterns were similar across age groups. CONCLUSIONS: One-quarter of all patients with unhealthy alcohol use, and a majority of those with the highest alcohol screening scores, had clinically recognized AUD/SUD. Healthcare systems implementing evidence-based alcohol-related care should be prepared to offer more intensive interventions and/or effective pharmacotherapies for these patients. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of routine alcohol screening is to identify patients who may benefit from brief intervention, but patients who also have alcohol and other substance use disorders (AUD/SUD) likely require more intensive interventions. This study sought to determine the prevalence of clinically documented AUD/SUD among VA outpatients with unhealthy alcohol use identified by routine screening. METHODS: VA patients 18-90 years who screened positive for unhealthy alcohol use (AUDIT-C ≥3 women; ≥4 men) and were randomly selected for quality improvement standardized medical record review (6/06-6/10) were included. Gender-stratified prevalences of clinically documented AUD/SUD (diagnosis of AUD, SUD, or alcohol-specific medical conditions, or VA specialty addictions treatment on the date of or 365 days prior to screening) were estimated and compared across AUDIT-C risk groups, and then repeated across groups further stratified by age. RESULTS: Among 63,397 eligible patients with unhealthy alcohol use, 25% (n=2109) women and 28% (n=15,199) men had documented AUD/SUD (p<0.001). The prevalence of AUD/SUD increased with increasing AUDIT-C risk, ranging from 13% (95% CI 13-14%) to 82% (79-85%) for women and 12% (11-12%) to 69% (68-71%) for men in the lowest and highest AUDIT-C risk groups, respectively. Patterns were similar across age groups. CONCLUSIONS: One-quarter of all patients with unhealthy alcohol use, and a majority of those with the highest alcohol screening scores, had clinically recognized AUD/SUD. Healthcare systems implementing evidence-based alcohol-related care should be prepared to offer more intensive interventions and/or effective pharmacotherapies for these patients. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Entities:
Keywords:
Alcohol screening; Alcohol use disorders; Substance use disorders
Authors: Andrew M Moon; Pamela K Green; Don C Rockey; Kristin Berry; George N Ioannou Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: George N Ioannou; Lauren A Beste; Pamela K Green; Amit G Singal; Elliot B Tapper; Akbar K Waljee; Richard K Sterling; Jordan J Feld; David E Kaplan; Tamar H Taddei; Kristin Berry Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2019-07-26 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Kevin A Hallgren; Theresa E Matson; Malia Oliver; Katie Witkiewitz; Jennifer F Bobb; Amy K Lee; Ryan M Caldeiro; Daniel Kivlahan; Katharine A Bradley Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-08-16 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Lauren Lipira; Deepa Rao; Paul E Nevin; Christopher G Kemp; Susan E Cohn; Janet M Turan; Jane M Simoni; Michele P Andrasik; Audrey L French; Joseph M Unger; Patrick Heagerty; Emily C Williams Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-11-20 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Kevin A Hallgren; Theresa E Matson; Malia Oliver; Ryan M Caldeiro; Daniel R Kivlahan; Katharine A Bradley Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2022-03 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Binu V John; Kaley Schwartz; Cynthia Levy; Bassam Dahman; Yangyang Deng; Paul Martin; Tamar H Taddei; David E Kaplan Journal: Hepatol Commun Date: 2021-05-06
Authors: Binu V John; Kaley Schwartz; Andrew R Scheinberg; Bassam Dahman; Seth Spector; Yangyang Deng; David Goldberg; Paul Martin; Tamar H Taddei; David E Kaplan Journal: Transplantation Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 5.385