Literature DB >> 24360576

Embedded multicellular spheroids as a biomimetic 3D cancer model for evaluating drug and drug-device combinations.

Kristie M Charoen1, Brian Fallica1, Yolonda L Colson2, Muhammad H Zaman3, Mark W Grinstaff4.   

Abstract

Multicellular aggregates of cells, termed spheroids, are of interest for studying tumor behavior and for evaluating the response of pharmacologically active agents. Spheroids more faithfully reproduce the tumor macrostructure found in vivo compared to classical 2D monolayers. We present a method for embedding spheroids within collagen gels followed by quantitative and qualitative whole spheroid and single cell analyses enabling characterization over the length scales from molecular to macroscopic. Spheroid producing and embedding capabilities are demonstrated for U2OS and MDA-MB-231 cell lines, of osteosarcoma and breast adenocarcinoma origin, respectively. Finally, using the MDA-MB-231 tumor model, the chemotherapeutic response between paclitaxel delivery as a bolus dose, as practiced in the clinic, is compared to delivery within an expansile nanoparticle. The expansile nanoparticle delivery route provides a superior outcome and the results mirror those observed in a murine xenograft model. These findings highlight the synergistic beneficial results that may arise from the use of a drug delivery system, and the need to evaluate both drug candidates and delivery systems in the research and preclinical screening phases of a new cancer therapy development program.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D cell culture; Cancer model; Cell migration; Collagen; Drug delivery; Spheroid; Tumor mimic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24360576      PMCID: PMC3923358          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  53 in total

Review 1.  Gene expression perturbation in vitro--a growing case for three-dimensional (3D) culture systems.

Authors:  Anna Birgersdotter; Rickard Sandberg; Ingemar Ernberg
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 15.707

2.  Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis.

Authors:  Muhammad H Zaman; Linda M Trapani; Alisha L Sieminski; Alisha Siemeski; Drew Mackellar; Haiyan Gong; Roger D Kamm; Alan Wells; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Paul Matsudaira
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue.

Authors:  Francesco Pampaloni; Emmanuel G Reynaud; Ernst H K Stelzer
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 94.444

4.  A mathematical model of glioblastoma tumor spheroid invasion in a three-dimensional in vitro experiment.

Authors:  Andrew M Stein; Tim Demuth; David Mobley; Michael Berens; Leonard M Sander
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Enhanced cytotoxic effects of 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy by concurrent hyperthermia in glioma spheroids.

Authors:  Henry Hirschberg; Chung-Ho Sun; Bruce J Tromberg; Alvin T Yeh; Steen J Madsen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype.

Authors:  Matthew J Paszek; Nastaran Zahir; Kandice R Johnson; Johnathon N Lakins; Gabriela I Rozenberg; Amit Gefen; Cynthia A Reinhart-King; Susan S Margulies; Micah Dembo; David Boettiger; Daniel A Hammer; Valerie M Weaver
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 31.743

7.  Heterogeneous breast tumoroids: An in vitro assay for investigating cellular heterogeneity and drug delivery.

Authors:  Alexandra P Vamvakidou; Mark J Mondrinos; Sokol P Petushi; Fernando U Garcia; Peter I Lelkes; Aydin Tozeren
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2006-12-08

8.  Engineering tumors with 3D scaffolds.

Authors:  Claudia Fischbach; Ruth Chen; Takuya Matsumoto; Tobias Schmelzle; Joan S Brugge; Peter J Polverini; David J Mooney
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-09-02       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 9.  Experimental anti-tumor therapy in 3-D: spheroids--old hat or new challenge?

Authors:  Juergen Friedrich; Reinhard Ebner; Leoni A Kunz-Schughart
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.694

10.  Prognostic breast cancer signature identified from 3D culture model accurately predicts clinical outcome across independent datasets.

Authors:  Katherine J Martin; Denis R Patrick; Mina J Bissell; Marcia V Fournier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  47 in total

1.  Mimicking the tumor microenvironment to regulate macrophage phenotype and assessing chemotherapeutic efficacy in embedded cancer cell/macrophage spheroid models.

Authors:  Kristie M Tevis; Ryan J Cecchi; Yolonda L Colson; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  3D Tumor Spheroid Models for In Vitro Therapeutic Screening of Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Simonas Daunys; Agnė Janonienė; Indrė Januškevičienė; Miglė Paškevičiūtė; Vilma Petrikaitė
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 3.  Three-dimensional in vitro tumor models for cancer research and drug evaluation.

Authors:  Xian Xu; Mary C Farach-Carson; Xinqiao Jia
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 14.227

4.  Modeling the Tumor Microenvironment and Pathogenic Signaling in Bone Sarcoma.

Authors:  Eric R Molina; Letitia K Chim; Sergio Barrios; Joseph A Ludwig; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 6.389

5.  Mechanical confinement via a PEG/Collagen interpenetrating network inhibits behavior characteristic of malignant cells in the triple negative breast cancer cell line MDA.MB.231.

Authors:  Daniel S Reynolds; Kristen M Bougher; Justin H Letendre; Stephen F Fitzgerald; Undina O Gisladottir; Mark W Grinstaff; Muhammad H Zaman
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 6.  Nanoparticle drug-delivery systems for peritoneal cancers: a case study of the design, characterization and development of the expansile nanoparticle.

Authors:  Aaron H Colby; Nicholas H Oberlies; Cedric J Pearce; Victoria L M Herrera; Yolonda L Colson; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2017-02-09

Review 7.  Hydrogels to model 3D in vitro microenvironment of tumor vascularization.

Authors:  Hyun-Ho Greco Song; Kyung Min Park; Sharon Gerecht
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 15.470

8.  A 3D printed nano bone matrix for characterization of breast cancer cell and osteoblast interactions.

Authors:  Wei Zhu; Nathan J Castro; Haitao Cui; Xuan Zhou; Benchaa Boualam; Robert McGrane; Robert I Glazer; Lijie Grace Zhang
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.874

9.  CD44v6 increases gastric cancer malignant phenotype by modulating adipose stromal cell-mediated ECM remodeling.

Authors:  Bianca N Lourenço; Nora L Springer; Daniel Ferreira; Carla Oliveira; Pedro L Granja; Claudia Fischbach
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 10.  Generation of Multicellular Breast Cancer Tumor Spheroids: Comparison of Different Protocols.

Authors:  Karolin Froehlich; Jan-Dirk Haeger; Julia Heger; Jana Pastuschek; Stella Mary Photini; Yan Yan; Amelie Lupp; Christiane Pfarrer; Ralf Mrowka; Ekkehard Schleußner; Udo R Markert; André Schmidt
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.