PURPOSE: To review the literature on goal directed fluid therapy and evaluate the quality of evidence for each combination of goal and monitoring method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of major digital databases and hand search of references was conducted. All studies assessing the clinical utility of a specific fluid therapy goal or set of goals using any monitoring method were included. Data was extracted using a pre-determined pro forma and papers were evaluated using GRADE principles to assess evidence quality. RESULTS: Eighty-one papers met the inclusion criteria, investigating 31 goals and 22 methods for monitoring fluid therapy in 13052 patients. In total there were 118 different goal/method combinations. Goals with high evidence quality were central venous lactate and stroke volume index. Goals with moderate quality evidence were sublingual microcirculation flow, the oxygen extraction ratio, cardiac index, cardiac output, and SVC collapsibility index. CONCLUSIONS: This review has highlighted the plethora of goals and methods for monitoring fluid therapy. Strikingly, there is scant high quality evidence, in particular for non-invasive G/M combinations in non-operative and non-intensive care settings. There is an urgent need to address this research gap, which will be helped by methodologies to compare utility of G/M combinations.
PURPOSE: To review the literature on goal directed fluid therapy and evaluate the quality of evidence for each combination of goal and monitoring method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of major digital databases and hand search of references was conducted. All studies assessing the clinical utility of a specific fluid therapy goal or set of goals using any monitoring method were included. Data was extracted using a pre-determined pro forma and papers were evaluated using GRADE principles to assess evidence quality. RESULTS: Eighty-one papers met the inclusion criteria, investigating 31 goals and 22 methods for monitoring fluid therapy in 13052 patients. In total there were 118 different goal/method combinations. Goals with high evidence quality were central venous lactate and stroke volume index. Goals with moderate quality evidence were sublingual microcirculation flow, the oxygen extraction ratio, cardiac index, cardiac output, and SVC collapsibility index. CONCLUSIONS: This review has highlighted the plethora of goals and methods for monitoring fluid therapy. Strikingly, there is scant high quality evidence, in particular for non-invasive G/M combinations in non-operative and non-intensive care settings. There is an urgent need to address this research gap, which will be helped by methodologies to compare utility of G/M combinations.
Authors: Brian P Chen; Marian Chen; Sean Bennett; Kristina Lemon; Kimberly A Bertens; Fady K Balaa; Guillaume Martel Journal: World J Surg Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Michael R Mathis; Samuel A Schechtman; Milo C Engoren; Amy M Shanks; Aleda Thompson; Sachin Kheterpal; Kevin K Tremper Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Zachary Pressman; Joseph Henningsen; Scott Huff; Autumnn Merrill; Andrew Froehle; Michael Prayson Journal: J Clin Orthop Trauma Date: 2022-02-09
Authors: Lais Helena Camacho Navarro; Joshua A Bloomstone; Jose Otavio Costa Auler; Maxime Cannesson; Giorgio Della Rocca; Tong J Gan; Michael Kinsky; Sheldon Magder; Timothy E Miller; Monty Mythen; Azriel Perel; Daniel A Reuter; Michael R Pinsky; George C Kramer Journal: Perioper Med (Lond) Date: 2015-04-10
Authors: Carl Otto Schell; Markus Castegren; Edwin Lugazia; Jonas Blixt; Moses Mulungu; David Konrad; Tim Baker Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2015-07-25
Authors: J V T Tilsed; A Casamassima; H Kurihara; D Mariani; I Martinez; J Pereira; L Ponchietti; A Shamiyeh; F Al-Ayoubi; L A B Barco; M Ceolin; A J G D'Almeida; S Hilario; A L Olavarria; M M Ozmen; L F Pinheiro; M Poeze; G Triantos; F T Fuentes; S U Sierra; K Soreide; H Yanar Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 3.693