Literature DB >> 24360344

The case of the QRS-T angles versus QRST integral maps.

Adriaan van Oosterom1.   

Abstract

This contribution discusses the QRS-T angle as well as the QRST integral map. Both of these topics have been tested in their application in extracting the major features of depolarization and repolarization: their spatio-temporal behaviour, and how much of their global or local nature might be deduced from signals that can be observed clinically. Recently, it is in particular the QRS-T angle that has received considerable attention, a method that stems directly from vectorcardiography, a subdomain of electrocardiography. The QRST integral map is a display of a map on the body surface of the integrals over time of the ECG signals observed at sets of electrodes. The common biophysical background of both techniques is highlighted. In particular it is explained why, in healthy myocardium, both provide a similar view on the global timing of the depolarization and repolarization of all cardiac myocytes, more specifically, on the dispersion of their action potential durations. In the presence of ischemia, the view obtained is of the integral over time of the transmembrane potentials, which comprises a 'mixture' of their timing and magnitude. The analysis of results of a simulation study emphasizes the large discrepancies that may be observed between the QRS-T angle in the frontal plane and its 3D variant. It is shown that the required vector representation of the signals may be derived from the 12-lead ECG by using the transfer matrix proposed in 1990 by Kors and colleagues.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D vectors; Frontal plane vectors; QRS-T angle; The QRST-integral map

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24360344     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2013.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  1 in total

1.  Clinical value of different QRS-T angle expressions.

Authors:  Katerina Hnatkova; Joachim Seegers; Petra Barthel; Tomas Novotny; Peter Smetana; Markus Zabel; Georg Schmidt; Marek Malik
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.214

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.