Jeannette Brodbeck1, Niklaus Stulz2, Simon Itten2, Daniel Regli2, Hansjoerg Znoj2, Franz Caspar2. 1. Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Berne, Switzerland. Electronic address: jeannette.brodbeck@psy.unibe.ch. 2. Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Berne, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Research on comorbidity of psychiatric disorders identifies broad superordinate dimensions as underlying structure of psychopathology. While a syndrome-level approach informs diagnostic systems, a symptom-level approach is more likely to represent the dimensional components within existing diagnostic categories. It may capture general emotional, cognitive or physiological processes as underlying liabilities of different disorders and thus further develop dimensional-spectrum models of psychopathology. METHODS: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine the structure of psychopathological symptoms assessed with the Brief Symptom Inventory in two outpatient samples (n=3171), including several correlated-factors and bifactor models. The preferred models were correlated with DSM-diagnoses. RESULTS: A model containing eight correlated factors for depressed mood, phobic fear, aggression, suicidal ideation, nervous tension, somatic symptoms, information processing deficits, and interpersonal insecurity, as well a bifactor model fit the data best. Distinct patterns of correlations with DSM-diagnoses identified a) distress-related disorders, i.e., mood disorders, PTSD, and personality disorders, which were associated with all correlated factors as well as the underlying general distress factor; b) anxiety disorders with more specific patterns of correlations; and c) disorders defined by behavioural or somatic dysfunctions, which were characterised by non-significant or negative correlations with most factors. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified emotional, somatic, cognitive, and interpersonal components of psychopathology as transdiagnostic psychopathological liabilities. These components can contribute to a more accurate description and taxonomy of psychopathology, may serve as phenotypic constructs for further aetiological research, and can inform the development of tailored general and specific interventions to treat mental disorders.
BACKGROUND: Research on comorbidity of psychiatric disorders identifies broad superordinate dimensions as underlying structure of psychopathology. While a syndrome-level approach informs diagnostic systems, a symptom-level approach is more likely to represent the dimensional components within existing diagnostic categories. It may capture general emotional, cognitive or physiological processes as underlying liabilities of different disorders and thus further develop dimensional-spectrum models of psychopathology. METHODS: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine the structure of psychopathological symptoms assessed with the Brief Symptom Inventory in two outpatient samples (n=3171), including several correlated-factors and bifactor models. The preferred models were correlated with DSM-diagnoses. RESULTS: A model containing eight correlated factors for depressed mood, phobic fear, aggression, suicidal ideation, nervous tension, somatic symptoms, information processing deficits, and interpersonal insecurity, as well a bifactor model fit the data best. Distinct patterns of correlations with DSM-diagnoses identified a) distress-related disorders, i.e., mood disorders, PTSD, and personality disorders, which were associated with all correlated factors as well as the underlying general distress factor; b) anxiety disorders with more specific patterns of correlations; and c) disorders defined by behavioural or somatic dysfunctions, which were characterised by non-significant or negative correlations with most factors. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified emotional, somatic, cognitive, and interpersonal components of psychopathology as transdiagnostic psychopathological liabilities. These components can contribute to a more accurate description and taxonomy of psychopathology, may serve as phenotypic constructs for further aetiological research, and can inform the development of tailored general and specific interventions to treat mental disorders.
Authors: Janelle M Painter; Kristen Gray; Meghan M McGinn; Sheeva Mostoufi; Katherine D Hoerster Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2016-04-16 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Brian Mattera; Ethan C Levine; Omar Martinez; Miguel Muñoz-Laboy; Carolina Hausmann-Stabile; José Bauermeister; M Isa Fernandez; Don Operario; Carlos Rodriguez-Diaz Journal: Cult Health Sex Date: 2017-09-20
Authors: Peter de Jonge; Klaas J Wardenaar; Carmen C W Lim; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Jordi Alonso; Laura Helena Andrade; Brendan Bunting; Somnath Chatterji; Marius Ciutan; Oye Gureje; Elie G Karam; Sing Lee; Maria Elena Medina-Mora; Jacek Moskalewicz; Fernando Navarro-Mateu; Beth-Ellen Pennell; Marina Piazza; José Posada-Villa; Yolanda Torres; Ronald C Kessler; Kate Scott Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Aureliano Crameri; Christopher Schuetz; Andreas Andreae; Margit Koemeda; Peter Schulthess; Volker Tschuschke; Agnes von Wyl Journal: Psychiatry J Date: 2016-09-08