Literature DB >> 24360347

Long-term degradation of poly-lactic co-glycolide/β-tricalcium phosphate biocomposite anchors in arthroscopic bankart repair: a prospective study.

Pietro Randelli1, Riccardo Compagnoni2, Alberto Aliprandi3, Paola Maria Cannaò3, Vincenza Ragone1, Alberto Tassi4, Paolo Cabitza1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate, using magnetic resonance (MR), the biological efficacy of anchors made of 30% β-tricalcium phosphate and 70% poly-lactic co-glycolide (PLGA) used for the repair of Bankart lesions after shoulder instability.
METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients who were candidates for surgical treatment for unidirectional, post-traumatic shoulder instability were treated arthroscopically with anchors made of 70% PLGA plus 30% β-tricalcium phosphate preloaded with OrthoCord suture (DePuy Mitek, Raynham, MA). Fifteen of them were evaluated by MR at least 16 months after the intervention. A second evaluation was performed at least 12 months after the first evaluation in the patients in whom implanted anchors were still visible at the first evaluation (n = 5) with a low-intensity signal in all sequences. Two radiologists, with different amounts of experience (15 and 3 years), separately evaluated the MR patterns of the trabecular glenoid bone, the walls of the bone tunnel, and the signal from the anchors. The following parameters were considered in the MR evaluation: integrity of the tunnel edge (grade 0 to 2), intensity of the signal from the anchor site (grade 1 to 3), and presence of cystic lesions. The normal signal from the glenoid trabecular bone has been used as the reference parameter. The anchors were considered independent variables, and thus each one was analyzed individually, even in the same patient. At the final clinical follow-up, a Rowe questionnaire was filled out for each patient.
RESULTS: Overall, 44 anchors were evaluated (33 anchors at the first follow-up and 11 anchors at the second follow-up). The mean follow-up period was 28.6 months. With the exception of 2 patients (10%), none of the patients had any episodes of dislocation, having satisfactory postoperative results. No cystic lesions were detected by MR imaging. The interobserver concordance between the 2 radiologists calculated with the Cohen κ was substantial (κ = 0.780 and κ = 0.791 for integrity of tunnel edge and for intensity of signal from anchor site, respectively). Both the integrity of the tunnel border and the intensity of the signal at the site of the anchors that had been implanted more than 24 months before the evaluation were significantly different from those of anchors implanted less than 24 months before the evaluation (tunnel border grade of 0 in 41%, 1 in 50%, and 2 in 9% v 0 in 4.5%, 1 in 50%, and 2 in 45.5% [P = .003]; anchor signal grade of 1 in 41%, 2 in 45.5%, and 3 in 13.5% v 1 in 13.5%, 2 in 41%, and 3 in 45.5% [P = .03]). Analysis of the linear contrasts (analysis of variance) showed a linear increase in the mean values for time to increased tunnel border grade (grade 0, 22 ± 4 months; grade 1, 27 ± 8 months; and grade 2, 29 ± 5 months [P = .02]) and grade of intensity of the signal in the anchor site (grade 1, 24 ± 6 months; grade 2, 26 ± 7 months; and grade 3, 29 ± 7 months [P = .05]).
CONCLUSIONS: Anchors made of 30% β-tricalcium phosphate and 70% PLGA showed excellent biological efficacy, without causing significant cystic lesions, producing gradual changes in the MR signal that seems to become equivalent to that of the glenoid trabecular bone at a mean of 29 months after implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Copyright © 2014 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24360347     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.09.082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  8 in total

1.  Biocomposite Suture Anchors Remain Visible Two Years After Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Mirco Sgroi; Theresa Friesz; Michael Schocke; Heiko Reichel; Thomas Kappe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Biomaterials Used for Suture Anchors in Orthopedic Surgery.

Authors:  Chul-Hyun Cho; Ki-Cheor Bae; Du-Han Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-08-17

3.  Fixation methods and implants in shoulder stabilization: A historical perspective.

Authors:  Jonathan D Kramer; Sean Robinson; Eric Hohn; Connor Purviance; Eugene M Wolf
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-07

4.  Enhanced release of calcium phosphate additives from bioresorbable orthopaedic devices using irradiation technology is non-beneficial in a rabbit model: An animal study.

Authors:  I Palmer; S A Clarke; F J Buchanan
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 5.853

5.  Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using Poly Lactic-co-glycolic Acid Plus β-tricalcium Phosphate Biocomposite Suture Anchors.

Authors:  Seok Won Chung; Kyung-Soo Oh; Sung Jin Kang; Jong Pil Yoon; Joon Yub Kim
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2018-03-01

6.  Anterior Glenoid Rim Fracture Following Use of Resorbable Devices for Glenohumeral Stabilization.

Authors:  Carlo Alberto Augusti; Paolo Paladini; Fabrizio Campi; Giovanni Merolla; Marco Bigoni; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-06-08

7.  Analysis of postoperative monitoring of patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy for anterior instability.

Authors:  Alexandre Almeida; Samuel Millán Menegotto; Nayvaldo Couto de Almeida; Ana Paula Agostini; Letícia Agostini de Almeida
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-06-22

8.  Long-term study on the osteogenetic capability and mechanical behavior of a new resorbable biocomposite anchor in a canine model.

Authors:  Xiao-Yan Cao; Cheng Chen; Na Tian; Xiang Dong; Xing Liang; Li-Jun Xu; Cheng-Kung Cheng
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 5.191

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.